Jump to content

Talk:Blank Page: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Christina Aguilera}}, {{WikiProject Pop music}}, {{WikiProject Sia}}, {{WikiProject Songs}}, {{WikiProject Women in music}}.
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Article history
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
|action1=GAN
{{WikiProject Christina Aguilera|class=Start|importance=low}}
|action1date=23 June 2013
{{WikiProject Songs|class=Start}}
|action1link=Talk:Blank Page/GA1
{{maintained|{{user1|Calvin999}}}}
|action1result=listed
}}
|action1oldid=
{{dyktalk|9 December|2012|entry=... that according to Michael Gallucci for PopCrush, the [[Christina Aguilera]] song "'''[[Blank Page (song)|Blank Page]]'''" is a "show-stopper" and a "classic vocal performance"?}}


|action2=GTC
==DYK nomination==
|action2date=03:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Blank Page (song)}}
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Lotus (Christina Aguilera album)/archive1
|action2result=promoted

|ftname=Lotus (Christina Aguilera album)
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=songs|dyk1date=9 December 2012|dyk1entry=... that according to Michael Gallucci for PopCrush, the [[Christina Aguilera]] song "'''[[Blank Page (song)|Blank Page]]'''" is a "show-stopper" and a "classic vocal performance"?
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=
{{WikiProject Christina Aguilera|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Pop music|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Sia|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Songs}}
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=Low}}
}}


== Reviews ==
== Reviews ==
Line 14: Line 28:
*http://www.billboard.com/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story#/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story
*http://www.billboard.com/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story#/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story
*http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/thesound/a435214/christina-aguileras-new-album-lotus-first-listen.html
*http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/thesound/a435214/christina-aguileras-new-album-lotus-first-listen.html
[[User:Calvin999|<font color ="RED" face= "Verdana">'''AARON'''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="green">'''TALK '''</font></sup>]] 14:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
[[User:Calvin999|<span style="color:RED; font-family:Verdana;">'''AARON'''</span>]] [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><span style="color:green;">'''TALK '''</span></sup>]] 14:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

{{Talk:Blank Page/GA1}}

== Requested move 7 September 2015 ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was: '''withdraw''' per [[WP:SNOW]]. {{RMnac}} <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 10:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

----


* [[:Blank Page]] → {{no redirect|Blank Page (song)}}
* [[:Blank page (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Blank page}}
– I am not convinced that [[WP:DIFFCAPS]] is sufficient disambiguation and that the song is the primary topic of "blank page". <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 10:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

*'''Oppose''' - Looking at the disambiguation page, I can't see why this needs disambiguating. &nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 11:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''' this was released in Korea and reached 53, how on earth is it notable for an article. Looking in Google Books [https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22smashing+pumpkins%22+%22blank+page%22&num=10 The Smashing Pumpkins's song "Blank Page"] is at least as well known as Aguilera's. [[User:Sovereign Sentinel]] Better would be [[Blank Page (Christina Aguilera song)]] [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 13:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*:::Please see [[WP:NOTABLE]]. [[User:Dohn joe|Dohn joe]] ([[User talk:Dohn joe|talk]]) 14:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*:::: Just because it's South Korea and number, doesn't make it any less important than another chart in another country. People need to stop with the whole "It's not as if it wasn't number-one in America" thing. The world does not revolve around US-centricity. &nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 09:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
** [[Blank Page (Christina Aguilera song)]] would be a bad idea because the Smashing Pumpkins song does not have its own article. Anyway, I would argue that [[Intentionally blank page]] is the primary topic for "blank page". <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 13:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:SMALLDETAILS]]. Uppercase is used to distinguish articles all the time. [[User:Dohn joe|Dohn joe]] ([[User talk:Dohn joe|talk]]) 14:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:SMALLDETAILS]]. '''[[User:Calidum|<span style="font-family: symbol;"><span style="color:#0d254c">Calidum</span></span>]]''' 19:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per Calvin999, and per others mentioning SMALLDETAILS. [[User:Melonkelon|Melonkelon]] ([[User talk:Melonkelon|talk]]) 21:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' we seem to be missing an article on the "blank page" metaphor, which should probably be primary instead of 'intentionally blank page' -- [[Special:Contributions/70.51.202.113|70.51.202.113]] ([[User talk:70.51.202.113|talk]]) 06:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' upper case IS in fact sufficient disambiguation per WP:DIFFCAPS [[User:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b>]] ([[User talk:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#454545">talk</b>]] / [[Special:Contributions/SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#454545">edits</b>]]) 01:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Blank Page]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=747733637 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219094524/http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon to http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 01:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Blank Page]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=791670717 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121109120630/http://www.4music.com/news/news/6712/Review-Christina-Aguilera-Lotus to http://www.4music.com/news/news/6712/Review-Christina-Aguilera-Lotus

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 19:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:36, 11 February 2024

Good articleBlank Page has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBlank Page is part of the Lotus (Christina Aguilera album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 9, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to Michael Gallucci for PopCrush, the Christina Aguilera song "Blank Page" is a "show-stopper" and a "classic vocal performance"?
Current status: Good article

Reviews

[edit]

AARONTALK 14:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Blank Page/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) 03:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • It is a minimalist piano driven ballad; it received frequent comparisons to Aguilera's 2002 single "Beautiful", but received one negative comparison to Adele's song "Someone Like You", for sounding too similar vocally, lyrically and musically. ---> "Blank Page" is a minimalist piano-driven ballad which received frequent comparisons to Aguilera's 2002 single "Beautiful". However, the song received one negative comparison to Adele's song "Someone Like You" for sounding to similar vocally, lyrically and musically.
  • The song garnered strong critical acclaim from music critics. It was praised for it its simplistic arrangement and Aguilera's raw and strong vocal performance was complimented. ---> It garnered strong critical acclaim from music critics, who praised its simplistic arrangement as well as Aguilera's raw and strong vocal performance on the song.
  • The song peaked at number 53 on the South Korea international singles chart following the release of Lotus. ---> Upon the release of Lotus, "Blank Page" peaked at number 53...

Background and recording

[edit]
  • No issues found

Development

[edit]
  • "Blank Page" is the third album in which Aguilera and Furler have collaborated on material together for. ---> Album?
  • Later that year, they reunited to create a song to be included on the Burlesque soundtrack, a song called "Bound to You" ---> Later that year, they reunited to create a song to be included on the Burlesque soundtrack, which was called "Bound to You"
  • Aguilera was interview by Billboard when she attended the Billboard Film & TV Music Conference, Aguilera revealed that she views "Blank Page" as a more "vulnerable" version of her 2002 song, "Beautiful" ---> Aguilera was interviewed by Billboard when she attended the Billboard Film & TV Conference. There, Aguilera revealed...

Composition

[edit]
  • No issues found

Critical reception

[edit]
  • Mesfin Fekadu for The Huffington Post concurred with Hampp in the respect that she also thought that "Blank Page" was reminiscent of the songs co-written by Furler on Bionic, which she also described "that album's highlight". Fekadu further described the song as a "standout" ---> Remove the latter

Live performance, credits, charts

[edit]
  • Nothing found

Refs

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 7 September 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdraw per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



– I am not convinced that WP:DIFFCAPS is sufficient disambiguation and that the song is the primary topic of "blank page". sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blank Page. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blank Page. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]