Talk:Quantitative electroencephalography: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Endophenotypes: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}, {{WikiProject Epilepsy}}, {{WikiProject Neuroscience}}. Tag: |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20111224145939|reviewer=Chzz}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Low |neurology=yes |neurology-imp=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Epilepsy |importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Neuroscience |importance=Mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Endophenotypes == |
== Endophenotypes == |
||
Line 8: | Line 13: | ||
So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the [[patent nonsense]]. [[Special:Contributions/24.205.239.229|24.205.239.229]] ([[User talk:24.205.239.229|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the [[patent nonsense]]. [[Special:Contributions/24.205.239.229|24.205.239.229]] ([[User talk:24.205.239.229|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Clean up time == |
|||
I think it's time to clean this up a little. --[[User:IcyEd|IcyEd]] ([[User talk:IcyEd|talk]]) 08:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
OK, this is much better than it was, although it is still missing citations and other references. After much thought I deleted the original references list as it was next to useless. --[[User:IcyEd|IcyEd]] ([[User talk:IcyEd|talk]]) 08:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:55, 24 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantitative electroencephalography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Endophenotypes
[edit]- These (EEG) patterns appear to be generally inheritable, with similar spectral profiles for monozygotic twins, and have been proposed as endophenotypes
- The underlying EEG variance is almost totally predicted by the endophenotypes
So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the patent nonsense. 24.205.239.229 (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Clean up time
[edit]I think it's time to clean this up a little. --IcyEd (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
OK, this is much better than it was, although it is still missing citations and other references. After much thought I deleted the original references list as it was next to useless. --IcyEd (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/24 December 2011
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- Start-Class neurology articles
- Mid-importance neurology articles
- Neurology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class Epilepsy articles
- Mid-importance Epilepsy articles
- WikiProject Epilepsy articles
- Start-Class neuroscience articles
- Mid-importance neuroscience articles