Talk:Swordfish (film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 21:57, 9 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Swordfish (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Archives

Archive 1

Wrong movie date?

IMDB says the movie was released in 2001, so not sure why Wikipedia says 1983. 147.140.127.133 (talk) 00:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{talkheader}}
-{{Film|American-task-force=yes|class=Start}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}}
+}}
 {{archive basics}}
 {{archives}}
+== Wrong movie date? ==
-==opening==
-Would it be relevant to discuss how the opening dialog by Travolta's character being about how terrible Hollywood is with respect to realism and the many, many problems in this film?  The movie uses movie physics for its guns, and movie computer technology (techno-babble and random, made up computer technology). [[User:DoomBringer|DoomBringer]] 06:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
-I feel that this is a commentary on the movie by the director. With the unique visual style of the opening sequence that is not present anywhere else in the flick, it seems almost ironic. [[Special:Contributions/143.195.170.90|143.195.170.90]] ([[User talk:143.195.170.90|talk]]) 03:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
+IMDB says the movie was released in 2001, so not sure why Wikipedia says 1983. [[Special:Contributions/147.140.127.133|147.140.127.133]] ([[User talk:147.140.127.133|talk]]) 00:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
-According to Linus Torvalds books there are only about 30 Torvalds in the world, so the name Axl Torvalds has to be at least half a play on Linus' name. --[[User:Busterdog|Busterdog]] 01:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
-:I think it's funny that Axl Torvalds speaks German, although he's supposed to be Finnish (although he allegedly has connections to Germany close enough to own a German passport) [http://www.moviemistakes.com/film1254/page1] [[User:Wakuran|惑乱 分からん]] 21:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-::''A Finn named Axl Torvalds (Rudolf Martin) appears early in the film. His name was at first thought to be a pun on the Linux godfather Linus Torvalds'' - I really don't think that it qualifies as a 'pun'...tribute at best, maybe. [[User:Adonai-aus-|Adonai-aus-]] 06:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
-:::''It has now been revealed that the name is actually a reference to Guns and Roses frontman Axl Rose.''  Who revealed this?  This sounds like BS.  What would this guy have to do with Axl Rose? [[User:Teclis1|Teclis1]] 23:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
-== Cyberpunk? ==
-Well, Cyber, maybe. But the film feels about as "punk" as ''2 Fast 2 Furious''. Just a word of warning if you haven't seen it and expect a decent hacker film. &mdash; [[User:Ashmodai|Ashmodai]] <sup>([[User_talk:Ashmodai|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Ashmodai|contribs]])</sup> 13:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
-:Agreed. That should be removed. I'd do it myself, but I CBF. --Anonymous 16:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
-::Definitely not cyberpunk. Checking against criteria defined ni the cyberpunk article, it fails even on the loosest definitions - it's not set in the future and none of the story takes place in the online world. Unless there is anyone willing to defend the cyberpunk position, lose it.
-:::OK I'm taking it out
-It seems to have a lot in common with the cyberpunk novel Neuromancer. The film probably doesn't qualify as cyberpunk though.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.170.3.86|124.170.3.86]] ([[User talk:124.170.3.86|talk]]) 14:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Jackman Wheeze ==
-I think some information about the Jackman Wheeze is required <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Mhrmaw|Mhrmaw]] ([[User talk:Mhrmaw|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mhrmaw|contribs]]) 11:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
-I can't find a single reference to the "trademark" Jackman Wheeze anywhere else.  I'm removing that blurb unless you can back up your claim that it's his "trademark".  It may be funny to some people, but that doesn't mean that it's worth including.   [[User:Secretagentwang|Secretagentwang]] 14:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
-== Thomas Jefferosn once shot a man on the white house lawn for treason? ==
-did he really? if not what is the signifigance of this line? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/74.129.223.109|74.129.223.109]] ([[User talk:74.129.223.109|talk]]) 00:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
-==Fair use rationale for Image:Swordfish movie.jpg==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
-'''[[:Image:Swordfish movie.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].
-Please go to [[:Image:Swordfish movie.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
-If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->
-[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 08:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
-== Trivia ==
-Kudos to whoever removed the unsourced and uninteresting trivia section.  I do feel however it's worthwhile to include a link to [[Swordfish (password)]] somewhere on the article.  I'm putting it in a "See also" section for now.  Feel free to work it into the main article. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 17:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-:It shocks me at all the people that consider triva "worthless". Trivia adds a lot to an article; it gives us a section where we can put interesting facts. THe problem ONLY arrises when trivia becomes 5 pages of people saying stuff like "1 hour and 36 minutes into the film, the price of a coffee in the coffee shop is $2.37. If you take the name swordfish, and give each letter a number value (A=1 B=2 etc.), and those up, multiply by 15, take the sqare root, divide by 300, and multiply that by the cubed root of 1700 you get EXACTLY 2.37!!!!!". As long as its actuall trivia though, and only a few interesting things, a trivia section adds a lot.[[User:DurotarLord|DurotarLord]] ([[User talk:DurotarLord|talk]]) 14:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
-::I tend to agree with the stance taken at [[WP:HTRIV]]. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 14:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
-How to add sources to that Trivia section? I mean, for example the first fact written there about the hacker speaking German: How to give any source for that? It's just a fact that is obvious to people who know that language when watching the movie.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.187.227.228|87.187.227.228]] ([[User talk:87.187.227.228|talk]]) 18:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Terrorism ==
-The main goal of the character Gabriel is to steal money to fight terrorism.  This movie was released prior to September 11, 2001.  The film release on DVD was delayed due to the September 11 terrorist attacks.  Few people mention the connection between the movie's focus on terrorism and the terrorist attacks on September 11th. The goal of the character was quite timely considering that the terrorist attacks of September 11th happened soon after the movie's release.  Very few citizens of the United States of America considered terrorism to be a substantial threat at that time.  The character Gabriel spoke about his goal of protecting the citizens of the U.S.A. and how these same citizens were unaware of the danger that terrorism posed to their lives.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Duxchik|Duxchik]] ([[User talk:Duxchik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Duxchik|contribs]]) 17:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-I don't really get how we should conect this in the article, or even say the movie predicted correctly a turn on terrorism danger. Actually, Travolta's character has plans to vanish terrorism against USA by killing people, and so scare others with the possibility of dying too. September 11th terrorists used suicide actions so I don't believe this kind of "scare tatics" would work so much on them. [[Special:Contributions/187.80.116.70|187.80.116.70]] ([[User talk:187.80.116.70|talk]]) 09:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
-== 'Linux operating system' ==
-I know it is Wikipedia policy to refer to the GNU/Linux operating system as 'Linux'. This caused its usual confusion and somebody wrote on this article that Linus Torvalds 'created' the 'Linux operating system'. I changed this to show that he wrote the kernel and I made no mention of the OS. [[User:MeatyDoughnut|MeatyDoughnut]] ([[User talk:MeatyDoughnut|talk]]) 14:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)