Talk:Whiteley: Difference between revisions
m Automatically signing comment made by 90.196.21.102 |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPUKgeo}}. Tag: |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WikiProject UK geography|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Please refrain from vandalising this page and the main article. This area is for proper discussion. |
Please refrain from vandalising this page and the main article. This area is for proper discussion. |
||
Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
Whiteley has no pubs, no cinema, no library & no banks. I think a balanced article would mention this. |
Whiteley has no pubs, no cinema, no library & no banks. I think a balanced article would mention this. |
||
[[User:LookerOn|LookerOn]] 11:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)LookerOn |
[[User:LookerOn|LookerOn]] 11:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)LookerOn |
||
Except that it has a pub (Parsons Collar) and a (mobile) library. Have you ever visited? |
Except that it has a pub (Parsons Collar) and a (mobile) library. Have you ever visited? |
||
'Whiteley is reported by the local health authority to have a higher than average rate of divorce and separation' |
|||
- but it is not easy to see what that has to do with the local health authority! [[User:CanOfWorms|CanOfWorms]] ([[User talk:CanOfWorms|talk]]) 20:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Is "Whiteley Matters" wrong to try and rewrite Whiteley's history? Tell us what you think. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TStanton|TStanton]] ([[User talk:TStanton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TStanton|contribs]]) 08:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Demographics == |
|||
The demographics section is misleading if based on 2001 census data: owner-occupation of homes in Britain is widely reported to have fallen massively since that year (arguably due to the boom in Buy-To-Let and the increasing unaffordability of houses to first-time buyers); plus there has been substantial immigration to the UK since then, and a person aged 44 in 2001 would be 55 now. In summary, 2001 was a long time ago so it's a bit misleading to present this as "this is how Whiteley is now". (Also, isn't Whiteley a little bigger now than it was in 2001?) It would be interesting to know if more up-to-date information is publicly available. [[Special:Contributions/46.208.117.27|46.208.117.27]] ([[User talk:46.208.117.27|talk]]) 19:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
I'm struck reading this article that it presents a very unbalanced view of this housing, business, and retail development. The Whitely development is not a town yet this article (which mostly reads like an estate agent's puffery) repeatedly refers to Whitely as a such. The area suffers significant transportation problems - isolated from the area around it, mostly dependent on a car-culture because of inherent infrastructure design (try accessing it by bicycle or on foot from the A27), and with only one major arterial road to it which has long traffic queues at peak morning and evening traffic times. |
|||
==Churches?== |
|||
Much of the work by its residents to establish it as a community and to improve access has been done in the face of indifference or opposition (both developers and councils), an article which includes the history of this would be welcome and offer some balance. Some details on its establishment as a parish would not be amiss. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/{{{IP|{{{User|90.196.21.102}}}}}}|{{{IP|{{{User|90.196.21.102}}}}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{IP|{{{User|90.196.21.102}}}}}}|talk]]) {{{Time|09:02, August 24, 2007 (UTC)}}}</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Parish Church, etc? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/36.11.224.224|36.11.224.224]] ([[User talk:36.11.224.224#top|talk]]) 16:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 01:58, 11 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Please refrain from vandalising this page and the main article. This area is for proper discussion.
Netarbiter 13:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Whiteley has no pubs, no cinema, no library & no banks. I think a balanced article would mention this.
LookerOn 11:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)LookerOn
Except that it has a pub (Parsons Collar) and a (mobile) library. Have you ever visited?
'Whiteley is reported by the local health authority to have a higher than average rate of divorce and separation'
- but it is not easy to see what that has to do with the local health authority! CanOfWorms (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Is "Whiteley Matters" wrong to try and rewrite Whiteley's history? Tell us what you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TStanton (talk • contribs) 08:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Demographics
[edit]The demographics section is misleading if based on 2001 census data: owner-occupation of homes in Britain is widely reported to have fallen massively since that year (arguably due to the boom in Buy-To-Let and the increasing unaffordability of houses to first-time buyers); plus there has been substantial immigration to the UK since then, and a person aged 44 in 2001 would be 55 now. In summary, 2001 was a long time ago so it's a bit misleading to present this as "this is how Whiteley is now". (Also, isn't Whiteley a little bigger now than it was in 2001?) It would be interesting to know if more up-to-date information is publicly available. 46.208.117.27 (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Churches?
[edit]Parish Church, etc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.224.224 (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)