Jump to content

Talk:Peggy Stewart (actress): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Biography
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|blp=no|listas=Stewart, Peggy|
{{WikiProject Biography |filmbio-priority=low |filmbio-work-group=yes |needs-photo=no}}
|living=no
{{WikiProject Westerns|importance=mid|Biography-task-force=yes}}
|class=Stub
{{WikiProject Women }}
|filmbio-priority=Low
{{WikiProject Florida |importance=Low}}
|filmbio-work-group=yes
|listas=Stewart, Peggy
|needs-photo=no
}}
}}


== Death ==
== Death ==

The only source of death is from the Brazilian blog [https://www.memoriascinematograficas.com.br/ Memórias Cinematográficas]. Is this a reliable source or did they just copy Wikipedia like many others (the only addition is that she died at her home)? This sounds strange for a death that occurred in the USA. [[User:Vincent Lefèvre|Vincent Lefèvre]] ([[User talk:Vincent Lefèvre|talk]]) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
The only source of death is from the Brazilian blog [https://www.memoriascinematograficas.com.br/ Memórias Cinematográficas]. Is this a reliable source or did they just copy Wikipedia like many others (the only addition is that she died at her home)? This sounds strange for a death that occurred in the USA. [[User:Vincent Lefèvre|Vincent Lefèvre]] ([[User talk:Vincent Lefèvre|talk]]) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


Line 23: Line 20:


::::::{{u|Folengo}} Sorry, my mistake. I initially saw the latest anonymous edit [[Special:Diff/899921916]], which added the death in the infobox, and did not see immediately that a source was added in a previous edit, then I reverted the other ones without checking carefully. But please, when doing a change in an article, add something useful in the summary (the log), which is what is visible in the history; yours was empty and this was not helpful. [[User:Vincent Lefèvre|Vincent Lefèvre]] ([[User talk:Vincent Lefèvre|talk]]) 09:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
::::::{{u|Folengo}} Sorry, my mistake. I initially saw the latest anonymous edit [[Special:Diff/899921916]], which added the death in the infobox, and did not see immediately that a source was added in a previous edit, then I reverted the other ones without checking carefully. But please, when doing a change in an article, add something useful in the summary (the log), which is what is visible in the history; yours was empty and this was not helpful. [[User:Vincent Lefèvre|Vincent Lefèvre]] ([[User talk:Vincent Lefèvre|talk]]) 09:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

:::::::Does not matter. Sorry for the missing summary. --[[User:Folengo|Folengo]] ([[User talk:Folengo|talk]]) 09:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

:::::::::I don't see any coverage this or anything. [[User:Matt Campbell|Matt Campbell]] ([[User talk:Matt Campbell|talk]]) 00:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:27, 14 February 2024

Death

[edit]

The only source of death is from the Brazilian blog Memórias Cinematográficas. Is this a reliable source or did they just copy Wikipedia like many others (the only addition is that she died at her home)? This sounds strange for a death that occurred in the USA. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Lefèvre, Blogs are generally not considered to be reliable sources for Wikipedia. A reliable source should be provided to support the information in question. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So I assume that the edits by Gianluigi02 and ThatBaileyLad about her supposed death should be reverted. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure go ahead but there was no need to tag me --ThatBaileyLad (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, done. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We used Aveleyman.com to update Meg Randall's page. The site has always been reliable and is not blacklisted (SAG-AFTRA or something similar later confirmed Randall's death), so don't revert edits pretending they are unsourced.--Folengo (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Folengo Sorry, my mistake. I initially saw the latest anonymous edit Special:Diff/899921916, which added the death in the infobox, and did not see immediately that a source was added in a previous edit, then I reverted the other ones without checking carefully. But please, when doing a change in an article, add something useful in the summary (the log), which is what is visible in the history; yours was empty and this was not helpful. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Does not matter. Sorry for the missing summary. --Folengo (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any coverage this or anything. Matt Campbell (talk) 00:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]