Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tags |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Scientology}}. Tag: |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
||
{{WikiProject Books|needs-infobox=}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Scientology|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== See also == |
|||
The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC). |
|||
:Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC). |
|||
:::''"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation."'' - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC). |
|||
::::Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Assessment comment== |
|||
{{Substituted comment|length=105|lastedit=20070326070126|comment= |
|||
*1 img, 4 citations, could use expansion, more citations. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC).}} |
|||
Substituted at 08:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:31, 10 February 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tom Cruise: Unauthorized article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
See also
[edit]The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- "Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
- Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| *1 img, 4 citations, could use expansion, more citations. Smee 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC). |
Last edited at 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)