Talk:Ranthambore Fort: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject India}}, {{WikiProject Architecture}}, {{WikiProject Historic sites}}. Tag: |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
||
{{WikiProject India|importance=Low|history=yes|history-importance=mid|pre=yes|rajasthan=yes|rajasthan-importance=high|assess-date=January 2020}} |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Fortifications=yes|South-Asian=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Historic sites|importance=}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==[Untitled]== |
|||
The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/42.109.160.92|42.109.160.92]] ([[User talk:42.109.160.92|talk]]) 03:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Disputed dates == |
|||
The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... |
|||
I can't find much beyond tourist books, and UNESCO isn't infallible but it does show that the date of its foundation isn't definite.[http://hillfortsrajasthan.nic.in/ranthambore-fort/history.html] [[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]]) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:I am coming from {{u|Sam Sailor}}'s talk page. I have no opinion on the content but the link you mentioned above isn't from [[UNESCO]]. It's a Government website which is ''about'' the [[Hill Forts of Rajasthan]] which only happens to be a World Heritage Site. [[User:Solomon7968|Solomon]][[User talk:Solomon7968|7968]] 17:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:39, 24 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.109.160.92 (talk) 03:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Disputed dates
[edit]I can't find much beyond tourist books, and UNESCO isn't infallible but it does show that the date of its foundation isn't definite.[1] Doug Weller (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- I am coming from Sam Sailor's talk page. I have no opinion on the content but the link you mentioned above isn't from UNESCO. It's a Government website which is about the Hill Forts of Rajasthan which only happens to be a World Heritage Site. Solomon7968 17:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Rajasthan articles
- High-importance Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Rajasthan articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Historic sites articles
- Unknown-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles