Talk:The Profit (film): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Nehrams2020 (talk | contribs) m article meets the B-class criteria for WP:FILM |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Film}}, {{WikiProject Scientology}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Comedy}}. Tag: |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{Article history |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
| action1 = GAN |
| action1 = GAN |
||
| action1date = December 22, 2007 |
| action1date = December 22, 2007 |
||
Line 14: | Line 8: | ||
| action1oldid = 177674187 |
| action1oldid = 177674187 |
||
| currentstatus = FGAN}} |
| currentstatus = FGAN}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}} |
|||
{{sanctions}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Scientology|importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBanners |
|||
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low|NRM=yes|NRMImp=Mid}} |
|||
|1 = {{Film|class=B|B-Class-1=yes|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Low}} |
|||
|3 = {{WPReligion|class=B|importance=Low}} |
|||
|4 = {{Comedy|class=B|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== Intro size == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Profit&diff=409825096&oldid=408412124 diff] = this edit by {{user|Laval}} is inappropriate. Per [[WP:LEAD]], the intro/lede should be able to function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, including every single subsection of the article. Please, do not do this again without discussion on the talk page. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:[[WP:LEAD]] states: [[WP:LEAD|''"The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject should usually be established in the first few sentences."'']] Please make sure to adhere to this. Thanks. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== actor credits incorrect == |
|||
== My edit listing who the main characters were based on == |
|||
Mr. Hunt played by Lanny Fuettere, Mrs. Hunt, his wife, not credited, played by Sandra(Sandy) Mitchell not the name listed. Thank you for correcting [[User:Mamahunt1002|Mamahunt1002]] ([[User talk:Mamahunt1002|talk]]) 22:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
My edit listing who the main characters were based on was reverted as it was "WP:OR and POV interpretations of who cast represent". I'm not sure if [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] saw the movie, but the characterizations are thinly veiled. It's not an interpretation when it is made to be super obvious. Zach Carson, for example, is based on [[Jack Parsons]]. The name is barely changed. The "[[Babalon Working]]" is now the "Caliban Working". Carson put in $20,000 instead of Parson who put in $21,000 into selling sailboats. Legend has Parsons evocating Bartzabel to summon a typhoon in retribution, in the movie Carson evoked Satan. How obvious does it have to be not to be considered POV? [[User:Chiok|Chiok]] ([[User talk:Chiok|talk]]) 02:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Do you have a source to back up your personal interpretations into the film's plot? If not, this is your own [[WP:OR]] interpretations ''of'' the film - which does not belong in the plot section, or anywhere in the article for that matter, as it is unsourced. [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 05:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 27 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Profit (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
The Profit (film) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intro size
[edit]diff = this edit by Laval (talk · contribs) is inappropriate. Per WP:LEAD, the intro/lede should be able to function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, including every single subsection of the article. Please, do not do this again without discussion on the talk page. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- WP:LEAD states: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject should usually be established in the first few sentences." Please make sure to adhere to this. Thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
actor credits incorrect
[edit]Mr. Hunt played by Lanny Fuettere, Mrs. Hunt, his wife, not credited, played by Sandra(Sandy) Mitchell not the name listed. Thank you for correcting Mamahunt1002 (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class Scientology articles
- Mid-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- B-Class New religious movements articles
- Mid-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles