Talk:She's Gotta Have It: Difference between revisions
Andrzejbanas (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Film}}, {{WikiProject Library of Congress}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Comedy}}. Tag: |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
==Plot== |
|||
The last two paragraphs of the plot summary contain some pretty wild interpretations of the events. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pdlla|Pdlla]] ([[User talk:Pdlla|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pdlla|contribs]]) 17:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Current Availability == |
|||
Since the DVD was released in North America today, this section should be removed or altered to match that. [[User:RMThompson|RMThompson]] ([[User talk:RMThompson|talk]]) 20:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Laserdisc == |
==Laserdisc == |
||
Line 8: | Line 18: | ||
== Background == |
== Background == |
||
I've shifted the focus slightly, particularly regarding the word ''depictions''. Depictions of African-Americans had already shifted in films such as ''[[Trading Places]]'', ''[[48 Hours]]'', and ''[[The Brother from Another Planet]]'' but this was the first such film where African-Americans had creative control and no white person plays a leading role in the cast. < |
I've shifted the focus slightly, particularly regarding the word ''depictions''. Depictions of African-Americans had already shifted in films such as ''[[Trading Places]]'', ''[[48 Hours (film)|48 Hours]]'', and ''[[The Brother from Another Planet]]'' but this was the first such film where African-Americans had creative control and no white person plays a leading role in the cast. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charg]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">e!</span>]]''</sup></span> 01:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Fair use rationale for Image:She's Gotta Have It (movie).jpg== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]] |
|||
'''[[:Image:She's Gotta Have It (movie).jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]]. |
|||
Please go to [[:Image:She's Gotta Have It (movie).jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|||
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 --> |
|||
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Nola Darling a real or fictional character? Spike Lee's comments about Nola Darling becoming a Jehovah's Witness== |
|||
I don't know much about Nola Darling, but this interview seems to speak of her as a real character. Spike Lee says she became a Jehovah's Witness. They have a picture of her with a Watchtower. http://theurbandaily.com/1932891/spike-lee-nola-darling-mookie-redhook-summer/ |
|||
Comments??? Thanks. [[User:Naturalpsychology|Natural]] ([[User talk:Naturalpsychology|talk]]) 12:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)natural |
|||
== Remove the "Themes" section? == |
|||
The "Themes" section reads like a poorly constructed undergraduate college essay. It is someone's literary analysis, not objective information. If the commentary is to be included, it should be attributed to the critics responsible for the commentary. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.174.24.153|76.174.24.153]] ([[User talk:76.174.24.153|talk]]) 19:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 04:20, 26 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plot
[edit]The last two paragraphs of the plot summary contain some pretty wild interpretations of the events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdlla (talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Current Availability
[edit]Since the DVD was released in North America today, this section should be removed or altered to match that. RMThompson (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Laserdisc
[edit]The term "ill-fated laserdisc format" is a weasel phrase. The LD format was around for 22 years as well as pioneered letterboxing, commentary tracks, director's cuts, and pristine transfers of film elements. It wasn't betamax.
Background
[edit]I've shifted the focus slightly, particularly regarding the word depictions. Depictions of African-Americans had already shifted in films such as Trading Places, 48 Hours, and The Brother from Another Planet but this was the first such film where African-Americans had creative control and no white person plays a leading role in the cast. DurovaCharge! 01:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:She's Gotta Have It (movie).jpg
[edit]Image:She's Gotta Have It (movie).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Nola Darling a real or fictional character? Spike Lee's comments about Nola Darling becoming a Jehovah's Witness
[edit]I don't know much about Nola Darling, but this interview seems to speak of her as a real character. Spike Lee says she became a Jehovah's Witness. They have a picture of her with a Watchtower. http://theurbandaily.com/1932891/spike-lee-nola-darling-mookie-redhook-summer/ Comments??? Thanks. Natural (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)natural
Remove the "Themes" section?
[edit]The "Themes" section reads like a poorly constructed undergraduate college essay. It is someone's literary analysis, not objective information. If the commentary is to be included, it should be attributed to the critics responsible for the commentary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.24.153 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles