Jump to content

Talk:Nazim Al-Haqqani: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Bapehu (talk | contribs)
344 edits
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=start|listas=Haqqani, Nazim}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|blp=no|listas=Haqqani, Nazim|
{{WikiProject Turkey|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Biography |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Islam |importance=Low |Muslim-scholars=yes |Muslim-scholars-importance=Mid |Sunni-Islam=yes}}
{{WikiProject Turkey |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Mysticism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Spirituality |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Archives|auto=short|search=yes|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/Nazim Al-Haqqani|bot=ClueBot III|age=365}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|age=8760|archiveprefix=Talk:Nazim Al-Haqqani/Archive|numberstart=2|maxarchsize=75000|header={{Automatic archive navigator}}|minkeepthreads=3|minarchthreads=2|format= %%i}}
<!-- Update the bot settings if you move the page, see WP:POSTMOVE. -->


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
== Consolidating articles ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
There is an almost identical page about this person at; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazim_al-Qubrusi The goal, once I investigate the proper proceedure, is to consolidate that previous page with this correctly titled page. The name Nazim al-Qubrusi is not widely used and the Mawlana Sheikh Nazim Al-Haqqani is what 99% of the people who know him, refer to him as. If you can offer advise on how to consolidate these pages or point to an area where to learn more, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you!!
* [[commons:File:Tomb of Shaykh Nazim.jpg|Tomb of Shaykh Nazim.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-09-08T20:26:02.341907 | Tomb of Shaykh Nazim.jpg -->
:The redirect has been done already on Aug 26, 2010. --[[User:Edoe|Edoe]] ([[User talk:Edoe|talk]]) 22:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tomb of Shaykh Nazim.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 20:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
==Proposal for deletion==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
I have removed the proposal for deletion. I redirected the other article to this one, made some changes here to get rid of some [[WP:peacock]] terms and added some wikilinks. If he is the Grandsheik of the Naqshbandi-Haqqani Golden Chain he is definitely notable, but this article needs some references.[[User:Editor2020|Editor2020]] ([[User talk:Editor2020|talk]]) 01:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
* [[commons:File:Sayyid Nazim Adil.jpg|Sayyid Nazim Adil.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-09-23T21:58:38.801520 | Sayyid Nazim Adil.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sayyid Nazim Adil.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 21:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


==Muhammad Ali is a follower==
== Edit ==


I see the name appears of Muhammad Ali[7] as a follower, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazim_Al-Haqqani, I like to point out Ali was not a member or follower of this organisation, they simply went said they'll do prayers and filmed it and made out as if Ali became a follower which he was not. You can confirm this with Ali's wife Lonnie. Ali was interested in Sufism in general not a member of a particular group. This group are using his name to promote themselves saying Ali became a member when he was not. Ali did prayers with many different people and groups it doesn't mean he was member of all. In a YouTube video members of this group holding Ali's hand and chanting prayers and Ali could not even speak due to illness he had. Ali did prayers with many different people and groups. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Annayoung2800|Annayoung2800]] ([[User talk:Annayoung2800#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Annayoung2800|contribs]]) 11:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Please edit the following:


:Fair enough. As you say, that information was unsupported by a reliable source - just a youtube video of a visit, which could mean a multitude of things. That's removed now. [[User:Iskandar323|Iskandar323]] ([[User talk:Iskandar323|talk]]) 12:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
His Majesty Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei. His Highness Sri Sultan Hamengkubuwono X of Yogyakarta and several members of Malaysia's royal families, including His Highness Prince Raja Dato' Seri Ashman Shah have taken initiation into the Naqshbandi-Haqqani Order at his hand.

Value latent language should be avoided on an academic website such as this. There is no such person or thing called "his majesty" or "highness" or "prince". Furthermore, royal titles are somewhat controversial and forbidden in Islam, even though the usage of these terms/concepts frequently occurs in many places around the world.

I'm sure Sheikh Nazim would agree the only thing that truly deserves to be called majestic or royal, is the One. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.80.97.19|24.80.97.19]] ([[User talk:24.80.97.19|talk]]) 06:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Suggestions ==

It would be good to show some of the negative publicity to get the correct image of nazim due to the fact a very large population of the muslim world consider him to be heretic <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.174.236.100|94.174.236.100]] ([[User talk:94.174.236.100|talk]]) 05:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Both Rumi ''and'' Jilani? ==

Abdul Qadir Jilani was culturally Persian but racially Arab, while Rumi was culturally and racially Tajik Persian. Rumi was not a descendant of Jilani, so if the subject of this article is a descendant of both as claimed then it would have to be from the two different sides of his family. Haqqani, however, is a Turkish Cypriot.<br>

It's theoretically possible that he could be the descendant of both, but I am skeptical per [[WP:QUESTIONABLE]]. The given source is [[Hisham Kabbani]], a follower of Haqqani who said he became a spiritual leader after the prophet Muhammad called him on the phone and told him to. Given the heavy focus of lineage and familial ties in Sufism, it's within the realm of possibility that the claim is apocryphal or merely an embellishment. Until a second source can be found, his lineage really shouldn't be stated as absolute fact but rather as Kabbani's personal view. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 03:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
:[[User:MezzoMezzo]], I've added a second source. Does that suffice? I'm very new to Wikipedia, and I actually made the edit before looking at the talk page. The last time I do that I hope. There is no source at present that questions that at least Haqqani himself traced his lineage as such. Is that enough for us to at least put the attribution in his mouth rather than only that of his follower?[[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 14:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

== Fake Gurdjieff story ==

There seems to be some attempt to spread the false story that Haqqani was a teacher and associate of G.I.Gurdjieff. A similar falsity is spread by the Haqqanis which say that Haqqani "was present during the meetings of his shaykh with Gurdjieff which led to the formation of the Gurdjieff spiritual movement and the Enneagram." This is a chronological absurdity. Haqqani was born in 1922 and met his his teacher, Shaykh Abdullah Daghestani, for the first time in 1945. Gurdjieff started teaching his system in Russia c. 1914 and spent all his time in Europe, England and America after 1922; he died in 1949. Haqqani would never have met him. These stories seem to be based on an unsubstantiated account found in a book that came out in 1995 written by Haqqani's deputy, Sheikh Kabbani-- not an objective source-- which claims that in 1920, Gurdjieff, while temporarily living in Turkey, visited Sheikh Sharafuddin Daghestani, who was the teacher of Sheikh Abdullah Daghestani. The two of them supposedly met with Gurdjieff at that time, before Haqqani was even born. Later, in the 1950's, years after Gurdjieff's death, J.G. Bennett met with Abdullah Daghestani in Damascus, a meeting described in Bennett's book Witness. Neither Sheikh Haqqani nor the supposed 1920 meeting between Gurdjieff and the two Daghestani Sheikhs are mentioned in Bennett's account. [[User:Jlburton|Jlburton]] ([[User talk:Jlburton|talk]]) 06:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC)jlburton <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jlburton|Jlburton]] ([[User talk:Jlburton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jlburton|contribs]]) 06:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:[[User:Jlburton]], your explanation does make sense. Had I been aware of all this, I wouldn't have reverted you like I did. Thanks for clarifying the reasoning, this helps to improve the article. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 03:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
:[[User:Jlburton]] What is your source for the quote attributed to the Haqqani's above? "was present during the meetings of his shaykh with Gurdjieff which led to the formation of the Gurdjieff spiritual movement and the Enneagram." [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 17:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

== Inclusion in [[The 500 Most Influential Muslims]] ==

Haqqani was named among the world's top 50 most influential muslims in every year of this annual publication prior to his death in 2014, i.e. 2009:49th, 2010:49th, 2011:48th,
2012:45th, and 2013:42nd. The individual publications are available in pdf form behind a email gateway on the website I've referenced. Is that sufficient reference or do I need to go and refer to each annual pdf as its own physical book? Thanks in advance for your patience. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 13:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
:{{ping|Bapehu}}, each individual reference is a lot of work for a point which I don't think anyone will dispute. If someone wants to dig up all the various references than fine, but that probably isn't necessary. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 03:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

== Biography of a Living Person? ==

Dear [[User:GimliDotNet]] and all: The [[WP:BLP]] guideline clearly states 4.5.1 that the policy also applies to the recently deceased. Haqqani passed away in May of this year. Why would we not apply BLP? I am a newby and trying to understand the criteria. Thanks. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 21:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

: That policy relates to particularly contentious information, the removed information was not particularly contentious. [[User:GimliDotNet|<font color="000001">'''GimliDotNet''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:GimliDotNet|<font color="FF0000">Speak to me]],[[Special:Contributions/GimliDotNet|Stuff I've done</font>]])</sup> 21:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
::[[User:GimliDotNet]] I'm not sure. This source of questionable reliability, esp. for quotations of the subject, is putting in subjects mouth that he has made repeated specific predictions which have failed. Source says that subject himself sources these predictions to Muslim prophet Muhammad. This is particularly contentious because this subjects noteworthiness is based on his position as a Muslim cleric. The clear implication is that he is that this Muslim cleric would in effect attribute a lie to the central figure of the religion, its prophet Muhammad. Is this not particularly contentious? [[User: MezzoMezzo]]: care to weigh-in? [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 03:38, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:::The subject of the article is dead, so BLP doesn't apply. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 03:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

== Naming convention in the article subject "Shaykh Nazim" vs "Haqqani" vs "Adil" ==

I'm intending to change the naming convention used in this article. The sources do not indicate that subject's surname is Haqqani. Rather, it is "Adil". "al Haqqani" appears an honorific he acquired at some point. The various academic secondary source material I have available, which I will be adding to the article, refers to him throughout as "Shaykh Nazim". As per the exception to WP:Honorific, he should be referred throughout the article as "Shaykh Nazim" like "Mother Theresa" or "Father Coughlin". i.e. He certainly appears to be much better known as "Shaykh Nazim" than "Haqqani" (I can find no source that uses this convention over "Shaykh Nazim", save WP) or "Adil" (his true surname). [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 22:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

:According to [[WP:HONORIFIC]], the exception does depend on how sources refer to the subject. We still need to look more closely at that, though; do the sources refer to the subject as such or not? I would prefer to see that demonstrated before jumping to an exception rather than sticking with a general rule. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 04:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

::{{cite book|last=Böttcher|first=Annabelle|chapter=Religious Authority in Transnational Sufi Networks: Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi al-Haqqani al-Naqshbandi|editor1-last=Krämer|editor1-first=Gudrun|editor2-last=Schmidte|editor2-first=Sabine|title=Speaking for Islam: Religious Authorities in Muslim Societies|date=2006|publisher=Brill|location=Leiden|pages=241-268|isbn= 900414949X|url=http://books.google.com/books?isbn=900414949X|accessdate=November 24, 2014}} refers to him consistently as "Shaykh Nazim. This is a strong source: Brill publisher, editor of the volume [[Gudrun Krämer]] is the co-editor of the the [[Encyclopaedia of Islam]]. The author draws broadly from the available primary sources, trying to resolve contradictory information across sources where it appears, and getting into the biography vs hagiography discussion. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 05:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:::Well one source isn't enough, though discovering "enough" is probably easier than even reading individual sources. Just run searches for books and academic publishings for the various terms ("Shaykh Nazim," "Nazim al-Haqqani," "Nazim Adil," etc.) and see what comes up the most. It will likely take much less time than sifting through individual books. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 06:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

::::I guess I'm still not sure what degree of detail is appropriate to demonstrate a point like this. Just looking at the number of results on Google Books for example for the various terms does not appear to be instructive: i.e. there is a problem with the methodology in that the number of results is the ''number of individual sources'' with at least one mention of the search term (e.g. "Shaykh Nazim" or "Nazim al-Haqqani"), not the total number number of uses of the term ''across all sources''. Almost every relevant source uses "shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani" at least once, which is itself a positive hit for both of our proposed terms. Upon going into each of the sources, its clear that on subsequent mentions, "Shaykh Nazim" is the preferred usage. Nearly all the academic sources I can find use "Shaykh Nazim". I can only find a handful that use "al-Haqqani" on subsequent mentions. "Nazim al-Haqqani" is used on the initial mention and almost never without "shaykh". [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 07:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Bapehu}}, there are other ways to search most commonly found terms with specific engines and sources, but it's been at least a year since I have personally done that and I don't quite remember how. Perhaps it could be something both you and I need to figure out down the road for future use. Upon review, what you're saying now is reasonable, nobody has any reason to doubt it and I don't have a reason to dispute your claim. In a case like this, you're probably safe executing this proposed change from now without waiting since you have done your part here on talk. If nobody responded at all I would say wait another day or two, but discussion happened so you can probably edit now and if anyone wants to dispute the change later - highly unlikely but theoretically possible - then just deal with it then. It seems like a fair enough way to do it. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 03:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

::::::{{ping|MezzoMezzo}}, cool. Thanks for your help. In the meantime, I found the Google Ngram tool, https://books.google.com/ngrams/. This appears to be potentially a very useful tool because it has access to the total frequency of a given term within a corpus of a given language. However, its output doesn't make that pure frequency analysis available to the user, from what I can tell. Rather, given a search term of a given class, it outputs the percentage that term makes up in that classes. Classes are 1-word strings, 2-word strings, etc. So, if I understand correctly, comparing, e.g., "Shaykh Nazim" and "al-Haqqani" with this tool, might be misleading: i.e. the "Shaykh Nazim" graph will show the percentage of total two-word strings that are "Shaykh Nazim, while that for "al-Haqqani" would be the % of one-word strings it accounts for. The problem, to my mind, is that the sample size of one-word strings is necessarily twice that of two-word strings. Assuming, for example, that "Bart Simpson" appears an equal number of times in the corpus as "cartoon", the n-gram for Bart Simpson would be twice as high because the corpus must contain 1/2 the number of 2-word strings as it does one word strings. This tool would, however, be immediately useful for comparing frequency of equal-word-length strings (see https://books.google.com/ngrams/info).
::::::Regardless, this tool has other great features. e.g. searching "Shaykh *" will give the top ten two word strings that start with "Shaykh". I imagine this has been discussed at length elsewhere on wikipedia. I'll see what I can find that has probably been laid out more succinctly and thoroughly on the subject. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 14:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

== Cleanup proposal ==

Issues: Lead includes information not in the body and doesn't follow WP:MoS. Although there is ample secondary sources from academic literature on this subject, they are not included. The article as a whole reads more like the ruins of edit battles between his followers and detractors (who have not been following WP guidelines and failed to source properly), and more experienced WP editors who step in and remove poorly sourced material. The end result is an article lacking cohesion with an unbalanced treatment of the subject: e.g. he was notable enough to be regularly counted among the 50 most influential Muslims in the world, but the article doesn't really tell us why. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 23:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

== New section: International mission ==

I've renamed "Travels abroad" as international mission. This tries to capture one of the main features of the subject discussed in the source material: his remarkable, for a sufi shaykh, trans-national appeal. He's from the Turkish speaking world. He then moves to Syria to live with his ''murshid'', serving as his entree into the greater Arabic context. Upon his murshid's passing, he becomes the ''murshid'' of the sufi order and begins spending several months each year in London, England, which the sources describe as his key move to not just the English context but the greater European context, especially in Germany. From 1973, he is described as having two headquarters: London and Damascus (later Cyprus). See the Boettcher source. '''At present, the key London connection is absent from the wikipedia article and must be added.''' From 1990 on, he begins travelling more extensively in both the US and the greater Muslim world (e.g. Caucasus, Central Asia, South Africa).

The relevance of including detailed information about his travels is that he was building the sufi network. It is noteworthy because it is exceptional historically for Sufi shaykhs and because he was reconnecting with other branches of the historic Naqshbandi tariqa. This is all in Boettcher.

Boettcher also is also seems a very good source for biography where she draws broadly from the available primary sources, trying to resolve contradictory information across sources where it appears, and getting into the biography vs hagiography discussion. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 03:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:{{ping|Bapehu}}, this is too much. When it comes to controversial topics - and Haqqani is controversial due to weird disputes within his group which pop up here every few months - it's better to only discuss one proposed change at a time, and only to move on to a new one after consensus has been achieved for sure. An example of this is [[Talk:Qamaruzzaman Azmi]]; I would post a proposal, then wait for discussion. If someone responded, we worked things out. If nobody responded after three days, I would carry on. I would not open a new proposal until the previous one had been resolved. It's much better and easier to manage that way, and even though it's more time consuming it also cements said changes more firmly because it demonstrates that any and all disputes have been resolved (or never existed in the first place). [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 04:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
::[[User:MezzoMezzo]] Got it. Thanks. Edit: I just now read through that talk page, and it was extremely beneficial (and pretty funny at moments). I made the page a favourite for future reference. [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 04:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

== Predictions section source problems - POV and SPS ==

This section is made up of quotes attributed to Shaykh Nazim. The sole source for this section is Vadillo, a secondary source that is clearly polemical towards Nazim, i.e. title of book is "Esoteric Deviation in Islam" of of which Nazim is supposed to be a prime example. I cannot find a single 3rd party review of this book, save for two anonymous forum postings. worldcat.org shows the book held by 6 libraries.

Moreover, it's an weighty attribution. Vadillo is putting in subject's mouth that he has made repeated specific predictions which have failed. Source says that subject himself sources these predictions to Muslim prophet Muhammad. This is particularly contentious because this subject's noteworthiness is based on his position as a Muslim cleric. The clear implication is that he is that this Muslim cleric would in effect attribute a lie to the central figure of the religion, its prophet Muhammad. I think this qualifies as [[WP:EXCEPTIONAL]].
Additionally, the Vadillo source appears to be SPS. I can find no reference to Madina House publisher except for publications of [[Murabitun World Movement]]. [[Umar Vadillo|Vadillo]] appears to be a principal of this organization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Umar_Vadillo#Sources). [[User:Bapehu|Bapehu]] ([[User talk:Bapehu|talk]]) 05:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:10, 10 February 2024


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Ali is a follower

[edit]

I see the name appears of Muhammad Ali[7] as a follower, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazim_Al-Haqqani, I like to point out Ali was not a member or follower of this organisation, they simply went said they'll do prayers and filmed it and made out as if Ali became a follower which he was not. You can confirm this with Ali's wife Lonnie. Ali was interested in Sufism in general not a member of a particular group. This group are using his name to promote themselves saying Ali became a member when he was not. Ali did prayers with many different people and groups it doesn't mean he was member of all. In a YouTube video members of this group holding Ali's hand and chanting prayers and Ali could not even speak due to illness he had. Ali did prayers with many different people and groups. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annayoung2800 (talk • contribs) 11:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. As you say, that information was unsupported by a reliable source - just a youtube video of a visit, which could mean a multitude of things. That's removed now. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nazim_Al-Haqqani&oldid=1205576603"