Jump to content

Talk:Maneuverable reentry vehicle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m tag for WP:MILHIST ! using AWB
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WPMILHIST|Weaponry=yes
{{WikiProject Military history|Weaponry=yes|class=Start|b1=no|b2=no|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}}
|class=Stub
}}
}}
==Untitled==
Isn't the [[Topol_M]] also a MaRV?
Isn't the [[Topol_M]] also a MaRV?


Line 12: Line 13:


This article is about nuclear weapons, not tanks. That belongs on another page. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.138.32.219|129.138.32.219]] ([[User talk:129.138.32.219|talk]]) 21:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This article is about nuclear weapons, not tanks. That belongs on another page. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.138.32.219|129.138.32.219]] ([[User talk:129.138.32.219|talk]]) 21:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== MARV vs. MIRV ==

After browsing the list of systems given in the article, most of their articles state they have MIRV capabilities while MARV is not mentioned. Maybe a cleanup is needed? --[[Special:Contributions/2.240.176.113|2.240.176.113]] ([[User talk:2.240.176.113|talk]]) 12:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

== Difference with quasiballistic missiles? ==

Both types of missile perform maneuvers in the terminal stage of their flight, so what exactly is the difference between MaRVs and [[Ballistic missile#Quasi-ballistic missiles|quasiballistics]]? [[User:Anthropophoca|Anthropophoca]] ([[User talk:Anthropophoca|talk]]) 01:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:51, 18 February 2024

Untitled

[edit]

Isn't the Topol_M also a MaRV?

To the best of my knowledge it's not known to be MARV equipped. the statements of various russian government sources as to its being able to manouver around ABM systems are just as easily explained by mid-course or bus manouvering, which have nothing to do with the reentry vehicle itself. I would, however, point out that the indian Agni 3 system is supposedly MARV equipped, and isnt mentioned in the article. I dont have a firm source, but perhaps someone else does? Certainly the agni article implies that the warhead has gps and/or tercom guidance, which implies it's manouverable.Quadbox (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the following from the main article:

== Fiction ==

This article is about nuclear weapons, not tanks. That belongs on another page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.138.32.219 (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MARV vs. MIRV

[edit]

After browsing the list of systems given in the article, most of their articles state they have MIRV capabilities while MARV is not mentioned. Maybe a cleanup is needed? --2.240.176.113 (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Difference with quasiballistic missiles?

[edit]

Both types of missile perform maneuvers in the terminal stage of their flight, so what exactly is the difference between MaRVs and quasiballistics? Anthropophoca (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]