Talk:Battle of Babylon Hill: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:21, 9 February 2024

Battle of Babylon Hill is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 7, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 8, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
October 30, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 30, 2020	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 6, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to one historian, the Battle of Babylon Hill* was "more muddle than battle"?*
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 7, 2022, and September 7, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

B class review comment

I have two comments. Djmaschek (talk) 01:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you write a battle article, please edit the associated campaignbox template and add the battle name (in this case: Template:Campaignbox First English Civil War). This time I did it for you.
In the introduction, it says Hopton was almost captured, but I don't see this in the narrative. This information and citation should probably be in the narrative. I'm not sure in what part of the skirmish this happened. Once it's in the narrative, it does not need a citation in the introduction.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Article history
-{{featured article candidates|Battle of Babylon Hill/archive1}}
-{{ArticleHistory
 |action1 = GAN
 |action1date = 13:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
@@ Line 6: / Line 5: @@
 |action1result = listed
 |action1oldid = 920239007
 |action2 = WAR
 |action2date = 01:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |action2result = approved
 |action2oldid = 923424320
+|action3 = FAC
+|action3date = 2020-01-30
+|action3link = Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Babylon Hill/archive1
+|action3result = promoted
+|action3oldid = 937817621
+|currentstatus = FA
+|maindate=September 7, 2021
 |topic = War
-|currentstatus = GA
 |dykdate=6 October 2019
 |dykentry=... that according to one historian, the '''[[Battle of Babylon Hill]]''' was "more muddle than battle"?
 |dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Babylon Hill
+|four=yes
+|otd1date=2022-09-07|otd1oldid=1109039133
+|otd2date=2023-09-07|otd2oldid=1174343327
 }}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
-{{WPMILHIST|A-Class=pass |class=A|Biography=no|Three-Kingdoms=yes|British=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Military history|A-Class=pass |class=FA|Biography=no|Three-Kingdoms=yes|British=yes}}
-{{WikiProject UK |class=GA |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject United Kingdom|importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Dorset |class=GA |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Dorset |importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Somerset |class=GA |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Somerset |importance=low}}
 }}