Talk:Shill: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2019;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:46, 26 February 2024

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Etymology

The etymology section in this article is within the scope of the Etymology task force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of etymology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EtymologyWikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/EtymologyTemplate:Etymology sectionEtymology

Gambling High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Start‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
-{{WikiProject Business |class=Start |importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Business |importance=High}}
-{{etymology section}}
+{{Etymology section}}
-{{WikiProject Gambling |class=Start |importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Gambling |importance=High}}
-{{WikiProject Journalism |class=Start |importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=High}}
 {{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|class=Start|importance=Top}}
-{{WikiProject Philosophy |class=Start |importance=Mid |ethics=Yes}}
+{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=Mid |ethics=Yes}}
-{{WikiProject Internet |class=Start |importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Internet |importance=Mid}}
 }}
 {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Shill/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
-== Further potential content ==
-I'm going to draw up a list of well sourced additions to make. I'll be focusing on the state practice of shilling, where there is information available. I will not be making dubious claims as above and instead focusing on allegations and documented fact where available. I may also change the structure of the page. Do people think that it needs a definition vs. history section? With a history section we could list famous examples and this is pretty typical for a word.
-Content I will probably add:
- * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Senor Freebie|Senor Freebie]] ([[User talk:Senor Freebie|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Senor Freebie|contribs]]) 23:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
- * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
- * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mass_Appeal
- * Elements of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Chaos
- * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Student_Association  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Senor Freebie|Senor Freebie]] ([[User talk:Senor Freebie|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Senor Freebie|contribs]]) 15:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
- * Particularly information from this source <nowiki>http://www.nowpublic.com/world/uncovered-british-journalists-who-are-spooks</nowiki>
- * Some of this mans claims http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Shayler
- * Relation to a false flag operation
- * Relation to a puppet regime, eg. that they often claim to represent their nation but actually represent another power
- * Relation to state sponsored counter-revolutionaries / insurgents? This seems like perhaps a bit of a stretch.
- * More later ... feel free to put stuff into a list for me that you want added.--[[User:Senor Freebie|Senor Freebie]] ([[User talk:Senor Freebie|talk]]) 22:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
-== Shills in the justice system ==
-I would like to see a section in this article about [[jurors]] who might be "planted" with the intent to influence the [[verdict]] in a trial. [[Special:Contributions/216.23.185.158|216.23.185.158]] ([[User talk:216.23.185.158|talk]]) 22:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-: That'd probably be deemed as contempt of court, perverting the course of justice or even perjury. [[User:Mere Mortal|Mere Mortal]] ([[User talk:Mere Mortal|talk]]) 19:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
-== Business "shill" ==
-Regarding {{diff|Shill|646901221|643478177|this edit}}, which was {{diff|Shill|653421004|653180569|repeated recently}}: The issue is not whether the material is factual, or even whether the writing needs improvement. The problem is that the section is entirely unsourced, and I can't independently find any sources that discuss this concept. It also doesn't appear to match the definition of ''shill'', which is "a person who publicly helps a person or organization ''without disclosing'' that they have a close relationship with the person or organization." (emphasis mine) What's described in the passage in question is a person who ''does'' have a public relationship with the person or organization. It certainly sounds like bad-faith business practices, but I don't see the connection to this article. [[User:Ibadibam|Ibadibam]] ([[User talk:Ibadibam|talk]]) 18:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
-:I agree with your reversions on that. I have no idea the source of that huge description of a business shill, nor have I heard of any examples. But it looks like the contributor should write a letter to a newspaper or get this onto her blog or something. While this may have happened once or twice, and these folks may be called shills, it hardly seems likely that we need to describe it here in such lurid (and generic) detail. Angelina, if you are watching this, why don't you write a letter to your attorney general or trade commission or board or minister of trade or something. [[User:Uruiamme|I like to saw logs!]] ([[User talk:Uruiamme|talk]]) 18:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
-== memes ==
-Russian shills use anti western memes.<ref>https://globalvoices.org/2015/07/13/open-source-information-reveals-pro-kremlin-web-campaign/</ref>
-This was reverted. Please discuss. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 20:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
-:Sorry, I meant to respond earlier but got caught up. The thing is, I'm not seeing the connection in the source. The source makes no mention of shills, and the only mention it makes of memes is that it discusses the existence of a repository of memes and other images that includes pro-Russian work. It doesn't discuss how they are used, just that they exist. Another article from The Guardian is linked to from that one, but it is focused on trolling. Either way, it only mentions the images briefly, and is mostly focused on the forum posts. So I'm not sure why the brief mention of using images for trolling would be highlighted here. - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 11:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
-::They are paid to promote a viewpoint online. Isn't that the definition of a shill? [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 13:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)