Jump to content

Talk:Matthew Tukaki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (C/Low): Biography, +banner shell, +New Zealand, +Politics (Rater)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject New Zealand}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell |living=yes |1=
{{WikiProject banner shell |living=yes |class=C|listas=Tukaki, Matthew|1=
{{WikiProject Biography
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand |importance=Low}}
|class=C
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low}}
|living=yes
|listas=Tukaki, Matthew
}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand |class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics |class=C |importance=Low}}
}}
}}


Line 22: Line 18:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 05:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 05:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

== This guy is a fraud? ==

Can soeone that is allowed to remove this article or heavilly edit it to remove the things that have not been verified, even after several years. [[Special:Contributions/122.61.198.227|122.61.198.227]] ([[User talk:122.61.198.227|talk]]) 08:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

== Deletion proposal ==

I must object to your deletion proposal {{u|Camoronic}}. The current level of sourcing may be insufficient, but 11,000+ results on Google's news tab would indicate that he is clearly notable. Additionally, while it is entirely possible the article was written by Tukaki himself, such rationale should not be used as a reason for deletion without evidence. [[User:Pokelova|Pokelova]] ([[User talk:Pokelova|talk]]) 09:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:36, 28 February 2024

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Matthew Tukaki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is a fraud?

[edit]

Can soeone that is allowed to remove this article or heavilly edit it to remove the things that have not been verified, even after several years. 122.61.198.227 (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion proposal

[edit]

I must object to your deletion proposal Camoronic. The current level of sourcing may be insufficient, but 11,000+ results on Google's news tab would indicate that he is clearly notable. Additionally, while it is entirely possible the article was written by Tukaki himself, such rationale should not be used as a reason for deletion without evidence. Pokelova (talk) 09:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]