Talk:Lu Over the Wall: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:08, 18 February 2024

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Japanese / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:16, December 21, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Critical Response

User:The sleepwalker I reverted your edit deleting the review from RogerEbert.com. It seems to fit the guidelines on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Critical response. If you'd like to further discuss that, please do so here. Ehler (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The sleepwalker (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You’re also a Missouri-synod Lutheran. Well, his comment in summary says he was bored. It’s a childish exaggeration and it’s not helpful to discerning whether the movie is worth watching or not. Therefore, it doesn’t add anything to the article. The sleepwalker (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that it's criticizing several things at once; the quality of the voice acting and narrative structure, in addition to the themes. User:Blue Oceanman originally contributed the review, maybe he or she could provide some clarity as to why the source was originally chosen. There's not a lot of clear guidance from policies on what reviews to include, but I think WP:Balance might lend itself towards the merits of having a critical review. Ehler (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
-{{WikiProject Anime and manga|class=start|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Anime and manga|importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Film|class=start|Animated=yes|animated-importance=low|Japanese=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Film|Animated=yes|animated-importance=low|Japanese=yes}}
-{{WikiProject Japan|class=start|importance=low|cinema=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Japan|importance=low|cinema=yes}}
 }}
+== Critical Response ==
+[[User:The sleepwalker]] I reverted your edit deleting the review from RogerEbert.com. It seems to fit the guidelines on [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Critical response]]. If you'd like to further discuss that, please do so here. [[User:Ehler|Ehler]] ([[User talk:Ehler|talk]]) 03:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
+Why? [[User:The sleepwalker|The sleepwalker]] ([[User talk:The sleepwalker|talk]]) 04:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
+You’re also a Missouri-synod Lutheran. Well, his comment in summary says he was bored. It’s a childish exaggeration and it’s not helpful to discerning whether the movie is worth watching or not. Therefore, it doesn’t add anything to the article. [[User:The sleepwalker|The sleepwalker]] ([[User talk:The sleepwalker|talk]]) 04:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
+:It seems to me that it's criticizing several things at once; the quality of the voice acting and narrative structure, in addition to the themes. [[User:Blue Oceanman]] originally contributed the review, maybe he or she could provide some clarity as to why the source was originally chosen. There's not a lot of clear guidance from policies on what reviews to include, but I think [[WP:Balance]] might lend itself towards the merits of having a critical review. [[User:Ehler|Ehler]] ([[User talk:Ehler|talk]]) 22:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)