Talk:Kirwan Health Campus: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
update WP:HOS |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Australia}}, {{WikiProject Hospitals}}. Tag: |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WPBS| |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=low |
||
|class=Start |
|||
|importance=low |
|||
<!-- Wikiproject specific tags --> |
<!-- Wikiproject specific tags --> |
||
|QLD=yes|QLD-importance=low |
|QLD=yes|QLD-importance=low |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject Hospitals |
{{WikiProject Hospitals|importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Speedy delete notice == |
== Speedy delete notice == |
||
The Kirwan Health Campus is a major piece of Government infrastructure and it is probably the second biggest facility in the Townsville Health District. Cheers, < |
The Kirwan Health Campus is a major piece of Government infrastructure and it is probably the second biggest facility in the Townsville Health District. Cheers, [[User:WikiTownsvillian |<span style="font-family:comic sans ms; color:#454545;">Wiki</span>]][[User talk:WikiTownsvillian|Townsvillia]][[Special:Contributions/WikiTownsvillian|n]] 08:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*With due respect, how major can it really be particularly when it only has self-references to the content? No notable information has been included which can be confirmed independent secondary sources, and the article has languished in this state for more months than I can remember. [[WP:ILIKEIT]] is not a good enough reason for it to be kept. Request to speedy still stands. [[User:Thewinchester|Thewinchester]] [[User_talk:Thewinchester|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
*With due respect, how major can it really be particularly when it only has self-references to the content? No notable information has been included which can be confirmed independent secondary sources, and the article has languished in this state for more months than I can remember. [[WP:ILIKEIT]] is not a good enough reason for it to be kept. Request to speedy still stands. [[User:Thewinchester|Thewinchester]] [[User_talk:Thewinchester|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*Well im so sorry i will go in tomorrow and put in other refs, i just used the one as it tells you all you need to know and i have a life, plus is this a pick on me now is it? or just Thuringowa.... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thuringowacityrep|Thuringowacityrep]] ([[User talk:Thuringowacityrep|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thuringowacityrep|contribs]]) 10:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*Well im so sorry i will go in tomorrow and put in other refs, i just used the one as it tells you all you need to know and i have a life, plus is this a pick on me now is it? or just Thuringowa.... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thuringowacityrep|Thuringowacityrep]] ([[User talk:Thuringowacityrep|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thuringowacityrep|contribs]]) 10:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::I wasn't saying that this article should stay because I like it, I was saying that it is a notable facility, the only criteria for notability is that there is enough reference material in existence to build up a featured article on it. Quite clearly there would be in this case were some editors to put a whole heap of work into it. 'I don't like it' is not a reason to mark things for speedy deletions, while I agree some of the things TCR is fighting you on might not be legit, and I also acknowledge that you are making some really positive contributions to Townsville/Thuringowa related articles, but don't loose your higher ground by picking fights with him without being able to back it up. Cheers, < |
::I wasn't saying that this article should stay because I like it, I was saying that it is a notable facility, the only criteria for notability is that there is enough reference material in existence to build up a featured article on it. Quite clearly there would be in this case were some editors to put a whole heap of work into it. 'I don't like it' is not a reason to mark things for speedy deletions, while I agree some of the things TCR is fighting you on might not be legit, and I also acknowledge that you are making some really positive contributions to Townsville/Thuringowa related articles, but don't loose your higher ground by picking fights with him without being able to back it up. Cheers, [[User:WikiTownsvillian |<span style="font-family:comic sans ms; color:#454545;">Wiki</span>]][[User talk:WikiTownsvillian|Townsvillia]][[Special:Contributions/WikiTownsvillian|n]] 11:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
::ps there are 687 results from Google for "Kirwan Health Campus", that alone should establish notability. |
::ps there are 687 results from Google for "Kirwan Health Campus", that alone should establish notability. |
Latest revision as of 06:30, 16 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Speedy delete notice
[edit]The Kirwan Health Campus is a major piece of Government infrastructure and it is probably the second biggest facility in the Townsville Health District. Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 08:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- With due respect, how major can it really be particularly when it only has self-references to the content? No notable information has been included which can be confirmed independent secondary sources, and the article has languished in this state for more months than I can remember. WP:ILIKEIT is not a good enough reason for it to be kept. Request to speedy still stands. Thewinchester (talk) 09:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well im so sorry i will go in tomorrow and put in other refs, i just used the one as it tells you all you need to know and i have a life, plus is this a pick on me now is it? or just Thuringowa.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuringowacityrep (talk • contribs) 10:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't saying that this article should stay because I like it, I was saying that it is a notable facility, the only criteria for notability is that there is enough reference material in existence to build up a featured article on it. Quite clearly there would be in this case were some editors to put a whole heap of work into it. 'I don't like it' is not a reason to mark things for speedy deletions, while I agree some of the things TCR is fighting you on might not be legit, and I also acknowledge that you are making some really positive contributions to Townsville/Thuringowa related articles, but don't loose your higher ground by picking fights with him without being able to back it up. Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 11:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- ps there are 687 results from Google for "Kirwan Health Campus", that alone should establish notability.