Jump to content

Talk:Christmas card: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JackyR (talk | contribs)
Which Queen Mary?
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Holidays}}, {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}.
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not a forum}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Holidays|importance=High|Christmas=yes|Christmas-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Low|christmas=yes|christmas-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Visual arts}}
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[Christmas shopping#Shopping|shopping]]</nowiki> Anchor [[Christmas shopping#Shopping]] links to a specific web page: [[Shopping]].
}}

==move==
This should '''''not''''' have been moved here. "Christmas Card" with two upper case letters is its own disamibugation. -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]
This should '''''not''''' have been moved here. "Christmas Card" with two upper case letters is its own disamibugation. -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]


Line 28: Line 39:


Is this [[Queen Mary]] the [[Mary of Teck]], wife of George V, UK? Make clear? Cheers [[User:JackyR|JackyR]] 20:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Is this [[Queen Mary]] the [[Mary of Teck]], wife of George V, UK? Make clear? Cheers [[User:JackyR|JackyR]] 20:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
:Oh, good point! Certainly not the first, I don't think she had much leisure time. Fixed. (With link.) [[User:Lindmere|Lindmere]] 18:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

== Commercial and Personal Websites ==

Not surprisingly, this page attracts a fair amount of linkspam from ecard and other card purveyors. I added an External Links section for historical archives and other material that does not relate directly to the article, but are relevant to the topic. I would suggest that noncommercial ecard and other sites are only worthy of links if they would significantly enhance the reader's understanding of past history or current trends in Christmas cards. [[User:Lindmere|Lindmere]] 16:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

== Snowy weather traditionally depicted in British cards a result of volcano activity in Victorian times ==

I've heard that the idea we have in Britain of Christmas being a time of snow was established during Victorian times, when the cards first became popular, and in writings by Dickens, was due to unusually cold weather at that time due to the eruption of a large volcano (Krakatoa?). In normal times, snow is quite rare on Christmas day in England, at least. Another thing I've heard is that this was due to Christmas being held in what we would now call January, prior to the change to the modern calendar. [[Special:Contributions/78.147.242.123|78.147.242.123]] ([[User talk:78.147.242.123|talk]]) 21:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Christmas card]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=678581500 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071208234007/http://www.jsonline.com:80/news/metro/dec04/286613.asp to http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/dec04/286613.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141028180539/http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/cards/ to http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/cards/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
have just added 1 external link on the Christmas eCard in the sense of article modification as well as I have fixed 2 citation links, one more thing please check out the "References Number 27". <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Motivatorss|Motivatorss]] ([[User talk:Motivatorss#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Motivatorss|contribs]]) 01:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 08:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:58, 12 February 2024

move

[edit]

This should not have been moved here. "Christmas Card" with two upper case letters is its own disamibugation. -- Zoe


The description here seems overly Jesus-centric; many Christmas cards in the US at least are based rather in the Santa Claus tradition. --Brion 03:43 Jan 20, 2003 (UTC)



In Japan, Christmas cards sometimes have pictures of Santa being crucified. :-)

I was devasted to hear that this is probably an urban myth. I suspect that if such a thing does nowadays exist, it is a deliberate joke based oin the original myth or story. Funny how many of the best stories end up not being true, isn't it? <sigh> Nevilley 17:48 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC)

There are Christmas Cards and there are christmas cards--know what i mean? this is not a proper name!

[I love this place. I love all disputes. I hope no one is angry!]

Arthur



I'm not angry, just confused. :) "Christmas" is a proper name. "Card" is not. Ergo, "Christmas card". (Except for the obscure album title, of course.) --Brion 03:56 Jan 20, 2003 (UTC)

So what's your problem? The generic item is here. We're fine, leave it alone. -- Zoe

Which Queen Mary?

[edit]

Is this Queen Mary the Mary of Teck, wife of George V, UK? Make clear? Cheers JackyR 20:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good point! Certainly not the first, I don't think she had much leisure time. Fixed. (With link.) Lindmere 18:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial and Personal Websites

[edit]

Not surprisingly, this page attracts a fair amount of linkspam from ecard and other card purveyors. I added an External Links section for historical archives and other material that does not relate directly to the article, but are relevant to the topic. I would suggest that noncommercial ecard and other sites are only worthy of links if they would significantly enhance the reader's understanding of past history or current trends in Christmas cards. Lindmere 16:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snowy weather traditionally depicted in British cards a result of volcano activity in Victorian times

[edit]

I've heard that the idea we have in Britain of Christmas being a time of snow was established during Victorian times, when the cards first became popular, and in writings by Dickens, was due to unusually cold weather at that time due to the eruption of a large volcano (Krakatoa?). In normal times, snow is quite rare on Christmas day in England, at least. Another thing I've heard is that this was due to Christmas being held in what we would now call January, prior to the change to the modern calendar. 78.147.242.123 (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Christmas card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Hello fellow Wikipedians, have just added 1 external link on the Christmas eCard in the sense of article modification as well as I have fixed 2 citation links, one more thing please check out the "References Number 27". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motivatorss (talkcontribs) 01:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]