Jump to content

Talk:French Canadians: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,726,605 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject Ethnic groups}}, {{WikiProject France}}, {{WikiProject United States}}.
 
(289 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
Corrected numerous mistakes based on a fallacious interpretation of historical data. French Canadians and Acadians are separated peoples. The first Canadians were the ''Canadiens'' who renamed themselves ''Canadiens-français'' and later again ''québécois'' during the [[Quiet Revolution]]. The Acadians became inhabitants of Canada in 1867 and therefore cannot be considered Canadians before that time. -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]]
{{WikiProject Canada|qc=Yes|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject France|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|FRAM=Yes|FRAM-importance=High}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:French Canadians/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}


== Map is terrible and needs to be replaced ==
Quote from the article: "''One of the motivations for the union was to limit French Canadian political power.''" What kind of POV unfounded rubbish is this?
The map given as an image in the navbox is terrible, inaccurate and misleads the readers ([[WP:Inaccuracy]]). Here are a few reasons why:
[[User:Angelique|Angelique]] 23:33, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)


# The map's percentages only go up to 10%. This heavily misleads the reader by not showing that this ethnicity makes up the majority of Quebec's population.
Do you prefer "One of the primary motivations for the union was the complete [[assimilation]] of French Canadians for their own good."? I thought this would pass as non-neutral, although that is what the Durham report clearly states as an objective. If you want to quote the Durham report, you are free to do it, but I garantee you that someone will eventually try to tone it down with something like "limiting French Canadian political power". -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 03:52, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)
# It uses the US and Canadian census as a source of information. However, the US census does not allow and has never allowed "French Canadian" to be picked as an ethnic group. This map is showing people who selected "French" descent, but presents it as though they selected "French Canadian". These ethnicities, though related, are different. This map is misleading the reader into believing that the US census gives "French Canadian" as an option, and that there are more people of this ethnicity there than there actually are. Though the image's description says this, most people will not read it.
# The map shows results from Canada and the US only, leaving out other areas where French Canadians can be found.
# It uses the US and Canadian census as a source of information. However, it is the 1990 US census and the 2016 Canadian census. These dates are very far apart. As the proportion of people with French Canadian ancestry is declining in both Canada and the US due to massive immigration, these mismatched dates are misleading because they lead the reader to believe that there are more people of this ethnicity in the US than there actually are.
# This map, on top of confusing people of "French-Canadian" and "French" descent together, does not make it clear if the Canadian data is only showing those of "French Canadian" and/or "French" ethnicity, or if groups such as [[Acadians]] and "[[Quebecois people|Quebecois]]" are included as well.


In short, this map has too many problems and misleads the reader too much to be acceptable. As stated on [[WP:Editing policy]]: "on Wikipedia a lack of information is better than misleading or false information". It should either be removed entirely, replaced with a better map, or replaced with an alternative image.


[[User:Safyrr|Safyrr]] ([[User talk:Safyrr|talk]]) 06:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
For me the flags all show up in a single right-aligned vertical column. I'm not an expert in wikipedia editing, but is there anyway they could be organized into multiple columns dependent on the width of the browser? I could table them into a fixed number of columns, but it would be nice if the number of columns could be window-size-dependent.
[[User:Willhsmit|Willhsmit]]


:Bonjour-hi {{ping|Safyrr}} ! Points 2, 3 and 5 do not seem very important to me. It is already specified on the map that for the United States, it was respectively the "French americans" and for Canada the "French Canadians" (even if one may wonder what the French americans are doing on an article talking about French Canadians ... Afterwards, as the majority of French Americans have Canadian ancestry (of Québec, Acadie), this is not completely insane). '''I am for the removal of the card. There are too many problems, especially points 1 and 4 that you mention.''' In itself, it's not that disturbing the date so far between the two. However, it must absolutely be specified in the legend. As for point one, in fact, we cannot accept this map, which pretends that Québec is a bit of a territory like any other for French Canadians. Other subject… I removed the term "Franco-Canadien" which is really used very very marginally in French (and is usually considered incorrect to speak of the French Canadian people), and I suffered the contestation of someone opposed to it. What do you think ? Apparently, even in English, it doesn't really say ("Franco-canadians" 15,000 results, "French canadians" 872,000 results ....).--[[User:Æpherys|Æpherys]] ([[User talk:Æpherys|talk]]) 08:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
==Semantics==


:: Hello {{ping|Æpherys}} I'm glad you agree with the removal of the map! And I can support that I have never heard the term Franco-Canadian before. In fact, when I google it, it refers me to Franco-Canadian affairs (the international relationship between Canada and France). Maybe the person who contested could provide a source as to why they think this is a real term? Just because [[English Canadian|Anglo-Canadian]] is a thing, doesn't mean Franco-Canadian is. [[User:Safyrr|Safyrr]] ([[User talk:Safyrr|talk]]) 13:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Recently, someone moved this article form French-Canadian to French Canadian. This action resurrected the semantic problem that we need to fix with regards to Francophone Canadians. Here is what we need to distinguish:


::: Yes, I believe that it is by analogy to the Anglo-Canadian term that some people support the presence of the Franco-Canadian term, whereas it is not really said neither in French nor in English. --[[User:Æpherys|Æpherys]] ([[User talk:Æpherys|talk]]) 14:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
'''Francophone Canadians''': Canadian citizens who speak French. This denomination includes French Canadians (2), Acadians, Metis, or immigrants from any part of the world. This definition excludes all people who are not Canadian citizens. In French, this would be ''Canadiens francophone''.


:Just seeing this talk.....what image could we use keeping in mind [[MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES]]? On side note about guesswork.....we have academic studies of just what is being dismissed [https://www.trentu.ca/futurestudents/specialization/quebec-franco-canadian-studies?target=undergraduate Quebec & Franco-Canadian Studies].<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 03:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
'''French Canadians''' (1): Canadian citizens who have some French ancestry. This denomination can include actual French (from France), French Canadians (2), Acadians, Metis, Cajuns etc. This denomination excludes Canadian citizens who may be Francophone, but are not of French descent. It is somewhat equivalent to "[[Franco American]]s which include Americans of French, French Canadian, Acadian (and others) descent. In French, this would be ''Franco-Canadien'' or ''Canadiens d'ascendance française''.


::The terrible map in question is actually not the one currently in use. [[User:Safyrr|Safyrr]] and I worked out the former map's problems back in September, and we were both satisfied with the current version. It wasn't actually removed from the article in the recent edits, it was just moved to a different section (it's in the article twice at the time I'm writing this). I think sticking with the map as per [[MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES]] seems fine. [[User:Thiqq|Thiqq]] ([[User talk:Thiqq|talk]]) 03:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
'''French Canadians''' (2): People who are French Canadian by birth or adoption. This denomination includes individuals of French Canadian descent (on either side of their famility tree), or Acadians, Irish, Scots, English etc. who were brought up as French Canadians or accepted as such by their community. Such communities existed in French Canada (Quebec) and then from there some migrated to all parts of North America. This denomination excludes French, Acadians, Cajuns, Metis etc. and other distinct Francophone cultural groups. In French, this would be ''Canadiens'' from the time of New France up to the Union Act, then later on ''Canadiens francais'' when the ''Canadiens'' became a minority ethnic group inside a federal Canada with different borders. After the 1960s, the ''Canadiens francais'' of the province of Quebec started to refer to themselves as ''Québécois'' (citizens of Quebec).


:::We didn't, he just reverted every message I sent him. You can check his talk page history to see.[[User:Safyrr|Safyrr]] ([[User talk:Safyrr|talk]]) 15:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Considering the current contents of this article, I think we should move this article from the ambiguous [[French Canadian]] to [[Francophone Canadian]] or create an disambiguation page with French Canadian. What do you all think? -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 00:41, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)


:{{tq|[…] usually considered incorrect to speak of the French Canadian people […] it is not really said neither in French nor in English|q=yes}}
: Last week, I added a subheading to [[Franco-ontarian]] in order to clarify almost exactly this kind of issue. I think, realistically, there does need to be something at the title ''French Canadian'', since it's unquestionably a common historical term and one that still gets used by many today (even if it shouldn't be). I think it's probably possible to resolve the issue by adding something similar to what I wrote up at ''franco-ontarian'' (under the heading ''Franco-ontarian identity''). [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 17:09, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
:That’s… not really what the [[OQLF]] [https://vitrinelinguistique.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/21361/la-typographie/majuscules/emploi-de-la-majuscule-pour-des-types-de-denominations/majuscule-aux-noms-de-peuples-et-dhabitants says]: “{{lang|fr|Le nom Canadien français et l’adjectif canadien-français tendent à sortir de l’usage. Le nom Canadien français peut être remplacé par Franco-Canadien}}”, neither does the [[TERMIUM Plus|Translation Bureau]]: [https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2alpha/alpha-eng.html?lang=eng&i=1&srchtxt=Franco-Canadian&codom2nd_wet=1#resultrecs] or the French dictionaries [https://usito.usherbrooke.ca/définitions/franco-canadien Usito], [https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/franco-canadien/35054 Larousse] or [https://grandrobert.lerobert.com Le Grand Robert] {{closed access}} (quote from Le Grand Robert: “{{lang|fr|franco-canadien, ienne : ◆ N. Canadien(ne) francophone. Les Franco-Canadiens de la Saskatchewan.}}”). [[User:Thibaut120094|Thibaut]] ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|talk]]) 21:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


== Merging [[Francophone Canadians]] ==
:: Thank you for responding. Does that mean you favour a disambiguation page? Because I can't imagine including a disambiguation paragraph into each article dealing with the broad subject of French Canada. It would, in the long run, lead to a lot of duplications. I think a disambiguation notice at the top of the current French Canadian article would be appropriate. The disambiguation page already sort of exists in [[French Canada]].
The article at [[Francophone Canadians]] seems to [[WP:CFORK]] a lot of content from here. It also seems to imply a definition of a "Francophone Canadian" (ie. a French Canadian not of French ethnicity) which is dubious and not clearly supported by secondary sources. I'd argue that Francophone Canadians are French Canadians, and that this content split is unnecessary at best and [[WP:OR]] at worst. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 00:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


:That's not true at all. There ''are'' ethnic French Canadians who are not francophone, and there ''are'' francophone Canadians who are not ethnically French (e.g. Vietnamese, Maghrebi, Haitian, etc.) — so while "French Canadians" and "francophone Canadians" obviously have a high degree of overlap, they are not identical sets by any stretch of the imagination. [[Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac]] and [[Emmanuel Dubourg]] and [[Maria Mourani]], for instance, are all francophone by language but not French-Canadian by ethnicity, and they're not the only people (or even the only ''notable'' people) like that. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
::Personnally, I think it is essential that this encyclopedia informs its readers of the distinction between "Canadian citizens of French descent" which lumps everyone into one meaningless ensemble and "Canadian citizens of French Canadian descent" which specifically refers to a national group that is distinct from the French, the Acadians and the others francophones. I mean, if people don't even know that Quebecers are to the French as the Americans are to the English, how could they possibly understand anything about our culture? -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 21:04, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)


== "Undercounts" ==
:: Another good reason to solve this issue: [[Franco Americans]]. Where do they fit in this? They are certainly French Canadians (2) but not French Canadians (1). Considering that there are many more people of French Canadian (2) heritage in the United States than in Canada outisde Quebec, there is no way we can avoid the subject in the long run. -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 15:49, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've removed the text alleging undercounts of the French Canadian population that were included in the article. There is no mention of "undercount" in the articles that are cited [https://web.archive.org/web/20111002032711/http://www.acs-aec.ca/pdf/polls/12154527016855.pdf] [https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CH36-4-1-2004E.pdf]. Please see [[WP:PROVEIT]]. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 21:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


:See page two of this document and the related quote; '''Virtually all persons who reported “Canadian” in 1996 had English or French as a mother tongue, were born in Canada and had both parents born inside Canada. This suggests that many of these respondents were people whose families have been in this country for several generations. In effect the “new Canadians” were persons that previously reported either British or French origins. Moreover in 1996 some 55% of people with both parents born in Canada reported Canadian (alone or in combination with other origins). By contrast, only 4% of people with both parents born outside Canada reported Canadian. Thus the Canadian response did not appeal widely to either immigrants or their children. Most important however was the fact that neatly half of those persons reporting Canadian origin in 1996 were in Quebec this represented a majority of the mother tongue francophone population."''
== ACADIA ==
Although the history of Acadia, noted in the separate discussion of Acadia in another article, is valid, one CANNOT seriously list present-day French-Canadian groups without some reference to Acadia and Acadians. The article on French-Canadians has a glaring hole in it and is of little use to people using this document to learn about Canada and its french-speaking population. It should be fixed by someone more knowledgeable than I. User: 234561


:https://web.archive.org/web/20111002032711/http://www.acs-aec.ca/pdf/polls/12154527016855.pdf
: I understand. The confusion around the term "French Canadian" is a big problem. Historically, Acadians are NOT French Canadians, for the simple reason that the French colony of Canada and the French colony of Acadia were separate colonies. The people of French Canada (today Quebecers) and the people of Acadia are quite isolated from each other geographically speaking. What is today called Canada just happens to include both the historical homeland of the ''Canadiens'' (French Canadians) and the ''Acadiens'' (Acadians). The result is that there are two different French language nationalities in present day Canada. See the semantic problem I discussed just above (under '''Semantics'''). -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 21:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)


:This is data taken from the 1996 census and is clearly indicating that the self-identified French-Canadian population is an undercount, owing to multi-generational individuals solely selecting "Canadien" as an ethnic origin on the census. As such, I have changed the note once again. [[User:Van00220|Van00220]] ([[User talk:Van00220|talk]]) 22:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
==Hyphenation==


::I've read this. This paper was not authored by Statistics Canada, but rather by Jack Jedwab of the [[Association for Canadian Studies]]. To state that the French Canadian population was "undercounted" based on his inferences is misleading, ''especially'' if that statement is placed right next to a graph of Statistics Canada census data. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 01:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I disagree that "French-Canadian" should not be hyphenated. I am in the middle of editing this article and am finding that we are hyphenating the provincial groups (Franco-Manitoban) but not the umbrella group, which is grammatically inconsistent. In addition, I am French-Canadian and have always seen and used the term primarily with a hyphen, just as one would write Italian-Canadian or African-American. I propose the page be moved back. Was there a prior discussion about this before it happened? [[User:Mona-Lynn|Mona-Lynn]] 21:12, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


:::The census data is evidence enough that the paper inference is correct; see the massive population decline between the 1991 and 1996 census, coinciding with the addition of the creation of the "Canadian" or "Canadien" ethnic origin. [[User:Van00220|Van00220]] ([[User talk:Van00220|talk]]) 05:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
:These expressions fall into two different groups. (1) Terms that start with combining forms, like ''Anglo-'', ''Franco-'', ''Russo-'', ''Sino-'', and so on. These are always hyphenated. (2) Terms containing two national adjectives, like ''French Canadian'', ''Italian Canadian'', and so on. These take a hyphen when they are adjectives: "French-Canadian town", "Italian-Canadian newspaper", "Irish-Canadian woman", "Mona-Lynn is French-Canadian"; but not when they are nouns: "He is a French Canadian", "Italian Canadians have been around for generations". It's a bit tricky till you get used to it. The Wikipedia naming convention is to have titles in noun form, with adjective forms as redirects, so that's why the article is "French Canadian" and "French-Canadian" is a redirect. [[User:Indefatigable|Indefatigable]] 21:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::So do we need to remove the hyphens from Franco-Manitoban, Franco-Albertan, etc. when being used as nouns? [[User:Mona-Lynn|Mona-Lynn]] 00:07, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:No, those belong to group (1) above, and they always have hyphens. Those combining forms that end in with an ''o'' never stand alone. They have to be joined to the word they modify with a hyphen, whether they are adjectives or nouns. Isn't English grammar grand? [[User:Indefatigable|Indefatigable]] 01:17, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== First Europeans to colonize Canada? ==

Is that true? What about Newfoundland? The [[St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador]] article claims that it was founded in 1497, although I'm not certain that is accurate.

[[User:Funnyhat|Funnyhat]] 06:44, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*Newfoundland was discovered in 1497, but the first permanent settlement wasn't founded until 1610. Quebec was first settled in 1608.Since Newfoundland was discovered first, and Quebec settled first, they both get bragging rights. [[User:Vary|Vary]] 04:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

: Actually, the problem is with the definition of Canada. Newfoundland was a separate colony of Great Britain until 1949 when it was annexed to what is today called Canada. This means that, for a very long time, Newfoundland could not have been where the first settlement of "Canada" occured.

: Worst than that, Canada currently refers to a federation in which what used to be French Canada is now a province called Quebec. For a great many Quebecers, the current Canada is a distinct political and geographical entity from the historical Canada (a colony of New France, itself a province of the Kingdom of France) which was founded by their ancestors who used to called themselves "Canadiens" long before their country was annexed to the British Empire. It is not uncommon in Quebec to say that in reality Champlain founded what is now Quebec, since Canada is today a word that conveys a different meaning than 242 years ago. So were the French first Europeans to colonize Canada? Well, it depends on which Canada you are refering to. Did you mean "le Canada" founded by Champlain, renamed the province of Quebec in 1763 or the younger Dominion of Canada, founded by John A. MacDonald and friends in 1867? -- [[User:Mathieugp|Mathieugp]] 20:30, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

== Removed Quebec nationalist bias ==

I removed parts prescribing how to refer to French Canadians. I think each person can speak for themselves on the issue of identity, including Céline Dion. I know Quebec nationalists might dearly love to get rid of the word, but that does not apply to everyone. I somehow doubt that Americans in Montana will ever adopt "franco-saskaskois" to refer to their French-speaking neighbours.

: It's not a Quebec nationalist bias. Celine Dion ''does'' identify as [[Québécoise]] rather than French Canadian. [[Franco-Ontarian]]s ''do'' identify as Franco-Ontarian rather than French Canadian. And on and so forth. The section was added by me (and for what it's worth, I've never lived in Quebec in my life, so I can hardly be accused of harbouring some Quebec nationalist bias) to clarify an objective reality. It's a ''fact'' that most French Canadians identify with their provincial subgrouping, and it's a ''fact'' that Wikipedia has to respect the right of people to self-identify rather than simply imposing a label that a group doesn't use for themselves, even if that's the more common term among outsiders. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 20:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I've never heard of a francophone outside Quebec or Ontario object to the term "French Canadian" or "Canadien-français", nor have I heard Celine Dion object to the word. I do remember her going ballistic when she won an award for "best anglophone recording artist" at ADISQ a few years back and claiming that she was not "anglophone" but "Québécoise", an indication that anglophones as a whole are not considered "Québécoise" outside the politically correct circles of Quebec intellectuals.

In any case, French Canadians outside still strongly identify as French Canadian. This is very clear when they name their national pan-Canadian and provincial cultural organizations. All you need to do is google "Canadienne-française" and you will get 269 000 hits leading to these organizations. Among hundreds of others, these include:

- Fédération culturelle canadienne-française (Cultural organization)
http://francoculture.ca/fccf/

- Association canadienne-française pour l'avancement des sciences (Science Organization)
www.acfas.ca/

- Fédération de la jeunesse canadienne-française (Youth organization)
http://www.fjcf.ca/

- Alberta (Association Canadienne Française de l'Alberta (ACFA))
http://www.acfa.ab.ca/default.asp

- Ontario (Association canadienne-française de l'Ontario (ACFO))
http://www.acfo.ca/

- Regina (L’Association canadienne-française de Regina (ACFR))
http://www.scfpa.ca/
So your whole point about French Canadians outside Quebec no longer self-identifying as French Canadian is completely unsubstantiated. At best, it is annecdotal. It is clear that "franco-ontarian" is used interchangeably with "French Canadian from Ontario". It is not offensive to anyone.

- the following peer-reviewed article,it's clear that outside Quebec, they continue to speak of their French-Canadian identity, particularly in literature:

http://www.utpjournals.com/jour.ihtml?lp=product/utq/634/634_hayne.htm


The article also reviews the nationalist political context behind eliminating the word in Quebec.

So until you come up with some of examples of organizations outside Quebec that have specifically negated the use of "french Canadian" or "Candien-français", I think your point on modern usage is just plain wrong. Every Francophone organization outside Quebec refers to itself as French Canadian in some context, and French Canadians outside Quebec, be they from Ontario or Saskatchewan, have no problem with it. There may be a few Quebec nationalists living there that disagree, but they are about as marginal as Alberta seperatists.

As for the point that the Quebecois no longer identify as French Canadian, that point is made clear earlier in the article. You do not long, belaboured personal annecdotes to make this point. I think the whole section on "modern usage" should be removed pending revisions of the factual errors.

And to clarify, I am not vandalizing the site and making arbitrary changes. I'm removing content that cannot be substantiated beyond anecdotal evidence. I've added links to Pan-Canadian "Canadien-français" organizations that clearly identify as just that, and made reference to several provicnicial and local organizationes as well. I apologize if I have violated any wiki protocols.

: Franco-Ontarians, for example, identify strongly as Franco-Ontarian. They retain the Franco-Ontarian identity even if they move to another province. They do ''not'' identify as "French Canadian" — in fact, the official name of [[ACFO]] was changed within the past few years from "Association canadienne-française de l'Ontario" to "Association des communautés franco-ontariennes", precisely ''because'' "canadienne-française" is problematic and ''not'' representative of how the community identifies. The article also needs to make clear that a Franco-Ontarian who moves to Quebec does not magically become Québécois; the identities are not interchangeable. And, for the record, your evidence is not supporting your claim — every one of the examples you posted is a national group which is using "French Canadian" as a collective term for ''all'' francophone groups in Canada, which is ''precisely'' one of the contexts where the section you're disputing says the term ''is'' still perfectly valid and correct. You have not provided ''any'' proof that groups exclusive to Saskatchewan would identify themselves as "French Canadian" rather than [[Fransaskois]]; you've provided evidence that "French Canadian" is used as a ''collective'' term when something applies equally to Saskatchewan ''and'' Ontario ''and'' Quebec. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 08:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

:: Well, Newfoundlanders maintain their Newfoundland identity when they move to Toronto or Calgary, and Montrealers maintain their Montreal affection for bagels and the Canadiens when they move to Toronto, so why is it worth mentioning that Saskatchewan francophones maintain a soft spot for Saskatchewan when they leave? And none of that prevents them from identifying as Canadians. And in Quebec they make a huge fuss about making sure that Algerians and Haitians are "Quebecois", that it's just silly to consider that francophones moving from Saskatchewan aren't considered "Quebecois". The whole subject is silly and not worth mentioning in an encyclopedia.

As for what is "politically correct", that has no place in an encyclopedia. The encyclopedia is here to describe words and ideas as they are used, not how you would like them to be.

Moreover, I still haven't come across any Franco-Ontarian or Fransaskois having a problem with "French Canadian". I know lots that would have a problem with "Quebecois" if they are not living there, but that's because they are not. You are going to have to provide proof that individuals identify more with their provincial identity than with their national one. You will have to go one step further and show examples where someone has taken offense at being called "French Canadian". That is obvious in Quebec, but not elsewhere in Canada.

Latest revision as of 13:19, 14 February 2024


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Map is terrible and needs to be replaced

[edit]

The map given as an image in the navbox is terrible, inaccurate and misleads the readers (WP:Inaccuracy). Here are a few reasons why:

  1. The map's percentages only go up to 10%. This heavily misleads the reader by not showing that this ethnicity makes up the majority of Quebec's population.
  2. It uses the US and Canadian census as a source of information. However, the US census does not allow and has never allowed "French Canadian" to be picked as an ethnic group. This map is showing people who selected "French" descent, but presents it as though they selected "French Canadian". These ethnicities, though related, are different. This map is misleading the reader into believing that the US census gives "French Canadian" as an option, and that there are more people of this ethnicity there than there actually are. Though the image's description says this, most people will not read it.
  3. The map shows results from Canada and the US only, leaving out other areas where French Canadians can be found.
  4. It uses the US and Canadian census as a source of information. However, it is the 1990 US census and the 2016 Canadian census. These dates are very far apart. As the proportion of people with French Canadian ancestry is declining in both Canada and the US due to massive immigration, these mismatched dates are misleading because they lead the reader to believe that there are more people of this ethnicity in the US than there actually are.
  5. This map, on top of confusing people of "French-Canadian" and "French" descent together, does not make it clear if the Canadian data is only showing those of "French Canadian" and/or "French" ethnicity, or if groups such as Acadians and "Quebecois" are included as well.

In short, this map has too many problems and misleads the reader too much to be acceptable. As stated on WP:Editing policy: "on Wikipedia a lack of information is better than misleading or false information". It should either be removed entirely, replaced with a better map, or replaced with an alternative image.

Safyrr (talk) 06:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour-hi @Safyrr: ! Points 2, 3 and 5 do not seem very important to me. It is already specified on the map that for the United States, it was respectively the "French americans" and for Canada the "French Canadians" (even if one may wonder what the French americans are doing on an article talking about French Canadians ... Afterwards, as the majority of French Americans have Canadian ancestry (of Québec, Acadie), this is not completely insane). I am for the removal of the card. There are too many problems, especially points 1 and 4 that you mention. In itself, it's not that disturbing the date so far between the two. However, it must absolutely be specified in the legend. As for point one, in fact, we cannot accept this map, which pretends that Québec is a bit of a territory like any other for French Canadians. Other subject… I removed the term "Franco-Canadien" which is really used very very marginally in French (and is usually considered incorrect to speak of the French Canadian people), and I suffered the contestation of someone opposed to it. What do you think ? Apparently, even in English, it doesn't really say ("Franco-canadians" 15,000 results, "French canadians" 872,000 results ....).--Æpherys (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Æpherys: I'm glad you agree with the removal of the map! And I can support that I have never heard the term Franco-Canadian before. In fact, when I google it, it refers me to Franco-Canadian affairs (the international relationship between Canada and France). Maybe the person who contested could provide a source as to why they think this is a real term? Just because Anglo-Canadian is a thing, doesn't mean Franco-Canadian is. Safyrr (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe that it is by analogy to the Anglo-Canadian term that some people support the presence of the Franco-Canadian term, whereas it is not really said neither in French nor in English. --Æpherys (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just seeing this talk.....what image could we use keeping in mind MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES? On side note about guesswork.....we have academic studies of just what is being dismissed Quebec & Franco-Canadian Studies.Moxy- 03:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The terrible map in question is actually not the one currently in use. Safyrr and I worked out the former map's problems back in September, and we were both satisfied with the current version. It wasn't actually removed from the article in the recent edits, it was just moved to a different section (it's in the article twice at the time I'm writing this). I think sticking with the map as per MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES seems fine. Thiqq (talk) 03:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We didn't, he just reverted every message I sent him. You can check his talk page history to see.Safyrr (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[…] usually considered incorrect to speak of the French Canadian people […] it is not really said neither in French nor in English
That’s… not really what the OQLF says: “Le nom Canadien français et l’adjectif canadien-français tendent à sortir de l’usage. Le nom Canadien français peut être remplacé par Franco-Canadien”, neither does the Translation Bureau: [1] or the French dictionaries Usito, Larousse or Le Grand Robert Closed access icon (quote from Le Grand Robert: “franco-canadien, ienne : ◆ N. Canadien(ne) francophone. Les Franco-Canadiens de la Saskatchewan.”). Thibaut (talk) 21:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Francophone Canadians

[edit]

The article at Francophone Canadians seems to WP:CFORK a lot of content from here. It also seems to imply a definition of a "Francophone Canadian" (ie. a French Canadian not of French ethnicity) which is dubious and not clearly supported by secondary sources. I'd argue that Francophone Canadians are French Canadians, and that this content split is unnecessary at best and WP:OR at worst. 162 etc. (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true at all. There are ethnic French Canadians who are not francophone, and there are francophone Canadians who are not ethnically French (e.g. Vietnamese, Maghrebi, Haitian, etc.) — so while "French Canadians" and "francophone Canadians" obviously have a high degree of overlap, they are not identical sets by any stretch of the imagination. Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac and Emmanuel Dubourg and Maria Mourani, for instance, are all francophone by language but not French-Canadian by ethnicity, and they're not the only people (or even the only notable people) like that. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Undercounts"

[edit]

I've removed the text alleging undercounts of the French Canadian population that were included in the article. There is no mention of "undercount" in the articles that are cited [2] [3]. Please see WP:PROVEIT. 162 etc. (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See page two of this document and the related quote; 'Virtually all persons who reported “Canadian” in 1996 had English or French as a mother tongue, were born in Canada and had both parents born inside Canada. This suggests that many of these respondents were people whose families have been in this country for several generations. In effect the “new Canadians” were persons that previously reported either British or French origins. Moreover in 1996 some 55% of people with both parents born in Canada reported Canadian (alone or in combination with other origins). By contrast, only 4% of people with both parents born outside Canada reported Canadian. Thus the Canadian response did not appeal widely to either immigrants or their children. Most important however was the fact that neatly half of those persons reporting Canadian origin in 1996 were in Quebec this represented a majority of the mother tongue francophone population."
https://web.archive.org/web/20111002032711/http://www.acs-aec.ca/pdf/polls/12154527016855.pdf
This is data taken from the 1996 census and is clearly indicating that the self-identified French-Canadian population is an undercount, owing to multi-generational individuals solely selecting "Canadien" as an ethnic origin on the census. As such, I have changed the note once again. Van00220 (talk) 22:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've read this. This paper was not authored by Statistics Canada, but rather by Jack Jedwab of the Association for Canadian Studies. To state that the French Canadian population was "undercounted" based on his inferences is misleading, especially if that statement is placed right next to a graph of Statistics Canada census data. 162 etc. (talk) 01:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The census data is evidence enough that the paper inference is correct; see the massive population decline between the 1991 and 1996 census, coinciding with the addition of the creation of the "Canadian" or "Canadien" ethnic origin. Van00220 (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:French_Canadians&oldid=1207300755"