Talk:Waluigi/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted |
BlueMoonset (talk | contribs) review was not adequate, so the passage is being reverted and the nomination is being placed back into the pool of unreviewed nominations with no loss of seniority |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==GA Review== |
==GA Review== |
||
{{ |
{{atop |
||
| status = |
| status = |
||
| result = Passed. [[User:Begocc|Begocci]] ([[User talk:Begocc|talk]]) 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
| result = <s>Passed.</s> [[User:Begocc|Begocci]] ([[User talk:Begocc|talk]]) 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)<br/>Review has been rolled back per discussion at [[WT:GAN]]; nomination is not passed, and a new review will be conducted on a different page. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Good article tools}} |
{{Good article tools}} |
||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 9 February 2024
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Begocc (talk · contribs) 15:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh this will be fun.
Last updated: 16:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC) by BlueMoonset
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
2c) it contains no original research
- 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:
- 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall:
Comments:
[edit]The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.