Jump to content

Eduardo Zorita: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
KasparBot (talk | contribs)
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Spanish paleoclimatologist}}
[[File:Zorita thumbnail.jpg|thumb|Eduardo Zorita]]
[[File:Zorita thumbnail.jpg|thumb|Eduardo Zorita]]


'''Eduardo Zorita''' (born in [[Madrid]], 1961) is a Spanish [[paleoclimatologist]]. {{Asof|2010}}, he is a Senior Scientist at the Institute for Coastal Research,<ref>[http://www.gkss.de/institute/coastal_research/index.html.en]</ref> GKSS Research Centre in [[Geesthacht, Germany]], where he has worked since 1996. Zorita was a contributing author to the [[IPCC Fourth Assessment Report|Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC]], and is review editor of the journal ''[[Climate Research (journal)|Climate Research]]''.
'''Eduardo Zorita''' (born 1961 in [[Madrid]]) is a Spanish [[paleoclimatologist]]. {{As of|2010}}, he is a Senior Scientist at the Institute for Coastal Research,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.gkss.de/institute/coastal_research/index.html.en |title=Institute for Coastal Research |access-date=2010-10-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101017232405/http://www.gkss.de/institute/coastal_research/index.html.en |archive-date=2010-10-17 |url-status=dead }}</ref> GKSS Research Centre in [[Geesthacht, Germany]], where he has worked since 1996. Zorita is review editor of the journal ''[[Climate Research (journal)|Climate Research]]''.


== Professional life ==
Zorita received his Ph.D in [[solid state physics]] at the [[University of Zaragoza]] in 1988, and then held a [[postdoctoral]] appointment at the [[Max Planck Institute for Meteorology]],<ref>[http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/startseite.html]</ref> [[Hamburg]]. He was an Associate Researcher at the Laboratoire de Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie (LOCEAN), [[Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University]], [[Paris]], 1994–95.

Zorita received his Ph.D. in [[solid state physics]] at the [[University of Zaragoza]] in 1988, and then held a [[postdoctoral]] appointment at the [[Max Planck Institute for Meteorology]],<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/startseite.html |title=Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie: Home |access-date=2010-10-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101020161423/http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/startseite.html |archive-date=2010-10-20 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Hamburg]]. He was an Associate Researcher at the Laboratoire de Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie (LOCEAN), [[Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University]], [[Paris]], 1994–95.


Zorita is a regular contributor to ''Die Klimazwiebel'', a [[climate science]] blog operated by [[Hans von Storch]], Zorita and other climate scientists.
Zorita is a regular contributor to ''Die Klimazwiebel'', a [[climate science]] blog operated by [[Hans von Storch]], Zorita and other climate scientists.

In 2013 he was part of a research group confirming the [[hockey stick graph (global temperature)|hockey stick graph]] reconstruction.<ref>PAGES 2k Consortium: ''Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia''. [[Nature Geoscience]] 6, 2013, 339–346, {{doi|10.1038/ngeo1797}}.</ref>


==Climatic Research Unit email controversy==
==Climatic Research Unit email controversy==
At the outset of the [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] (Climategate) Zorita published his opinion on his personal wab site. This was republished by the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' on 5 December 2009:<ref name="WSJ 2009">{{cite web | title=Notable & Quotable | website=Wall Street Journal | date=5 December 2009 | quote=Eduardo Zorita, a climate scientist at Germany's GKSS Research Center, writing on his personal Web site about the Climategate email scandal. | url=http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704107104574572093483921568 | accessdate=23 June 2015}}</ref>
At the outset of the [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] (Climategate) Zorita published his opinion on his personal web site. This was republished by ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' on 5 December 2009:<ref name="WSJ 2009">{{cite web | title=Notable & Quotable | website=The Wall Street Journal | date=5 December 2009 | quote=Eduardo Zorita, a climate scientist at Germany's GKSS Research Center, writing on his personal Web site about the Climategate email scandal. | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704107104574572093483921568 | access-date=23 June 2015}}</ref>
{{quote|I may confirm what has been written in other places: research in some areas of climate science has been and is full of machination, conspiracies, and collusion, as any reader can interpret from the CRU-files. They depict a realistic, I would say even harmless, picture of what the real research in the area of the climate of the past millennium has been in the last years. The scientific debate has been in many instances hijacked to advance other agendas.
{{blockquote|I may confirm what has been written in other places: research in some areas of climate science has been and is full of machination, conspiracies, and collusion, as any reader can interpret from the CRU-files. They depict a realistic, I would say even harmless, picture of what the real research in the area of the climate of the past millennium has been in the last years. The scientific debate has been in many instances hijacked to advance other agendas.


I [do not] think anthropogenic climate change is a hoax. On the contrary, it is a question which we have to be very well aware of. But I am also aware that in this thick atmosphere—and I am not speaking of greenhouse gases now—editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations, even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed. In this atmosphere, Ph D students are often tempted to tweak their data so as to fit the "politically correct picture". Some, or many issues, about climate change are still not well known. Policy makers should be aware of the attempts to hide these uncertainties under a unified picture. I had the "pleasure" to experience all this in my area of research.|<ref name="WSJ 2009" />}}
I [do not] think anthropogenic climate change is a hoax. On the contrary, it is a question which we have to be very well aware of. But I am also aware that in this thick atmosphere—and I am not speaking of greenhouse gases now—editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations, even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed. In this atmosphere, Ph D students are often tempted to tweak their data so as to fit the "politically correct picture". Some, or many issues, about climate change are still not well known. Policy makers should be aware of the attempts to hide these uncertainties under a unified picture. I had the "pleasure" to experience all this in my area of research.|<ref name="WSJ 2009" />}}


Zorita set up the ''Klimazwiebel'' blog shortly afterwards, on 9 December 2009. In a 2012 interview with Hans von Storch, Zorita said "Climategate did not show that the essentials of climate science were wrong or that anthropogenic climate change is the result of a conspiracy. It did show that some scientists were impelled to present a clean story, cleaner than it really is, and in doing so they went a bit too far." He felt that in trying to present a clear message, scientists had lost public credibility, but independent groups checking work which appeared compromised found that the original conclusions were in order. In particular, the main [[temperature record|surface temperature datasets]] which had been called into question were confirmed by the [[Berkeley Earth|Muller et al.]] data analysis.<ref name="StorchZorita 2004">{{cite web | last=Storch | first=Hans von | title=Interview with Eduardo Zorita | website=Die Klimazwiebel | date=13 October 2012 | url=http://klimazwiebel.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/interview-with-eduardo-zorita.html | accessdate=23 June 2015}}</ref>
Zorita set up the ''Klimazwiebel'' blog shortly afterwards, on 9 December 2009. In a 2012 interview with [[Hans von Storch]], Zorita said "Climategate did not show that the essentials of climate science were wrong or that anthropogenic climate change is the result of a conspiracy. It did show that some scientists were impelled to present a clean story, cleaner than it really is, and in doing so they went a bit too far." He felt that in trying to present a clear message, scientists had lost public credibility, but independent groups checking work which appeared compromised found that the original conclusions were in order. In particular, the main [[temperature record|surface temperature datasets]] which had been called into question were confirmed by the [[Berkeley Earth|Muller et al.]] data analysis.<ref name="StorchZorita 2004">{{cite web | last=Storch | first=Hans von | title=Interview with Eduardo Zorita | website=Die Klimazwiebel | date=13 October 2012 | url=http://klimazwiebel.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/interview-with-eduardo-zorita.html | access-date=23 June 2015}}</ref>


==Selected publications==
==Selected publications==
Line 27: Line 32:
|volume=1 |issue=4 |pages=507
|volume=1 |issue=4 |pages=507
|doi=10.1002/wcc.53
|doi=10.1002/wcc.53
|s2cid=16524970
}}
|doi-access=free

|bibcode=2010WIRCC...1..507F
}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=Zorita |first1=E.
|last1=Zorita
|first1=E.
|year=2010
|year=2010
|title=European temperature records of the past five centuries based on documentary/instrumental information compared to climate simulations
|title=European temperature records of the past five centuries based on documentary/instrumental information compared to climate simulations
|url=http://dvsun3.gkss.de/journals/2010/Zorita-climchange.pdf
|url=http://dvsun3.gkss.de/journals/2010/Zorita-climchange.pdf
|journal=[[Climatic Change (journal)|Climate Change]]
|journal=[[Climatic Change (journal)|Climate Change]]
|volume=101 |issue= |pages=143
|volume=101
|issue=1–2
|pages=143–168
|doi=10.1007/s10584-010-9824-7
|doi=10.1007/s10584-010-9824-7
|bibcode=2010ClCh..101..143Z
}}
|s2cid=154874156

|access-date=2010-10-16
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719032446/http://dvsun3.gkss.de/journals/2010/Zorita-climchange.pdf
|archive-date=2011-07-19
|url-status=dead
}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=González-Rouco |first1=J. F.
|last1=González-Rouco |first1=J. F.
Line 48: Line 63:
|url=http://www.clim-past.net/5/97/2009/cp-5-97-2009.pdf
|url=http://www.clim-past.net/5/97/2009/cp-5-97-2009.pdf
|journal=[[Climate of the Past]]
|journal=[[Climate of the Past]]
|volume=5 |issue= |pages=97
|volume=5 |issue= 1|pages=97–127
|doi=10.5194/cp-5-97-2009
|doi=10.5194/cp-5-97-2009
|bibcode=2009CliPa...5...97G
}}
|doi-access=free

}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=Zorita |first1=E.
|last1=Zorita |first1=E.
Line 59: Line 75:
|title=How unusual is the recent series of warm years?
|title=How unusual is the recent series of warm years?
|journal=[[Geophysical Research Letters]]
|journal=[[Geophysical Research Letters]]
|volume=35 |issue=24 |page=
|volume=35 |issue=24
|pages=L24706
|bibcode=2008GeoRL..3524706Z
|bibcode=2008GeoRL..3524706Z
|doi=10.1029/2008GL036228
|doi=10.1029/2008GL036228
|url=http://www.hzg.de/imperia/md/content/gkss/zentrale_einrichtungen/bibliothek/journals/2008/Zorita-geophylet.pdf|doi-access=free
|laysource=[[Science Daily]]
}}
|laysummary=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090109115047.htm
**{{cite press release |date=10 January 2009 |title=Scientists Refute Argument Of Climate Skeptics |website=[[ScienceDaily]] |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090109115047.htm}}
|laydate=10 January 2009
}}

*{{cite web
*{{cite web
|last1=von Storch |first=H.
|last1=von Storch
|first1=H.
|last2=Zorita |first2=E.
|last2=Zorita
|first2=E.
|date=3 May 2007
|date=3 May 2007
|title=The decay of the hockey stick
|title=The decay of the hockey stick
Line 75: Line 92:
|work=Climate Feedback
|work=Climate Feedback
|publisher=[[Nature Climate Change]]
|publisher=[[Nature Climate Change]]
|access-date=16 October 2010
}}
|archive-date=2 January 2011
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110102185622/http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html
|url-status=dead
}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=von Storch |first1=H.
|last1=von Storch |first1=H.
Line 91: Line 111:
|doi=10.1126/science.1096109
|doi=10.1126/science.1096109
|pmid=15459344
|pmid=15459344
|s2cid=16329419
}}
|url=http://rcin.org.pl/Content/2291

}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=Zorita |first1=E.
|last1=Zorita |first1=E.
Line 98: Line 119:
|year=1999
|year=1999
|title=The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods
|title=The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods
|url=http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0442%281999%29012%3C2474%3ATAMAAS%3E2.0.CO%3B2
|journal=[[Journal of Climate]]
|journal=[[Journal of Climate]]
|volume=12 |issue=8 |pages=2474
|volume=12 |issue=8 |pages=2474
|bibcode=1999JCli...12.2474Z
|bibcode=1999JCli...12.2474Z
|doi=10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2474:TAMAAS>2.0.CO;2
|doi=10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2474:TAMAAS>2.0.CO;2
|doi-access=free
}}
}}

*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1=von Storch |first1=H.
|last1=von Storch |first1=H.
Line 111: Line 131:
|year=1993
|year=1993
|title=Downscaling of Global Climate Change Estimates to Regional Scales: An Application to Iberian Rainfall in Wintertime
|title=Downscaling of Global Climate Change Estimates to Regional Scales: An Application to Iberian Rainfall in Wintertime
|url=http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0442%281993%29006%3C1161%3ADOGCCE%3E2.0.CO%3B2
|journal=[[Journal of Climate]]
|journal=[[Journal of Climate]]
|volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=1161
|volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=1161
|bibcode=1993JCli....6.1161V
|bibcode=1993JCli....6.1161V
|doi=10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1161:DOGCCE>2.0.CO;2
|doi=10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1161:DOGCCE>2.0.CO;2
|hdl=21.11116/0000-0000-D54B-C
}}
|hdl-access=free

}}
==See also==
*[[Hockey stick controversy]]


==References==
==References==
Line 125: Line 143:


==Sources and external links==
==Sources and external links==
*[http://coast.gkss.de/staff/zorita/ Eduardo Zorita's home page] at the Institute for Coastal Research
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20110503222057/http://coast.gkss.de/staff/zorita/ Eduardo Zorita's home page] at the Institute for Coastal Research
*[http://klimazwiebel.blogspot.com/ Die Klimazwiebel] blog
*[http://klimazwiebel.blogspot.com/ Die Klimazwiebel] blog
*[http://www.flickr.com/photos/23797354@N02/ Zorita's Photostream] at [[Flickr]]
*[https://www.flickr.com/photos/23797354@N02/ Zorita's Photostream] at [[Flickr]]

{{authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Zorita, Eduardo}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Zorita, Eduardo}}
[[Category:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change contributing authors]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Spanish scientists]]
[[Category:Spanish scientists]]

Latest revision as of 22:49, 25 February 2024

Eduardo Zorita

Eduardo Zorita (born 1961 in Madrid) is a Spanish paleoclimatologist. As of 2010, he is a Senior Scientist at the Institute for Coastal Research,[1] GKSS Research Centre in Geesthacht, Germany, where he has worked since 1996. Zorita is review editor of the journal Climate Research.

Professional life

[edit]

Zorita received his Ph.D. in solid state physics at the University of Zaragoza in 1988, and then held a postdoctoral appointment at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology,[2] Hamburg. He was an Associate Researcher at the Laboratoire de Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie (LOCEAN), Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University, Paris, 1994–95.

Zorita is a regular contributor to Die Klimazwiebel, a climate science blog operated by Hans von Storch, Zorita and other climate scientists.

In 2013 he was part of a research group confirming the hockey stick graph reconstruction.[3]

Climatic Research Unit email controversy

[edit]

At the outset of the Climatic Research Unit email controversy (Climategate) Zorita published his opinion on his personal web site. This was republished by The Wall Street Journal on 5 December 2009:[4]

I may confirm what has been written in other places: research in some areas of climate science has been and is full of machination, conspiracies, and collusion, as any reader can interpret from the CRU-files. They depict a realistic, I would say even harmless, picture of what the real research in the area of the climate of the past millennium has been in the last years. The scientific debate has been in many instances hijacked to advance other agendas. I [do not] think anthropogenic climate change is a hoax. On the contrary, it is a question which we have to be very well aware of. But I am also aware that in this thick atmosphere—and I am not speaking of greenhouse gases now—editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations, even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed. In this atmosphere, Ph D students are often tempted to tweak their data so as to fit the "politically correct picture". Some, or many issues, about climate change are still not well known. Policy makers should be aware of the attempts to hide these uncertainties under a unified picture. I had the "pleasure" to experience all this in my area of research.

— [4]

Zorita set up the Klimazwiebel blog shortly afterwards, on 9 December 2009. In a 2012 interview with Hans von Storch, Zorita said "Climategate did not show that the essentials of climate science were wrong or that anthropogenic climate change is the result of a conspiracy. It did show that some scientists were impelled to present a clean story, cleaner than it really is, and in doing so they went a bit too far." He felt that in trying to present a clear message, scientists had lost public credibility, but independent groups checking work which appeared compromised found that the original conclusions were in order. In particular, the main surface temperature datasets which had been called into question were confirmed by the Muller et al. data analysis.[5]

Selected publications

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Institute for Coastal Research". Archived from the original on 2010-10-17. Retrieved 2010-10-16.
  2. ^ "Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie: Home". Archived from the original on 2010-10-20. Retrieved 2010-10-16.
  3. ^ PAGES 2k Consortium: Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia. Nature Geoscience 6, 2013, 339–346, doi:10.1038/ngeo1797.
  4. ^ a b "Notable & Quotable". The Wall Street Journal. 5 December 2009. Retrieved 23 June 2015. Eduardo Zorita, a climate scientist at Germany's GKSS Research Center, writing on his personal Web site about the Climategate email scandal.
  5. ^ Storch, Hans von (13 October 2012). "Interview with Eduardo Zorita". Die Klimazwiebel. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
[edit]