Jump to content

Talk:Heinkel He 59: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m typo
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPAVIATION}}.
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=Stub|importance=|Aviation=y|German=y|Weaponry=yes|WWII=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WPAVIATION|Aircraft-project=yes|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Aviation|Aircraft-project=yes| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> =n
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =n
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> =n
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y
}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=start|B1=n|B2=n|B3=y|B4=n|B5=y|Aviation=y|German=y|WWII=y|Maritime=y}}
}}

== External links ==

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RPGhVujhfU 1939 Film of an He 59
The Encyclopaedia of Weapons of World War II by Chris Bishop http://books.google.com.au/books?id=MuGsf0psjvcC&pg=PA377&lpg=PA377&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=K5YxvfSAeJ&sig=nfGBJ_x73WIz0UAWWEiY29ukDLw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5XAhUeuCOuOHmQXMnIBI&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Includes a full colour picture. Armament included one torpedo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RPGhVujhfU 1939 Film of an He 59
http://www.youtube.com/v/8YYjw0QK0wE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&autoplay=1 Better views of one shot down in 1940
The Encyclopaedia of Weapons of World War II by Chris Bishop Page 376 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=MuGsf0psjvcC&pg=PA377&lpg=PA377&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=K5YxvfSAeJ&sig=nfGBJ_x73WIz0UAWWEiY29ukDLw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5XAhUeuCOuOHmQXMnIBI&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Includes a full colour picture. Armament included one torpedo.

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_heinkel_he_59.html He 59E-1
“The E-1 was a torpedo bomber trainer similar to the D-1” Bomb-load included one torpedo
http://www.9thflottilla.de/9he59.htm “The twin engine double-winged He 59 was constructed during the time of secret military planing in 1930. It was designed as a torpedo-bomber with changeable wheel- or skid landing-gears”
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=hdQBTcscxyQC&pg=PA321&lpg=PA321&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=7QPxP2smFF&sig=xWw2Z2QVBfVuGX-9HxksblHfFbk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=w3YhUfrZPMHxmAWttIGICA&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Aircraft of the Luftwaffe, 1935-1945: An Illustrated Guide By Jean-Denis Lepage, p 323: It was used… as a torpedo carrier,… anti-shipping craft
http://battleofbritain.devhub.com/blog/590743-a-controversial-victory/ it was used as a torpedo bomber
http://nelliebswartimerationing.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/wwii-aircraft-of-day-heinkel-he-59.html The pilots soon discovered that the Heinkel He 59 made an ideal night bomber and could glide silently towards the enemy
[[User:Sitalkes|Sitalkes]] ([[User talk:Sitalkes|talk]]) 00:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

===Problem===
Just about everything in the section about the British shooting down sea rescue planes is repeated exactly on the page about the [[Dornier Do 24]], right down to the the supposed incident where the British shot down the first plane claiming it was spying on a convoy. On that page they claim this happened to a Do 24. Both pages appear to make their respective aircraft the sole or primary operator in sea-air rescue in 1940, and both appear to describe the same series of events, or one very similar. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.223.160.96|64.223.160.96]] ([[User talk:64.223.160.96#top|talk]]) 22:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:The [[Dornier Do 24]] page doesn't mention this incident at all - so I'm not sure the point you are trying to make.[[User:Nigel Ish|Nigel Ish]] ([[User talk:Nigel Ish|talk]]) 22:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
::My mistake. I was using a mobile and I must have mistakenly thought I read that on the Do 24 page. Not sure how I did that. I must have gotten onto the Sienotdiesnt page without noticing and thought I was still reading the Do 24 page. Sorry.

[[Special:Contributions/71.169.170.95|71.169.170.95]] ([[User talk:71.169.170.95|talk]]) 07:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
:::However, that does point to a legitimate problem. The material on [[Seenotdienst]] is properly sourced, but this page cites the "''Brandenburg Historica''" blog, which appears to be largely lifted (without citation) from [[Seenotdienst]]. Either this material should be deduplicated, or this page should copy the proper citations from the other one. [[User:Phase Theory|P]][[User talk:Phase Theory|T]] 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:04, 15 February 2024

[edit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RPGhVujhfU 1939 Film of an He 59 The Encyclopaedia of Weapons of World War II by Chris Bishop http://books.google.com.au/books?id=MuGsf0psjvcC&pg=PA377&lpg=PA377&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=K5YxvfSAeJ&sig=nfGBJ_x73WIz0UAWWEiY29ukDLw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5XAhUeuCOuOHmQXMnIBI&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Includes a full colour picture. Armament included one torpedo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RPGhVujhfU 1939 Film of an He 59 http://www.youtube.com/v/8YYjw0QK0wE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&autoplay=1 Better views of one shot down in 1940 The Encyclopaedia of Weapons of World War II by Chris Bishop Page 376 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=MuGsf0psjvcC&pg=PA377&lpg=PA377&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=K5YxvfSAeJ&sig=nfGBJ_x73WIz0UAWWEiY29ukDLw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5XAhUeuCOuOHmQXMnIBI&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Includes a full colour picture. Armament included one torpedo.

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_heinkel_he_59.html He 59E-1 “The E-1 was a torpedo bomber trainer similar to the D-1” Bomb-load included one torpedo http://www.9thflottilla.de/9he59.htm “The twin engine double-winged He 59 was constructed during the time of secret military planing in 1930. It was designed as a torpedo-bomber with changeable wheel- or skid landing-gears” http://books.google.com.au/books?id=hdQBTcscxyQC&pg=PA321&lpg=PA321&dq=he+59&source=bl&ots=7QPxP2smFF&sig=xWw2Z2QVBfVuGX-9HxksblHfFbk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=w3YhUfrZPMHxmAWttIGICA&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=he%2059&f=false Aircraft of the Luftwaffe, 1935-1945: An Illustrated Guide By Jean-Denis Lepage, p 323: It was used… as a torpedo carrier,… anti-shipping craft http://battleofbritain.devhub.com/blog/590743-a-controversial-victory/ it was used as a torpedo bomber http://nelliebswartimerationing.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/wwii-aircraft-of-day-heinkel-he-59.html The pilots soon discovered that the Heinkel He 59 made an ideal night bomber and could glide silently towards the enemy Sitalkes (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problem

[edit]

Just about everything in the section about the British shooting down sea rescue planes is repeated exactly on the page about the Dornier Do 24, right down to the the supposed incident where the British shot down the first plane claiming it was spying on a convoy. On that page they claim this happened to a Do 24. Both pages appear to make their respective aircraft the sole or primary operator in sea-air rescue in 1940, and both appear to describe the same series of events, or one very similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.223.160.96 (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Dornier Do 24 page doesn't mention this incident at all - so I'm not sure the point you are trying to make.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. I was using a mobile and I must have mistakenly thought I read that on the Do 24 page. Not sure how I did that. I must have gotten onto the Sienotdiesnt page without noticing and thought I was still reading the Do 24 page. Sorry.

71.169.170.95 (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

However, that does point to a legitimate problem. The material on Seenotdienst is properly sourced, but this page cites the "Brandenburg Historica" blog, which appears to be largely lifted (without citation) from Seenotdienst. Either this material should be deduplicated, or this page should copy the proper citations from the other one. PT 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]