Talk:Classified information: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1) |
Tag: |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=No|class=C| |
||
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech |
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Espionage|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Law |
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Open Access |
{{WikiProject Open Access|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Intel=y}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Classified information/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Classified information/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== doesn't match what www.clearedconnections.com uses == |
|||
The www.clearedconnections.com job site uses: |
|||
*Confidential |
|||
*Secret |
|||
*Top Secret |
|||
*Top Secret/EBI |
|||
*Top Secret/SBI |
|||
*Top Secret/SSBI |
|||
*Top Secret/SCI |
|||
*Top Secret/SCI with CI Polygraph |
|||
*Top Secret/SCI with Full Scope Polygraph |
|||
So that would be 9 levels, at least in practice. (plus "unclassified" of course) Are they just being messed up, or have they summed things up pretty well? |
|||
A: No there are only three levels of clearances - confidential, secret, and top-secret. The information after the "/" tells you what type of background check was required. TS/SCI with Counter-intel polygraphs require a different type of investigation from the TS/Single Scope Background Investigation. The different investigations are usually because you need to have access to different types of information or have special intelligence risks involved that need to be examined for conflicts. |
|||
I have not seen EBI lately - but it means extended background check. |
|||
TS/SBI = TS + Full lifestyle (full scope) poly (the super procto of intel clearances) |
|||
TS/SSBI - Single Scope Background Investigation - standard TS clearance* |
|||
*From http://www.fas.org/sgp/backchek.htm: "Under the provisions of National Security Directive 63 (NSD-63) of 21 October 1991, the Single Scope Background Investigation (SBI) was instituted as the minimum scope and standard for all agencies and departments for access for Collateral Top Secret (TS) / National Security Information and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) or for participation in certain other Special Access Required (SAR) and Extremely Sensitive Information (ESI) programs, replacing both the BI and SBI." Thus TS/SBBI is not the minimum protocol for TS and TS/SBI has been supplanted. |
|||
SCI - Sensitive Compartmented Information - additional checking done after the TS/SSBI is completed. |
|||
TS/SCI/CI - Counter intelligence poly - should be obvious what's the issue here... |
|||
Finally - unclassified isn't a sensitivity... that is the default for information. |
|||
[[User:65.34.186.143|65.34.186.143]] 1 July 2005 23:08 (UTC) |
|||
== No Eyes == |
|||
I've seen references in the media and on websites to something called "No Eyes" - a document that is created or during or in preparation for a top secret meeting, but then destroyed at the end of the meeting. The name "no eyes" obviously comes from the fact that the participants of that meeting can say "nobody has seen it and it does not exist" in order to provide the highest level of deniability, even to those within an organisation's own ranks. Can anyone verify the existance of such a priniple, or is it one of those things that is rumoured but cannot be cited as it itself does not officially exist? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.14.89.251|86.14.89.251]] ([[User talk:86.14.89.251|talk]]) 21:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:What's the point of "No Eyes"? Does that mean that the information can only be delivered verbally? Perhaps you're confusing it with "Eyes Only", meaning it may be read by the recipient, but no notes or copies may be made.—[[User:Hydrargyrum|Quicksilver]]<sup>[[User_talk:Hydrargyrum|T]] [[Special:Emailuser/Hydrargyrum|@]]</sup> 18:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
TV series 'Spooks' S04E10 contains such a document <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.83.62.85|81.83.62.85]] ([[User talk:81.83.62.85|talk]]) 18:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I would imagine that the point is to follow legal process (e.g. getting a FISA warrant or similar) on a highly sensitive operation, but due to that sensitivity the warrant document (or whatever type of document it is) cannot be archived, and is destroyed after the meeting ends or when the operation is complete. [[Special:Contributions/81.144.191.22|81.144.191.22]] ([[User talk:81.144.191.22|talk]]) 16:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Confusing statement == |
|||
If anyone can figure out what 193.158.84.4 meant in his edit of 2011 March 24 23:37, please restore the following paragraph to the International section. |
|||
:In cases where a country wishes to share classified information bilaterally (or multilaterally) with a country that has a sharing agreement, the information is with the countries it can be shared with. Those countries would have to maintain the classification of the document at the level originally classified (TOP-SECRET, SECRET, etc.) with the appropriate caveat (USNZ, AUSGE, CANUK, etc.). |
|||
It is unclear what is meant by "...the information is with the countries it can be shared with." |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
[[User:Westley Turner|WesT]] ([[User talk:Westley Turner|talk]]) 22:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on [[Classified information]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=686198911 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050601030559/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca:80/pubs_pol/gospubs/TB_J2/dwnld/spmh_e.rtf to http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/gospubs/TB_J2/dwnld/spmh_e.rtf |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061201013917/http://www.csb.gov.hk:80/hkgcsb/doclib/general.pdf to http://www.csb.gov.hk/hkgcsb/doclib/general.pdf |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081227080400/http://www.hab.gov.hk:80/en/publications_and_press_releases/press_releases_speeches/equal_opportunities/191103q3.htm to http://www.hab.gov.hk/en/publications_and_press_releases/press_releases_speeches/equal_opportunities/191103q3.htm |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 17:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Classified information]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=748582430 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807094949/http://www.dss.mil:80/isp/odaa/nispom06.html to http://www.dss.mil/isp/odaa/nispom06.html |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510051228/http://badge.lanl.gov/uk-usa_classification.shtml to http://badge.lanl.gov/uk-usa_classification.shtml |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Classified information]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=751482480 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030155345/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_liberty/attack_sigint.pdf to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_liberty/attack_sigint.pdf |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.uscg.mil/petaluma/e-pme/e-pme/apprentice/G-Lessons/4-G-03.pdf |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://ssi-iss.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/questions/esp-pss-eng.html#q4 |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=25487§ion=text=True to http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=25487§ion=text=True |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 00:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:37, 10 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Categories:
- C-Class Freedom of speech articles
- High-importance Freedom of speech articles
- C-Class Espionage articles
- High-importance Espionage articles
- C-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Open access articles
- Mid-importance Open access articles
- WikiProject Open Access articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles