Jump to content

Talk:PetSmart: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
controversy section?
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Dogs|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|AZ=Yes|AZ-importance=Low}}
}}
{{Annual readership}}


== [[PetSmart Charities]] ==
Pet Smart, not Pet's Mart. Right?
::Yeah, just look at the logo. [[User:Rzrscm|Rzrscm]] 19:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


Although it seems from the banners that this page has some problems of its own, I wanted to point out that there's an ongoing [[WP:AFD|deletion discussion]] for the article [[PetSmart Charities]] over at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetSmart Charities]]. Help improving that article would be welcome as would any opinion on whether [[PetSmart Charities]] should have its own article or whether, as one editor has suggested, the references and details there should be folded back into this article where the subject is also discussed at some length already. Thanks! —<b>[[User:Benjamin Mako Hill|<span style="color:#C40099;">m</span><span style="color:#600099;">a</span><span style="color:#2D0399;">k</span><span style="color:#362365;">o</span>]][[User_talk:Benjamin Mako Hill|<span style="color:#000000;">๛</span>]]</b> 18:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
== PetSmart ==

The PetSmart logo as we see it today (PetSmart vs. PETsMART) was brought about in Fall (I believe September) 2005, not 2006 as this article states <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/68.225.217.226|68.225.217.226]] ([[User talk:68.225.217.226|talk]]) 18:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

But the PETSMART logo has an " ' " behind the "pet" making it pet's mart
:No, that is to separate the words "Pet" and "Smart". Notice how one word is red and other is blue. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Steven Evens|Steven Evens]] ([[User talk:Steven Evens|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Steven Evens|contribs]]) 00:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Peta?==
Does the link to the PETA article qualify as a [[WP:RS|reliable source?]] It is very strongly biased against the organization, but contains only a little actual verifiable information. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 22:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
:It's a bit odd that the section is called "Allegations by PETA". I think it's OK to have some of the information in the article but maybe under a Controversy section - that's the way the PETA stuff is handled on the [[KFC]] page. I just did a quick web search on Petsmart and PETA didn't show up, but some rabbit organization did with similar complaints, so controversy should probably be mentioned but with less emphasis on PETA and more on referenced material.[[User:Bob98133|Bob98133]] ([[User talk:Bob98133|talk]]) 22:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:33, 14 February 2024


Although it seems from the banners that this page has some problems of its own, I wanted to point out that there's an ongoing deletion discussion for the article PetSmart Charities over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetSmart Charities. Help improving that article would be welcome as would any opinion on whether PetSmart Charities should have its own article or whether, as one editor has suggested, the references and details there should be folded back into this article where the subject is also discussed at some length already. Thanks! —mako 18:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]