Talk:The Cube, Birmingham: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject England}}, {{WikiProject West Midlands}}, {{WikiProject Architecture}}. Tag: |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Cube (building)|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject England|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WPE|nested=yes}} |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject West Midlands|importance=Low}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=Low}} |
||
{{architecture|nested=yes}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== Review Now Complete == |
|||
[[Category:Articles which may no longer need images|The Cube (building)]] |
|||
This page seems a little too detailed about the construction process, does anyone really care what the spacing of the piles is? |
|||
The page could do with a bit of a review, by someone who knows a little about the current state if the building and a lot of that construction detail should go. Anyone agree? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bs0u10e01|Bs0u10e01]] ([[User talk:Bs0u10e01|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bs0u10e01|contribs]]) 12:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Fire Safety == |
|||
Fire safety in tall buildings has become more of a public concern (due to the Grenfell fire) than when the Cube was built. It is worrying to read that there are locked fire doors keeping the tenant and owner-occupier wings apart. The cladding is described as made of polyester-coated or anodised aluminium, attached to the building by silicone, with insulation behind it. The link to the Building newspaper/magazine article that should give more details does not work. The manufacturers' websites emphasise sustainability, not safety. Considering that the top floors of this building are occupied by a three-to-four star hotel, it would be good to have some information in the article about fire protection. [[User:NRPanikker|NRPanikker]] ([[User talk:NRPanikker|talk]]) 20:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:39, 13 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review Now Complete
[edit]This page seems a little too detailed about the construction process, does anyone really care what the spacing of the piles is? The page could do with a bit of a review, by someone who knows a little about the current state if the building and a lot of that construction detail should go. Anyone agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs0u10e01 (talk • contribs) 12:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Fire Safety
[edit]Fire safety in tall buildings has become more of a public concern (due to the Grenfell fire) than when the Cube was built. It is worrying to read that there are locked fire doors keeping the tenant and owner-occupier wings apart. The cladding is described as made of polyester-coated or anodised aluminium, attached to the building by silicone, with insulation behind it. The link to the Building newspaper/magazine article that should give more details does not work. The manufacturers' websites emphasise sustainability, not safety. Considering that the top floors of this building are occupied by a three-to-four star hotel, it would be good to have some information in the article about fire protection. NRPanikker (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)