Talk:William Forsyth (barrister): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Tagging with {{WikiProject London}} based on membership in Category:Politics of Westminster per request Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/WikiProjectTagger |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject London}}. Tag: |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|living=no|listas=Forsyth, William|1= |
|||
{{WPBiography |
|||
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=|auto=yes}} |
|||
|living=no |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=yes}} |
|||
|class=stub |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
|priority= |
|||
|listas=Forsyth, William |
|||
|auto=yes |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
<!--removed New Zealand Project label---> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
==Brother== |
|||
Having added sources which establish his brother to have been Sir (Thomas) Douglas Forsyth, it's striking that this article image appears to be an artistic rendering of the photograph given at Sir Douglas's article! Either the two men were nearly identical- down to hairstyle- or the identity of the man in the image is unclear, presumably having been confused at some time in the past. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.145.173.147|78.145.173.147]] ([[User talk:78.145.173.147#top|talk]]) 19:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:20, 14 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Brother
[edit]Having added sources which establish his brother to have been Sir (Thomas) Douglas Forsyth, it's striking that this article image appears to be an artistic rendering of the photograph given at Sir Douglas's article! Either the two men were nearly identical- down to hairstyle- or the identity of the man in the image is unclear, presumably having been confused at some time in the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.173.147 (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)