Talk:Keith Building: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
PhotoCatBot (talk | contribs) m merging {{reqphotoin}} to {{reqphoto}}, by the PhotoCat |
Tag: |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{reqphoto|architecture|in=Cleveland}} |
|||
{{Architecture}} |
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Skyscrapers|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Theatre|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Cleveland |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== stub status == |
|||
i hate to be unnecessarily pedantic about this, but just because an article is very short does not make it a stub, particularly when accompanied by a completed infobox, referencing, subsections, images, and categories. please see [[wp:stub]] for a full description of what makes an article a stub vs. start. ...by any measure, this article is a 'start'. --[[User talk:emerson7|emerson7]] 16:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:I agree that this is a stupid thing to edit war over. WP:STUB says that "stub status usually depends on the '''length of prose text alone''' – lists, templates, images, and other such peripheral parts of an article are '''usually not considered''' when judging whether an article is a stub." (emphasis added) The article is all of four sentences long (and it could be shorter, since the National Register mention has been uncited since 2007 and could be removed). I don't see how it could be considered anything other than a stub. - [[User:EurekaLott|Eureka Lott]] 16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:58, 11 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
stub status
[edit]i hate to be unnecessarily pedantic about this, but just because an article is very short does not make it a stub, particularly when accompanied by a completed infobox, referencing, subsections, images, and categories. please see wp:stub for a full description of what makes an article a stub vs. start. ...by any measure, this article is a 'start'. --emerson7 16:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- I agree that this is a stupid thing to edit war over. WP:STUB says that "stub status usually depends on the length of prose text alone – lists, templates, images, and other such peripheral parts of an article are usually not considered when judging whether an article is a stub." (emphasis added) The article is all of four sentences long (and it could be shorter, since the National Register mention has been uncited since 2007 and could be removed). I don't see how it could be considered anything other than a stub. - Eureka Lott 16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Start-Class Skyscraper articles
- Low-importance Skyscraper articles
- WikiProject Skyscrapers articles and lists
- Start-Class Theatre articles
- Low-importance Theatre articles
- WikiProject Theatre articles
- Start-Class Cleveland articles
- Low-importance Cleveland articles
- WikiProject Cleveland articles