Jump to content

Talk:History of American comics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Comics}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject History}}.
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WPBS|1=
{{WikiProject Comics|class=start|importance=high|us=y}}
{{WikiProject Comics|importance=high|us=y}}
{{WikiProject United States|UScomics=yes|UScomics-importance=|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=high|UScomics=yes|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject History}}
{{WikiProject History|importance=high}}
}}
}}


==Fringe theories==
==Fringe theories==
One editor had taken it upon himself/herself to present [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theories]] espoused by a couple of mostly amateur, fan historians. Things like the so-called Copper Age and Atom Age are not used in mainstream comics scholarship, and to present them as established terms is completely misleading. These are fringe notions, and if they're included at all, it needs to be in a section specifically framing them as fringe. And we certainly can't give them the wildly [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] they were given. --[[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5|2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5|talk]]) 05:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
One editor had taken it upon himself/herself to present [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theories]] espoused by a couple of mostly amateur, fan historians. Things like the so-called Copper Age and Atom Age are not used in mainstream comics scholarship, and to present them as established terms is completely misleading. These are fringe notions, and if they're included at all, it needs to be in a section specifically framing them as fringe. And we certainly can't give them the wildly [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] they were given. --[[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5|2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5|talk]]) 05:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
:I have to contest the claim that [[Shirrel Rhoades]] citing [[Steve Geppi]] (Rhoades 2008, p. 71) is a non-notable inclusion in a paragraph containing alternative periodization schemes. As for the Atom Age, it appears in William W. Savage, ''Commies, Cowboys, and Jungle Queens: Comic Books and America, 1945–1954'', Wesleyan University Press, 1998, p. 111. --[[User:Omnipaedista|Omnipaedista]] ([[User talk:Omnipaedista|talk]]) 16:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:14, 15 February 2024

Fringe theories

[edit]

One editor had taken it upon himself/herself to present fringe theories espoused by a couple of mostly amateur, fan historians. Things like the so-called Copper Age and Atom Age are not used in mainstream comics scholarship, and to present them as established terms is completely misleading. These are fringe notions, and if they're included at all, it needs to be in a section specifically framing them as fringe. And we certainly can't give them the wildly undue weight they were given. --2604:2000:1382:C5DD:C101:1C49:1BAD:27F5 (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have to contest the claim that Shirrel Rhoades citing Steve Geppi (Rhoades 2008, p. 71) is a non-notable inclusion in a paragraph containing alternative periodization schemes. As for the Atom Age, it appears in William W. Savage, Commies, Cowboys, and Jungle Queens: Comic Books and America, 1945–1954, Wesleyan University Press, 1998, p. 111. --Omnipaedista (talk) 16:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]