Jump to content

Talk:Ranthambore Fort: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject India}}, {{WikiProject Architecture}}, {{WikiProject Historic sites}}.
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP India|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject India|importance=Low|history=yes|history-importance=mid|pre=yes|rajasthan=yes|rajasthan-importance=high|assess-date=January 2020}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=start|Fortifications=yes|South-Asian=yes}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Fortifications=yes|South-Asian=yes}}
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Historic sites|importance=}}
}}


==[Untitled]==
The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/42.109.160.92|42.109.160.92]] ([[User talk:42.109.160.92|talk]]) 03:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Disputed dates ==
The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan .....

I can't find much beyond tourist books, and UNESCO isn't infallible but it does show that the date of its foundation isn't definite.[http://hillfortsrajasthan.nic.in/ranthambore-fort/history.html] [[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]]) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
:I am coming from {{u|Sam Sailor}}'s talk page. I have no opinion on the content but the link you mentioned above isn't from [[UNESCO]]. It's a Government website which is ''about'' the [[Hill Forts of Rajasthan]] which only happens to be a World Heritage Site. [[User:Solomon7968|Solomon]][[User talk:Solomon7968|7968]] 17:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:39, 24 February 2024

[Untitled]

[edit]

The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.109.160.92 (talk) 03:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed dates

[edit]

I can't find much beyond tourist books, and UNESCO isn't infallible but it does show that the date of its foundation isn't definite.[1] Doug Weller (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am coming from Sam Sailor's talk page. I have no opinion on the content but the link you mentioned above isn't from UNESCO. It's a Government website which is about the Hill Forts of Rajasthan which only happens to be a World Heritage Site. Solomon7968 17:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]