Jump to content

Talk:Fred Shero: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Nickname (via reftalk bot)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Ice Hockey}}.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
|currentstatus=GA
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=sports
|topic=sports
|otd2date=2020-10-23|otd2oldid=985002868
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|living=no|listas=Shero, Fred|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Canada|sport=yes|mb=yes|class=GA|auto=inherit|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Canada|sport=yes|mb=yes|auto=inherit|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|sports-work-group=yes|listas=Shero, Fred}}
{{WikiProject Biography|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low}}
{{WikiProject Ice Hockey|bio=yes|class=GA|phi=yes}}
{{WikiProject Ice Hockey|bio=yes|phi=yes}}
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 05:24, 26 February 2024

Good articleFred Shero has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
November 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 23, 2020.
Current status: Good article

Nickname

[edit]

Putting nickname and source here for future use in prose. The Fog[1] -Djsasso (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fred Shero/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: intelatitalk 06:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

The bolded things need attention.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    All Good
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Well referenced, and no synthesis
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Well written, and easy to understand. even for a hockey n00b
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    yep
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit wars
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Hmmm... My first two GA nominations have little to no pictures. :/
I like pretty pictures, so can you find a team photo or something like that?
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a nitpicky thing, the "Personal life" seems a little small. can you expand on it?
I expanded the personal life section, as for the pictures I searched through Flickr and emailed a couple of users one didn't want to change the licensing the other one, who had a picture of the team that looked to be a photo taken by a no-professional (which makes me think they might hold the copy rights), but they have not responded and I doubt they will at this point. I don't know where else to find free images and I think that attempting to add it under fair use would fail Contextual significance. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll pass this one. --intelatitalk 17:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Risky moves have paid off for Penguins". Associated Press. 2008-05-07. Retrieved 2008-05-07.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fred Shero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fred Shero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fred Shero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Fred Shero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]