Talk:Bolko I the Strict: Difference between revisions
→Name: name |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Middle Ages}}, {{WikiProject Poland}}. Tag: |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{WPBiography |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|living=no|listas=Bolko 01 The Strict|1= |
|||
|class=stub |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=yes}} |
|||
|priority= |
|||
⚫ | |||
|auto=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
}}{{ArticleHistory |
|||
|action1=GAN |
|||
|action1date=20:26, 5 September 2009 |
|||
|action1link=Talk:Bolko I the Strict/GA1 |
|||
|action1result=not listed |
|||
|action1oldid=311377149 |
|||
|dykdate=8 January 2009 |
|||
|dykentry=... that the [[Slavs|Slavic]] [[Duke of Silesia|Silesian Duke]] and monastic patron '''[[Bolko I the Strict|Bolko I]]''' encouraged [[Ostsiedlung#Silesia|German settlement in his region]] and patronised [[German poetry]]? |
|||
|views=1205 |
|||
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|||
|topic=History |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Name== |
==Name== |
||
The name "Bolko I the Strict" seems more correct. Anyway, one English hit for [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Bolko+I%2C+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer%22&btnG=Search+Books "Bolko I, Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer"] is as popular as one English hit for [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Bolko+I%2C+Duke+of+Swidnica%22&btnG=Search+Books "Bolko I, Duke of Swidnica"].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|< |
The name "Bolko I the Strict" seems more correct. Anyway, one English hit for [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Bolko+I%2C+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer%22&btnG=Search+Books "Bolko I, Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer"] is as popular as one English hit for [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Bolko+I%2C+Duke+of+Swidnica%22&btnG=Search+Books "Bolko I, Duke of Swidnica"].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </span>]]</span></sub> 15:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:<small>Moved by Piotrus from his talk page</small> |
:<small>Moved by Piotrus from his talk page</small> |
||
:This is not the most popular name [in English]. Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular [http://books.google.com/books?q=+Bolko+I+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer&btnG=Search+Books]. It also met the expectations of a large number of people about continental ducal titles. If it's the Germanoform style of the name that bothers you, then I guess can respect that given the transnational character of these rulers. But it would only be fair then, on both counts, to move [[Bolko II of Świdnica]] to [[Bolko II the Small]]. Regards, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
:This is not the most popular name [in English]. Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular [http://books.google.com/books?q=+Bolko+I+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer&btnG=Search+Books]. It also met the expectations of a large number of people about continental ducal titles. If it's the Germanoform style of the name that bothers you, then I guess can respect that given the transnational character of these rulers. But it would only be fair then, on both counts, to move [[Bolko II of Świdnica]] to [[Bolko II the Small]]. Regards, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I will admit that I have no major preference over "of place" and "the adjective", albeit my favorite solution is to have the adjective or both if possible. What about Bolko the adjective x of Świdnica? In that case, [[Bolko I the Strict of Świdnica]]? Seems the most informative. For the record, I have no problem with [[Bolko II the Small]]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|< |
::I will admit that I have no major preference over "of place" and "the adjective", albeit my favorite solution is to have the adjective or both if possible. What about Bolko the adjective x of Świdnica? In that case, [[Bolko I the Strict of Świdnica]]? Seems the most informative. For the record, I have no problem with [[Bolko II the Small]]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </span>]]</span></sub> 16:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
[edit conflict] Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular than 1, getting 9 hits [not one] [http://books.google.com/books?q=+Bolko+I+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer&btnG=Search+Books]; the exact form is obviously a wiki-ism. But OK, Bolko I the Strict is more in line with how Polish rulers named on wikipedia. This suggests also though that [[Bolko II of Świdnica]] should be moved to [[Bolko II the Small]]. Regards, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
[edit conflict] Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular than 1, getting 9 hits [not one] [http://books.google.com/books?q=+Bolko+I+Duke+of+Schweidnitz-Jauer&btnG=Search+Books]; the exact form is obviously a wiki-ism. But OK, Bolko I the Strict is more in line with how Polish rulers named on wikipedia. This suggests also though that [[Bolko II of Świdnica]] should be moved to [[Bolko II the Small]]. Regards, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Just a note: Bolko I was not a Polish ruler but a ruler of a independent duchy in a period of transition. This transition affected the duke too, who called himself "dux Slezie et domino Lewenberch", later also "de Fürstenberc". IMHO this transition should be included somehow since it's vital for the history of Silesia.[[User:Karasek|Karasek]] ([[User talk:Karasek|talk]]) 19:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
:Just a note: Bolko I was not a Polish ruler but a ruler of a independent duchy in a period of transition. This transition affected the duke too, who called himself "dux Slezie et domino Lewenberch", later also "de Fürstenberc". IMHO this transition should be included somehow since it's vital for the history of Silesia.[[User:Karasek|Karasek]] ([[User talk:Karasek|talk]]) 19:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Added original name == |
|||
I added original name. It's obvious that he didn't use English name and the original name is notable enough to be included. Since the germanised version of the name occurs very rarely I don't think it is notable enough for inclusion though.--[[User:Molobo|Molobo]] ([[User talk:Molobo|talk]]) 18:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:We don't know his "original name". Our only contemporary sources are seals and documents. Almost all of these sources in Silesia during his time are written in Latin, very few in German, none in Polish. Arguing that the Polish/German/Czech name was his "original name" is therefore pure speculation. |
|||
:PS: the seal shown on this page provides at least his "original" Latin title: Bolkonis dei gra(tia) dvcis Sl(es)ie et d(omi)ni de Wrstenberch (Wrstenberch = Fürstenberg = Fürstenstein = Książ). [[User:Karasek|Karasek]] ([[User talk:Karasek|talk]]) 19:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Bolko I the Strict]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=747969237 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/0001/bsb00016318/images/index.html?nativeno=431 |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/0001/bsb00016318/images/index.html?nativeno=431 |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202113121/http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Bolko/N=Jaworski@i@Swidnicki to http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Bolko/N=Jaworski@i@Swidnicki |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:28, 11 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bolko I the Strict article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bolko I the Strict was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 8, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Slavic Silesian Duke and monastic patron Bolko I encouraged German settlement in his region and patronised German poetry? |
Name
[edit]The name "Bolko I the Strict" seems more correct. Anyway, one English hit for "Bolko I, Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer" is as popular as one English hit for "Bolko I, Duke of Swidnica".--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Moved by Piotrus from his talk page
- This is not the most popular name [in English]. Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular [1]. It also met the expectations of a large number of people about continental ducal titles. If it's the Germanoform style of the name that bothers you, then I guess can respect that given the transnational character of these rulers. But it would only be fair then, on both counts, to move Bolko II of Świdnica to Bolko II the Small. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I will admit that I have no major preference over "of place" and "the adjective", albeit my favorite solution is to have the adjective or both if possible. What about Bolko the adjective x of Świdnica? In that case, Bolko I the Strict of Świdnica? Seems the most informative. For the record, I have no problem with Bolko II the Small. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit conflict] Bolko I Duke of Schweidnitz-Jauer (or variant) is more popular than 1, getting 9 hits [not one] [2]; the exact form is obviously a wiki-ism. But OK, Bolko I the Strict is more in line with how Polish rulers named on wikipedia. This suggests also though that Bolko II of Świdnica should be moved to Bolko II the Small. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just a note: Bolko I was not a Polish ruler but a ruler of a independent duchy in a period of transition. This transition affected the duke too, who called himself "dux Slezie et domino Lewenberch", later also "de Fürstenberc". IMHO this transition should be included somehow since it's vital for the history of Silesia.Karasek (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Added original name
[edit]I added original name. It's obvious that he didn't use English name and the original name is notable enough to be included. Since the germanised version of the name occurs very rarely I don't think it is notable enough for inclusion though.--Molobo (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- We don't know his "original name". Our only contemporary sources are seals and documents. Almost all of these sources in Silesia during his time are written in Latin, very few in German, none in Polish. Arguing that the Polish/German/Czech name was his "original name" is therefore pure speculation.
- PS: the seal shown on this page provides at least his "original" Latin title: Bolkonis dei gra(tia) dvcis Sl(es)ie et d(omi)ni de Wrstenberch (Wrstenberch = Fürstenberg = Fürstenstein = Książ). Karasek (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bolko I the Strict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/0001/bsb00016318/images/index.html?nativeno=431 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/0001/bsb00016318/images/index.html?nativeno=431 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202113121/http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Bolko/N=Jaworski@i@Swidnicki to http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Bolko/N=Jaworski@i@Swidnicki
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Middle Ages articles
- Mid-importance Middle Ages articles
- Start-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- Start-Class Poland articles
- Mid-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia Did you know articles