Talk:Against Our Will: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:20, 11 February 2024

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2020)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism High‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead

Neljack, everything in the lead is a summary of other material in the article. The material is definitely not a BLP violation. The statement, "but many of her arguments have been rejected or criticized by scholars" is objectively true and perfectly easy to support. If you believe that the sourcing should be made clearer, that can definitely be done. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to update this article. And have been going around in circles. I added info in draft form, got an error message, tried to fix that. Added new material and saved it. SuzeBrown (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown[reply]

My sources are impeccable. I offered a long cite to the material on the summary ad reception of Against Our Will in 1975 but it seems to have been rejected. SuzeBrown (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown[reply]

Thank you. Your edits were helpful, for the most part, although I have modified some of them. The exact number of pages an author spends discussing a subject is not a detail relevant to an encyclopedia article. Someone added a COI template to the lead of the article; I removed that, as apparently no evidence was provided to support it. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added it because SuzeBrown is only adding flattering information to an article about a book written by Susan Brownmiller. You don't see the similarity in names? Dammitkevin (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make accusations of COI without good evidence, Dammitkevin. There is nothing wrong with adding information about positive reviews of the book, as a neutrally written article should reflect both positive and negative views of its topic, per WP:NPOV. It isn't appropriate to make assumptions about what someone's user name might or might not mean. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=no|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|class=C|1=
+{{WikiProject Women in Red|150}}
-{{WPLIT}}
-{{WikiProject Women's History|class=stub|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Books |needs-infobox=no |needs-infobox-cover=no}}
-{{WikiProject Feminism|class=stub|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Women's History |importance=High |needs-image=no |needs-photo=no}}
+{{WikiProject Feminism |importance=High |needs-image=no |needs-photo=no}}
-{{WikiProject Law|class=Start|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Sociology|class=stub |importance=}}
+{{WikiProject Sociology |importance=Mid |needs-infobox=no}}
-{{WikiProject Psychology|class=stub|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject Psychology |importance=Low |needs-infobox=no}}
-{{WikiProject Gender Studies|class=stub}}
+{{WikiProject Gender studies |importance=Mid |needs-infobox=no |needs-image=no |needs-photo=no}}
+{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}}
-{{WPLAW}}
+{{WikiProject Women writers |importance=Low |needs-infobox=no |needs-photo=no}}
-{{WP Crime}}
 }}
+== Lead ==
+Neljack, everything in the lead is a summary of other material in the article. The material is definitely not a BLP violation. The statement, "but many of her arguments have been rejected or criticized by scholars" is objectively true and perfectly easy to support. If you believe that the sourcing should be made clearer, that can definitely be done. [[User:FreeKnowledgeCreator|FreeKnowledgeCreator]] ([[User talk:FreeKnowledgeCreator|talk]]) 02:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
+I am trying to update this article.  And have been going around in circles.  I added info in draft form, got an error message, tried to fix that.  Added new material and saved it.
+[[User:SuzeBrown|SuzeBrown]] ([[User talk:SuzeBrown|talk]]) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown
+My sources are impeccable.  I offered a long cite to the material on the summary ad reception of Against Our Will in 1975 but it seems to have been rejected.  [[User:SuzeBrown|SuzeBrown]] ([[User talk:SuzeBrown|talk]]) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown
+:Thank you. Your edits were helpful, for the most part, although I have modified some of them. The exact number of pages an author spends discussing a subject is not a detail relevant to an encyclopedia article. Someone [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Against_Our_Will&diff=783801475&oldid=783800967 added] a [[WP:COI|COI]] template to the lead of the article; I [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Against_Our_Will&diff=783827699&oldid=783827627 removed] that, as apparently no evidence was provided to support it. [[User:FreeKnowledgeCreator|FreeKnowledgeCreator]] ([[User talk:FreeKnowledgeCreator|talk]]) 22:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
+::I added it because [[User:SuzeBrown|SuzeBrown]] is only adding flattering information to an article about a book written by [[Susan Brownmiller]]. You don't see the similarity in names? [[User:Dammitkevin|Dammitkevin]] ([[User talk:Dammitkevin|talk]]) 00:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
+:::Please do not make accusations of COI without good evidence, Dammitkevin. There is nothing wrong with adding information about positive reviews of the book, as a neutrally written article should reflect both positive and negative views of its topic, per [[WP:NPOV]]. It isn't appropriate to make assumptions about what someone's user name might or might not mean. [[User:FreeKnowledgeCreator|FreeKnowledgeCreator]] ([[User talk:FreeKnowledgeCreator|talk]]) 00:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)