Jump to content

Talk:Strong NP-completeness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Medico80 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computer science}}, {{Maths rating}}, {{WikiProject Systems}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=high<!-- mid? -->}}
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=mid<!-- low? -->}}
{{WikiProject Systems|importance=mid<!-- low? -->|field=operations research}}
}}

==More examples==
A list of strongly NP-hard problems would be fine! The article does not
even mention only one example. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.73.110.246|92.73.110.246]] ([[User talk:92.73.110.246|talk]]) 06:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Merge==
==Merge==
I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... [[User:Medico80|Medico80]] 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... [[User:Medico80|Medico80]] 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

:Haha, umm...a good question. As the one who created it I wouldn't have any problem with merging the information into the [[NP-completeness]] article; I just saw some article linking to this (non-existent) page so thought creating it would be a good idea. If the info is put into the [[NP-completeness]] article, should we make this one redirect there? [[User:Flaxter|Flaxter]] 02:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

::Yes, I think that is the way to do it. Cheers :-) [[User:Medico80|Medico80]] 19:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.229.163.140|80.229.163.140]] ([[User talk:80.229.163.140|talk]]) 20:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==strong-NP-hardness not defined correctly==
the definition the article gives is:
: A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a polynomial reduction to it;
This is not correct, right would be:
: A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if any strongly NP problem has a polynomial reduction to it[[Special:Contributions/2A02:1205:34D9:C2F0:74E5:7FDB:9D8C:1944|2A02:1205:34D9:C2F0:74E5:7FDB:9D8C:1944]] ([[User talk:2A02:1205:34D9:C2F0:74E5:7FDB:9D8C:1944|talk]]) 12:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Also, about the same sentence
: A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a polynomial reduction to it
According to Garey and Johnson 1978, 1979, it seems that the correct sentence would be:
: A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a pseudo-polynomial reduction to it [[User:Bweps|Bweps]] ([[User talk:Bweps|talk]]) 11:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:57, 27 February 2024

More examples

[edit]

A list of strongly NP-hard problems would be fine! The article does not even mention only one example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.73.110.246 (talk) 06:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... Medico80 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, umm...a good question. As the one who created it I wouldn't have any problem with merging the information into the NP-completeness article; I just saw some article linking to this (non-existent) page so thought creating it would be a good idea. If the info is put into the NP-completeness article, should we make this one redirect there? Flaxter 02:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think that is the way to do it. Cheers :-) Medico80 19:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.163.140 (talk) 20:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

strong-NP-hardness not defined correctly

[edit]

the definition the article gives is:

A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a polynomial reduction to it;

This is not correct, right would be:

A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if any strongly NP problem has a polynomial reduction to it2A02:1205:34D9:C2F0:74E5:7FDB:9D8C:1944 (talk) 12:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, about the same sentence

A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a polynomial reduction to it

According to Garey and Johnson 1978, 1979, it seems that the correct sentence would be:

A problem is said to be strongly NP-hard if a strongly NP-complete problem has a pseudo-polynomial reduction to it Bweps (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]