Talk:Amber Rudd: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:26, 13 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amber Rudd article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 28 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

This has been mentioned by a media organization:

Joy Lo Dico (18 May 2015). "Changing face of Amber". London Evening Standard. Who are these Wikipedia goblins changing history?

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Amber Rudd resigns as Work and Pensions Secretary

Resignation letter: https://twitter.com/AmberRuddHR/status/1170429481879842817?s=20 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49623737

Amber has resigned, saying she cannot "stand by" while "loyal moderate Conservatives are expelled".

In her resignation letter, she said she no longer believed leaving the EU with a deal was the government's "main objective".

She described the sacking of 21 Tory MPs on Tuesday as an "assault on decency and democracy".

In her resignation letter to the prime minister she said: "I joined your cabinet in good faith: accepting that 'No Deal' had to be on the table, because it was the means by which we would have the best chance of achieving a new deal to leave on 31 October.

"However I no longer believe leaving with a deal is the government's main objective."

Is she still the fastest-rising politician to a Great Office of State since the Second World War?

This article cites a 2016 source, which states that Rudd was (presumably, at the time of publication of the linked source) the fastest-rising politician to a Great Office of State (i.e. Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary, Home Secretary) since the Second World War - she became an MP in 2010, and was promoted to Home Secretary in 2016, which means her rise to a Great Office of State took slightly over 6 years. However, Rishi Sunak was elected as an MP in 2015, and became Chancellor of the Exchequer in 2020 - less than 5 years after becoming an MP. Is it worth updating this article to reflect this, or should we try to find a source to update Sunak's article? Or does no one care? Just wondering if this now-inaccurate piece of information was worth correcting.

wrong website

Sorra, but this website is no longer working: amberrudd.co.uk. Have a look please.--Cabanero (talk) 11:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Talk page header}}
 {{Controversial}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|blp=yes|listas=Rudd, Amber|1=
-{{WikiProject Biography |living=yes |class=C |listas=Rudd, Amber |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Journalism |class=C |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Low}}
-{{WP London |class=C |importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject London|importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom |class=C |importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=Mid}}
-{{WikiProject Sussex |class=C |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Sussex|importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Women |class=C |importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Women}}
 }}
 {{Press
@@ Line 26: / Line 27: @@
 }}
 {{archives|search=yes}}
 == Amber Rudd resigns as Work and Pensions Secretary ==
@@ Line 45: / Line 47: @@
 This article cites a 2016 source, which states that Rudd was (presumably, at the time of publication of the linked source) the fastest-rising politician to a Great Office of State (i.e. Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary, Home Secretary) since the Second World War - she became an MP in 2010, and was promoted to Home Secretary in 2016, which means her rise to a Great Office of State took slightly over 6 years. However, [[Rishi Sunak]] was elected as an MP in 2015, and became Chancellor of the Exchequer in 2020 - less than 5 years after becoming an MP. Is it worth updating this article to reflect this, or should we try to find a source to update Sunak's article? Or does no one care? Just wondering if this now-inaccurate piece of information was worth correcting.
+== wrong website ==
-==Social conservative==
+Sorra, but this website is no longer working: amberrudd.co.uk. Have a look please.--[[User:Cabanero|Cabanero]] ([[User talk:Cabanero|talk]]) 11:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
-Sorry but the idea that Amber Rudd is anyway a 'social conservative' is completely mad. The idea that controlling immigration, which was her job as Home Secretary, makes her 'socially conservative' is mad. It has been the position of every Home Secretary ever since the 1960s. Are we going to claim that Roy Jenkins was a social conservative? Or Ken Clarke? This is just silly and poor thinking and I urge people to refrain from writing Year 6 grade inaccuracies.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.149.15.19|86.149.15.19]] ([[User talk:86.149.15.19#top|talk]]) 16:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:Maybe so. But I think it's unwise for you to make edits like [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Amber_Rudd&diff=956670282&oldid=955745398 this one], before you gain a consensus here. Thanks. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC) p.s. the last IP from Lewisham, who made that identical edit, was asked to use an edit summary?