Jump to content

Talk:Quantitative electroencephalography: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Endophenotypes: new section
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}, {{WikiProject Epilepsy}}, {{WikiProject Neuroscience}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20111224145939|reviewer=Chzz}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20111224145939|reviewer=Chzz}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Low |neurology=yes |neurology-imp=mid}}
{{WikiProject Epilepsy |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Neuroscience |importance=Mid}}
}}


== Endophenotypes ==
== Endophenotypes ==
Line 8: Line 13:


So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the [[patent nonsense]]. [[Special:Contributions/24.205.239.229|24.205.239.229]] ([[User talk:24.205.239.229|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the [[patent nonsense]]. [[Special:Contributions/24.205.239.229|24.205.239.229]] ([[User talk:24.205.239.229|talk]]) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

== Clean up time ==

I think it's time to clean this up a little. --[[User:IcyEd|IcyEd]] ([[User talk:IcyEd|talk]]) 08:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, this is much better than it was, although it is still missing citations and other references. After much thought I deleted the original references list as it was next to useless. --[[User:IcyEd|IcyEd]] ([[User talk:IcyEd|talk]]) 08:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:55, 24 February 2024

Endophenotypes

[edit]
  • These (EEG) patterns appear to be generally inheritable, with similar spectral profiles for monozygotic twins, and have been proposed as endophenotypes
  • The underlying EEG variance is almost totally predicted by the endophenotypes

So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the patent nonsense. 24.205.239.229 (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up time

[edit]

I think it's time to clean this up a little. --IcyEd (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this is much better than it was, although it is still missing citations and other references. After much thought I deleted the original references list as it was next to useless. --IcyEd (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]