Jump to content

Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Raeft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Scientology}}.
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WPBooks|class=Stub|needs-infobox=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject Books|needs-infobox=}}
{{Scientology|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Scientology|importance=Low}}
}}


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 8: Line 10:


:Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
:Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
::I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
:::''"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation."'' - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! [[User:Smee|Smee]] 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

::::Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... [[User:Raeft|Raeft]] 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

==Assessment comment==
{{Substituted comment|length=105|lastedit=20070326070126|comment=
*1 img, 4 citations, could use expansion, more citations. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC).}}
Substituted at 08:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:31, 10 February 2024

See also

[edit]

The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*1 img, 4 citations, could use expansion, more citations. Smee 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Last edited at 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)