Talk:Project Chanology: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Holy crap Lois!: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Scientology}}, {{WikiProject Internet culture}}, {{WikiProject Media}}. Tag: |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBanners |
|||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Not a forum}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Article history |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1=AFD |
|||
|action1date=28 January 2008 |
|||
|action1link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Chanology |
|||
|action1result=Keep |
|||
|action1oldid=187524081 |
|||
|action2=AFD |
|||
== This may become one of the most important things to happen on the internet == |
|||
|action2date=13 February 2008 |
|||
This may become one of the most important things to happen on the internet. I wouldn't be so quick to delete it. |
|||
|action2link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Chanology (2nd nomination) |
|||
|action2result=Speedy Keep |
|||
|action2oldid=191262529 |
|||
|action3=GAN |
|||
This is an on-going event and is expanding rapidly, it should be maintained. [[User:LamontCranston|LamontCranston]] 19:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action3date=28 February 2008 |
|||
|action3link=Talk:Project Chanology/Archive 2#Successful_good_article_nomination |
|||
|action3result=Listed |
|||
|action3oldid=194365257 |
|||
|action4=GAR |
|||
:I agree. This is getting a lot of play over at [[Digg]] and other social media sites ([http://www.digg.com/world_news/War_Breaks_Out_Between_Hackers_and_Scientology here] [http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/ANON_release_Scientology_secret_DOX here] [http://reddit.com/info/66equ/comments/ and here] for some examples). One of those links to a [[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] article and I'm sure we can find lots of other news articles detailing this. I certainly wouldn't "speedy" delete this. Put it up for deletion the old fashioned way. <font style="background:#b22222;">'''[[User:JHMM13|<font style="color:white;font-size:105%">JHMM13</font>]]'''[[User talk:JHMM13|<sup><small><font style="color:#fff;">(Disc)</font></small></sup>]]</font> 08:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action4date=28 February 2008 |
|||
:: Aside from the fact that the article <i>still</i> doesn't <strong>assert</strong> the notability, Digg and other social media sites (i.e. any site with user-generated content) don't cut it as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. [[User:Dethme0w|Dethme0w]] ([[User talk:Dethme0w|talk]]) 08:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action4link=Talk:Project Chanology/Archive 2#Delisted |
|||
|action4result=delisted |
|||
|action4oldid=194365257 |
|||
|action5= GAR |
|||
:::If you need reliable media - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APC_%28magazine%29 Australian Personal Computer ] magazine has picked it up. They're the largest PC print publication in Australia. Article [http://www.apcmag.com/7905/anonymous_threatens_to_dismantle_church_of_scientology_via_internet here]. Deletion is wrong at this stage. Give it a few days. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Flow aus|Flow aus]] ([[User talk:Flow aus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Flow aus|contribs]]) 09:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
|action5date= 21:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::: You should add that to the external links at least. I have removed the tags, but the article needs inline references. [[User:Dethme0w|Dethme0w]] ([[User talk:Dethme0w|talk]]) 09:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action5link= Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Project Chanology/1 |
|||
|action5result= listed |
|||
|action5oldid=197809573 |
|||
|action6= PR |
|||
Wired magazine is covering the attacks now. [http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/01/anonymous-attac.html] Does that count as a reliable source? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Avpmechman|Avpmechman]] ([[User talk:Avpmechman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Avpmechman|contribs]]) 00:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
|action6date= 01 May 2009 |
|||
== Deletion == |
|||
|action6link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Project Chanology/archive1 |
|||
Although I do think this whole thing is quite funny, 13 year old script kiddies on 4chan aren't significant enough for a Wikipedia article, especially without citations. DDoSes happen thousands of times ever day, not every one deserves an article. I've nominated for prod. |
|||
|action6result= reviewed |
|||
[[User:Miserlou|Miserlou]] ([[User talk:Miserlou|talk]]) 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action6oldid=284930569 |
|||
:The external links and linking to other wiki Scientology pages cover it, if you need to be redundent then add citations [[User:LamontCranston|LamontCranston]] 7:45, 25 January (UTC) |
|||
|topic=Socsci |
|||
:The attack has been going on for the past week. They are releasing Scientology documents. There are fliers being handed out at physical locations. This isn't just 13 year old script kiddies on 4chan anymore. It's bigger now. Much bigger now. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.66.18.186|76.66.18.186]] ([[User talk:76.66.18.186|talk]]) 04:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
|currentstatus=GA |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Media|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{To do}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|||
|counter = 3 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|algo = old(30d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Project Chanology/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
== |
== Etymology == |
||
[[WP:NOTABILITY]] states that a topic is notable if "it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". This topic has been covered by publications such as [[Wired]][http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/01/anonymous-attac.html], [[APC Magazine]][http://www.apcmag.com/7905/anonymous_threatens_to_dismantle_church_of_scientology_via_internet], [[National Post]][http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2008/01/24/scientology-under-digital-assault-by-web-vigilantes.aspx] and [[Sky News]][http://youtube.com/watch?v=uVaQG67eqwA]. This is clear adherence of [[WP:NOTABILITY]] and [[WP:WEB]], meaning that the article can be kept. Any attempts to delete this article are likely to fail. --[[User:Teggles|Teggles]] ([[User talk:Teggles|talk]]) 04:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I can't see anything in the article about the etymology of the word "Chanology". Is it derived from 4chan/711chan? If so (or even if not), surely there's a reliable source somewhere that can be found for it? Not knowing where the name came from is a serious limitation of the article. [[Special:Contributions/2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445]] ([[User talk:2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|talk]]) 13:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Peter Griffin|Holy crap Lois!]] == |
|||
:I found it out by myself. [[Special:Contributions/2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445]] ([[User talk:2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|talk]]) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} |
|||
Wow, someone wrote an article on Project Chanology in [[Suomi]]! That was fast. [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Please create an "Etymology" section at the top of the article, and add: |
|||
:"The word "Chanology" is a [[portmanteau]] of [[4chan]] (the site where the project originated) and "Scientology."<ref>{{cite thesis |last=Huang |first=Juanjuan |date=2015 |title=Values and Symbolism in Anonymous’s Brand Identity |type=MA thesis |page=13 |publisher=Duke University |url=https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/10356/Values%20and%20Symbolism%20in%20Anonymous%27s%20Brand%20Identity.pdf |access-date=April 17, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Olson |first1=Parmy |title=We Are Anonymous |date=2013 |publisher=Random House |isbn=9781448136155 |page=476 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ucE1AAAAQBAJ |access-date=April 17, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
{{Reflist-talk}} |
|||
Please also add {{'"}}Chanology" is a portmanteau of "chan" and "Scientology{{"'}} as the second sentence of the lead. [[Special:Contributions/2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445]] ([[User talk:2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445|talk]]) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Semi-protection-unlocked.svg|28px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to [[Help:Editing|edit the page yourself]]. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 12:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:13, 24 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project Chanology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Project Chanology. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Project Chanology at the Reference desk. |
Project Chanology has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Etymology
[edit]I can't see anything in the article about the etymology of the word "Chanology". Is it derived from 4chan/711chan? If so (or even if not), surely there's a reliable source somewhere that can be found for it? Not knowing where the name came from is a serious limitation of the article. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445 (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- I found it out by myself. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445 (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please create an "Etymology" section at the top of the article, and add:
- "The word "Chanology" is a portmanteau of 4chan (the site where the project originated) and "Scientology."[1][2]
References
- ^ Huang, Juanjuan (2015). Values and Symbolism in Anonymous’s Brand Identity (PDF) (MA thesis). Duke University. p. 13. Retrieved April 17, 2022.
- ^ Olson, Parmy (2013). We Are Anonymous. Random House. p. 476. ISBN 9781448136155. Retrieved April 17, 2022.
Please also add '"Chanology" is a portmanteau of "chan" and "Scientology"' as the second sentence of the lead. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445 (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class Scientology articles
- Low-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- GA-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- GA-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists