Jump to content

Talk:Ernest Saunders: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added wikiproject templates
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|priority=|listas=Saunders, Ernest}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=No|class=Start|blp=Yes|listas=Saunders, Ernest|
{{WikiProject Business}}
{{WikiProject Austria|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Criminal biography}}
{{WikiProject Biography|needs-photo=Yes}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}}
{{needinfobox}}
{{WikiProject England|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject University of Cambridge}}
}}

==PoV==
Reverted a major edit by Newshounder -- it was not explained. Some changes may be factual corrections but much seems to bowdlerize facts in the article to make it more favourable to the subject. Further editing may be useful if some explanation can be given for changes. --[[User:Mervyn|mervyn]] 08:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
Reverted a major edit by Newshounder -- it was not explained. Some changes may be factual corrections but much seems to bowdlerize facts in the article to make it more favourable to the subject. Further editing may be useful if some explanation can be given for changes. --[[User:Mervyn|mervyn]] 08:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)


Line 13: Line 18:


If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->

[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Line 20: Line 24:
Presumably this applies to Lord Justice Neill "A DTI report described him as a man who did "unjustifiable favours for friends and himself"."
Presumably this applies to Lord Justice Neill "A DTI report described him as a man who did "unjustifiable favours for friends and himself"."


== A Medical Miracle ==
== A medical miracle ==


This man apparently made a full recovery from an incurable condition. Why is there no fuller medical explanation?
This man apparently made a full recovery from an incurable condition. Why is there no fuller medical explanation?


The article should also make it clearer that the man is a convicted criminal (a "crook" as the Americans would say). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/109.155.145.170|109.155.145.170]] ([[User talk:109.155.145.170|talk]]) 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The article should also make it clearer that the man is a convicted criminal (a "crook" as the Americans would say). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/109.155.145.170|109.155.145.170]] ([[User talk:109.155.145.170|talk]]) 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I have heard the word "crook" used in England. I see your point, however. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.155.53.143|81.155.53.143]] ([[User talk:81.155.53.143|talk]]) 19:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::Lyons also had the same problem, bad health. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.155.53.143|81.155.53.143]] ([[User talk:81.155.53.143|talk]]) 17:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 08:15, 17 February 2024

PoV

[edit]

Reverted a major edit by Newshounder -- it was not explained. Some changes may be factual corrections but much seems to bowdlerize facts in the article to make it more favourable to the subject. Further editing may be useful if some explanation can be given for changes. --mervyn 08:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Earnestsaunders.jpg

[edit]

Image:Earnestsaunders.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who?

[edit]

Presumably this applies to Lord Justice Neill "A DTI report described him as a man who did "unjustifiable favours for friends and himself"."

A medical miracle

[edit]

This man apparently made a full recovery from an incurable condition. Why is there no fuller medical explanation?

The article should also make it clearer that the man is a convicted criminal (a "crook" as the Americans would say). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.145.170 (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard the word "crook" used in England. I see your point, however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.53.143 (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lyons also had the same problem, bad health. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.53.143 (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]