Jump to content

Talk:Fiduciary: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m POV
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,153,706 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Business}}, {{WikiProject Finance}}, {{WikiProject Law}}.
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{oldpeerreview}}
|action1=FAC
{{facfailed}}
|action1date=10:13, 23 February 2006
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fiduciary/archive1
|action1result=not promoted
|action1oldid=40813121


|action2=PR
==List of Relationships==
|action2date=20:35, 23 February 2006
Next on the list of To Do is to turn the list of relationships that usually carry a duty into a definition list... explain why the duty is presumed, the historical origin of the presumption, etc. etc.
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Fiduciary/archive1
|action2result=reviewed
|action2oldid=40866838


|currentstatus=FFAC

}}
is the relationship between husband and wife fiduciaral ?
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
answer: It is not presumed to be fiduciary relationship, but may be easily established. shall include this in next edit --[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 03:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Law|importance=Top}}
== Overhaul ==
}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Fiduciary/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
I have done away with the old text and introduced a new version of the article which is more comprehensive and accurate. I have stuck to the basic principles of fiduciary duties, this is because the law w/regard to equity - and fiduciary principles, especially - can differ greatly between Canada, UK, US, and Australia.
--[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 03:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Please note that I have not yet inserted footnotes or general links --[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 03:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I like the overhaul generally, but I think it was a bit much to make it essentially an article about UK law. The Salmon v. Meinhard quote is probably the most-used definition in the US, and I think it would be appropriate to include it. What I would prefer to see is a "General/Historical" section, and then sections on law in various jurisdictions. [[User:Cprovenzano|cpro]] 17:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


cpro - i tried to only do the basics so that its accurate for all jursidictions... im not in america, so if you have some information for the USA jurisdiction that you would like to see in there then thats cool. by the salmon v meinhard, are you referring to "a level higher than that trodden by the crowd"?? i already have that quote in there... not sure what you mean there. General historical section is a very good idea. w/regard to jurisdictions, perhaps we can arrange the article so that the majority of the article describes common features to all jurisdictions... then note major jurisdictional differences at the end? cheers for the feed back --[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 06:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

== Vanity? ==
Who are Melanie Jizzle and Philip Fizzler? That MUST be a prank. I'm going to remove them.

[[User:qweryqwery|qweryqwery]]

*I think the page may have been written by law students. It is common for lawyers to use fictious names to describe how a law operates. It appears as though the names are not vanity but force of habit. I would perhaps reword to use fiducary and person, etc.

*I think that "force of habit" is being excessively charitable. Fictitious names are usually sensical. "Paul" is the Plaintiff, "Daniel" is the Defendant; "Tim" is the Testator, "Gene" is the Grantee; Vic usually winds up being the victim of something in Bar Exam problems, and Axel likely faces criminal liability as an accessory. See the article on computer programming names, where such names are identified as "essentially metasyntactical variables." But a full first and last name? There's no explanation. I vote for removal, replacing with, as suggested, "fiduciary" and "beneficiary."--[[User:64.80.112.170|64.80.112.170]] 14:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

*I didn't make it beyond the opening sentence: "Fiduciary in common law jurisdictions, is a legal term used to describe a relationship of between [sic] a person who occupies a particular position of trust, power or responsibility with respect to the rights, property or interests..." Is readability such a terrible thing?[[User:195.47.86.1|195.47.86.1]] 05:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I cleaned up the intro somewhat. I think you should give the article another chance! [[User:204.177.90.3|204.177.90.3]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

==POV?==

"Canadian law, for example, has developed a cutting edge body of fiduciary case law, moreso than [[American & ANI law]], whilst Australian & ANI law and [[British law]] have developed more conservative approaches than either the USA or Canada."

Apart from the non-existence of "British law" or "American law", this seems pretty POV to me.
[[User:Legis|Legis]] 09:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:38, 14 February 2024

Former featured article candidateFiduciary is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 23, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fiduciary&oldid=1207217775"