Jump to content

Talk:Iowa Interstate Railroad: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m class=start
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Illinois}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Trains}}.
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TrainsWikiProject|class=start}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|NE=Yes|NE-importance=Mid|IA=yes|IA-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Trains|importance=mid|refimprove=yes|mapneeded=yes}}
}}
{{todo, trains}}
{{todo, trains}}
{{dyktalk|25 May|2005|entry=...that the '''[[Iowa Interstate Railroad]]''' is being considered for [[high speed train|high speed]] [[passenger train]] service between [[Wyanet, Illinois]], and [[Iowa City, Iowa|Iowa City]]?}}


== High Speed ==
== High Speed ==

''Beginning in the mid [[1990s]], the IAIS mainline has been identified as a potential route for [[high speed train|high speed]] [[passenger train]] .... to allow passenger train speeds of 79 [[miles per hour|mph]] (127 [[kilometres per hour|km/h]])....''
''Beginning in the mid [[1990s]], the IAIS mainline has been identified as a potential route for [[high speed train|high speed]] [[passenger train]] .... to allow passenger train speeds of 79 [[miles per hour|mph]] (127 [[kilometres per hour|km/h]])....''


How does 79 mph count as high speed? Sounds pretty average to me. According to the link provided above, [[high speed train|high speed]] is above 125mph at least. [[User:Maccoinnich|Maccoinnich]] 12:26, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
How does 79 mph count as high speed? Sounds pretty average to me. According to the link provided above, [[high speed train|high speed]] is above 125mph at least. [[User:Maccoinnich|Maccoinnich]] 12:26, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

:79 is currently the normal speed limit for passenger trains in the US and was used as a marker to get initial estimates for the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. The eventual goal is to get passenger train speeds up to and above 110 throughout the MWRRI system. The system is a series of routes emanating from Chicago to population centers throughout the Midwest such as Minneapolis, Iowa City, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Detroit. See [http://www.dot.state.mn.us/passengerrail/onepagers/midwest.html] (Minnesota DOT), [http://www.dot.state.il.us/hsrail/highspdinfo.html] (Illinois DOT), [http://www.mdot.state.mi.us/communications/press/archive.cfm?file=08-26JF] (Michigan DOT), and others if you Google for "Midwest Regional Rail Initiative". [[User:Slambo|slambo]] 13:22, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
:79 is currently the normal speed limit for passenger trains in the US and was used as a marker to get initial estimates for the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. The eventual goal is to get passenger train speeds up to and above 110 throughout the MWRRI system. The system is a series of routes emanating from Chicago to population centers throughout the Midwest such as Minneapolis, Iowa City, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Detroit. See [http://www.dot.state.mn.us/passengerrail/onepagers/midwest.html] (Minnesota DOT), [http://www.dot.state.il.us/hsrail/highspdinfo.html] (Illinois DOT), [http://www.mdot.state.mi.us/communications/press/archive.cfm?file=08-26JF] (Michigan DOT), and others if you Google for "Midwest Regional Rail Initiative". [[User:Slambo|slambo]] 13:22, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

::Perhaps that should explained in the article then? Still, even 110mph doesn't qualify for high speed rail according to its own article. I clicked on this page as it was on the front page "Did you know?" section, and was intrigued to see that there were plans for high speed rail in the Midwest. Laudable and interesting as any improvements are, it's kind of misleading to describe it as high speed. [[User:Maccoinnich|Maccoinnich]] 18:27, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
::Perhaps that should explained in the article then? Still, even 110mph doesn't qualify for high speed rail according to its own article. I clicked on this page as it was on the front page "Did you know?" section, and was intrigued to see that there were plans for high speed rail in the Midwest. Laudable and interesting as any improvements are, it's kind of misleading to describe it as high speed. [[User:Maccoinnich|Maccoinnich]] 18:27, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

:::I've already updated the article to include this information. [[User:Slambo|slambo]] 19:09, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
:::I've already updated the article to include this information. [[User:Slambo|slambo]] 19:09, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
::: 79 is the speed limit for non-PTC lines. PTC was optional until an accident has motivated Congress to mandate it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.149.135.25|75.149.135.25]] ([[User talk:75.149.135.25|talk]]) 15:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on [[Iowa Interstate Railroad]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/810580237|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313123532/http://www.iowadot.gov/amtrakstudy/news_release3.html to http://www.iowadot.gov/amtrakstudy/news_release3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050208225324/http://www.iaisrr.com/about.htm to http://www.iaisrr.com/about.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:41, 15 February 2024

High Speed

[edit]

Beginning in the mid 1990s, the IAIS mainline has been identified as a potential route for high speed passenger train .... to allow passenger train speeds of 79 mph (127 km/h)....

How does 79 mph count as high speed? Sounds pretty average to me. According to the link provided above, high speed is above 125mph at least. Maccoinnich 12:26, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

79 is currently the normal speed limit for passenger trains in the US and was used as a marker to get initial estimates for the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. The eventual goal is to get passenger train speeds up to and above 110 throughout the MWRRI system. The system is a series of routes emanating from Chicago to population centers throughout the Midwest such as Minneapolis, Iowa City, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Detroit. See [1] (Minnesota DOT), [2] (Illinois DOT), [3] (Michigan DOT), and others if you Google for "Midwest Regional Rail Initiative". slambo 13:22, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps that should explained in the article then? Still, even 110mph doesn't qualify for high speed rail according to its own article. I clicked on this page as it was on the front page "Did you know?" section, and was intrigued to see that there were plans for high speed rail in the Midwest. Laudable and interesting as any improvements are, it's kind of misleading to describe it as high speed. Maccoinnich 18:27, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
I've already updated the article to include this information. slambo 19:09, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
79 is the speed limit for non-PTC lines. PTC was optional until an accident has motivated Congress to mandate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.149.135.25 (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iowa Interstate Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]