Talk:John Catron: Difference between revisions
m Added {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}, talk page general fixes & other cleanup per WP:TPL using AWB (9536) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Tennessee}}, {{WikiProject United States courts and judges}}. Tag: |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|living=no|listas=Catron, John|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography| |
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=}} |
||
⚫ | |||
|class=start |
|||
⚫ | |||
|listas=Catron, John |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
==old talk== |
|||
⚫ | |||
==Untitled== |
|||
⚫ | |||
==How many Supreme Court Justices were there?== |
==How many Supreme Court Justices were there?== |
||
Something in this article doesn't make sense. The article says that the Supreme Court was expanded in 1836 from 7 to 9 justices and Catron was the only one of the two appointees who accepted the post. Then when he died, in 1865, according to the article, Congress eliminated his seat taking the Court back to 9 from 10. But how did it get to 10? [[Special:Contributions/208.11.92.3|208.11.92.3]] ([[User talk:208.11.92.3|talk]]) 18:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
Something in this article doesn't make sense. The article says that the Supreme Court was expanded in 1836 from 7 to 9 justices and Catron was the only one of the two appointees who accepted the post. Then when he died, in 1865, according to the article, Congress eliminated his seat taking the Court back to 9 from 10. But how did it get to 10? [[Special:Contributions/208.11.92.3|208.11.92.3]] ([[User talk:208.11.92.3|talk]]) 18:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
* It was actually expanded to 10 when the Tenth Circuit was created in 1863. [[User:BD2412|< |
* It was actually expanded to 10 when the Tenth Circuit was created in 1863. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:tan;">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 19:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Dodgy February 1857 Buchanan letters== |
|||
The letters he exchanged with president-elect Buchanan in February 1857 were ethically dubious (violating principles of executive-judicial separation), and would have caused a big political scandal if they had been known at the time. As it says at [[Dred Scott v. Sandford#Influence of President Buchanan]], "Both by present-day standards and under the more lenient standards of the time, Buchanan's applying such political pressure to a member of a sitting court would be regarded as highly improper." There should be more on the letters, but I've at least added a bare mention of them... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 13:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[John Catron]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=776945625 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060130164255/http://www.supremecourthistory.org/02_history/subs_timeline/images_associates/021.html to http://www.supremecourthistory.org/02_history/subs_timeline/images_associates/021.html |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:03, 12 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
old talk
[edit]John Catron, is a confederate.... n ot a unioon party off -- 15:30, 17 October 2005 209.158.178.70
How many Supreme Court Justices were there?
[edit]Something in this article doesn't make sense. The article says that the Supreme Court was expanded in 1836 from 7 to 9 justices and Catron was the only one of the two appointees who accepted the post. Then when he died, in 1865, according to the article, Congress eliminated his seat taking the Court back to 9 from 10. But how did it get to 10? 208.11.92.3 (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- It was actually expanded to 10 when the Tenth Circuit was created in 1863. bd2412 T 19:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Dodgy February 1857 Buchanan letters
[edit]The letters he exchanged with president-elect Buchanan in February 1857 were ethically dubious (violating principles of executive-judicial separation), and would have caused a big political scandal if they had been known at the time. As it says at Dred Scott v. Sandford#Influence of President Buchanan, "Both by present-day standards and under the more lenient standards of the time, Buchanan's applying such political pressure to a member of a sitting court would be regarded as highly improper." There should be more on the letters, but I've at least added a bare mention of them... AnonMoos (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Catron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060130164255/http://www.supremecourthistory.org/02_history/subs_timeline/images_associates/021.html to http://www.supremecourthistory.org/02_history/subs_timeline/images_associates/021.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Tennessee articles
- Low-importance Tennessee articles
- Start-Class United States courts and judges articles
- Mid-importance United States courts and judges articles