Jump to content

Talk:The Profit (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nehrams2020 (talk | contribs)
m article meets the B-class criteria for WP:FILM
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Film}}, {{WikiProject Scientology}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Comedy}}.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{Not a forum|Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the [[The Profit|Wikipedia article]]}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
{{Article history
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:The Profit/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{talkheader}}
{{ArticleHistory
| action1 = GAN
| action1 = GAN
| action1date = December 22, 2007
| action1date = December 22, 2007
Line 14: Line 8:
| action1oldid = 177674187
| action1oldid = 177674187
| currentstatus = FGAN}}
| currentstatus = FGAN}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{notaforum|Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the [[The Profit|Wikipedia article]]}}
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}}
{{sanctions}}
{{WikiProject Scientology|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProjectBanners
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low|NRM=yes|NRMImp=Mid}}
|1 = {{Film|class=B|B-Class-1=yes|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes}}
|2 = {{WikiProject Scientology|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Low}}
|3 = {{WPReligion|class=B|importance=Low}}
|4 = {{Comedy|class=B|importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:The Profit (film)/Archive %(counter)d
}}

== Intro size ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Profit&diff=409825096&oldid=408412124 diff] = this edit by {{user|Laval}} is inappropriate. Per [[WP:LEAD]], the intro/lede should be able to function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, including every single subsection of the article. Please, do not do this again without discussion on the talk page. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
:[[WP:LEAD]] states: [[WP:LEAD|''"The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject should usually be established in the first few sentences."'']] Please make sure to adhere to this. Thanks. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


== actor credits incorrect ==
== My edit listing who the main characters were based on ==


Mr. Hunt played by Lanny Fuettere, Mrs. Hunt, his wife, not credited, played by Sandra(Sandy) Mitchell not the name listed. Thank you for correcting [[User:Mamahunt1002|Mamahunt1002]] ([[User talk:Mamahunt1002|talk]]) 22:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
My edit listing who the main characters were based on was reverted as it was "WP:OR and POV interpretations of who cast represent". I'm not sure if [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] saw the movie, but the characterizations are thinly veiled. It's not an interpretation when it is made to be super obvious. Zach Carson, for example, is based on [[Jack Parsons]]. The name is barely changed. The "[[Babalon Working]]" is now the "Caliban Working". Carson put in $20,000 instead of Parson who put in $21,000 into selling sailboats. Legend has Parsons evocating Bartzabel to summon a typhoon in retribution, in the movie Carson evoked Satan. How obvious does it have to be not to be considered POV? [[User:Chiok|Chiok]] ([[User talk:Chiok|talk]]) 02:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:Do you have a source to back up your personal interpretations into the film's plot? If not, this is your own [[WP:OR]] interpretations ''of'' the film - which does not belong in the plot section, or anywhere in the article for that matter, as it is unsourced. [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 05:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:57, 27 February 2024

Former good article nomineeThe Profit (film) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Intro size

[edit]

diff = this edit by Laval (talk · contribs) is inappropriate. Per WP:LEAD, the intro/lede should be able to function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, including every single subsection of the article. Please, do not do this again without discussion on the talk page. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD states: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject should usually be established in the first few sentences." Please make sure to adhere to this. Thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

actor credits incorrect

[edit]

Mr. Hunt played by Lanny Fuettere, Mrs. Hunt, his wife, not credited, played by Sandra(Sandy) Mitchell not the name listed. Thank you for correcting Mamahunt1002 (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]