Vassian Patrikeyev: Difference between revisions
m →Ecclesiastic career: general fixes using AWB |
m Moving Category:People from the Grand Duchy of Moscow to Category:People from the Principality of Moscow per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2014}} |
||
{{more citations needed|date=June 2008}} |
|||
'''Vassian Patrikeyev''', also known as '''Vassian Kosoy''' (''Вассиан Патрикеев'', ''Вассиан Косой'' in |
'''Vassian Patrikeyev''', also known as '''Vassian Kosoy''' (''Вассиан Патрикеев'', ''Вассиан Косой'' in Russian; real name – [[knyaz]] ''Василий Иванович Патрикеев'', or Vasili Ivanovich Patrikeyev) (c. 1470 – between 1531 and 1545) was a bishop of [[Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast|Rostov]] and confidant of [[Ivan III of Moscow]].{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=90}} Vassian was an [[ecclesiastic]] and political figure and writer and an early member of the [[House of Golitsyn]] that traced its male-line descent to Duke [[Patrikas]] of [[Korela]] and to [[Gediminas]], [[Grand Duke of Lithuania]]. |
||
==Political action== |
==Political action== |
||
He was known to have been one of the leaders of the [[boyar |
He was known to have been one of the leaders of the [[boyar]] party, which supported tsarevich [[Dmitry Ivanovich (grandson of Ivan III)|Dmitry Ivanovich]] (grandson of [[Ivan III of Russia|Ivan III]]) in a struggle against [[Sophia Paleologue]]'s son [[Vasili III of Russia|Vasili]] for succession to the throne. |
||
In ecclesiastic matters, the boyar party was generally closer to [[heresy|heretical]] and freedom-loving circles. |
In ecclesiastic matters, the boyar party was generally closer to [[heresy|heretical]] and freedom-loving circles. |
||
Vassian wrote the "Epistle on the Ugra" (''Poslanie na Ugru''), which contains political propaganda about the so-called "[[Great Stand on the Ugra River|Stand on the Ugra]]".{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=90}} It argued that [[Batu Khan]] had plundered and enslaved the land, usurping the title of ''[[tsar]]'' without being "of a ''tsarian'' family", alleging that his descendant [[Ahmed Khan bin Küchük]] was a mere "brigand and savage and fighter-of-God", while insisting Ivan III was the only real, legitimate, Orthodox ''tsar''.{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=90}} Vassian wrote that the Tatar campaign (''nakhozhdenie'') had made the Muscovites afraid, but the Church released Ivan from any oath made to Ahmed Khan, as it was made under duress, and so he no longer owed his [[Golden Horde]] overlord any loyalty.{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=90}} The problem with this logic is that Rus' writers had traditionally translated both the Mongol title ''[[khan (title)|khan]]'' and the Greek Byzantine title ''[[basileus]]'' ("king, emperor") as ''tsar'' (originally from ''[[Caesar (title)|caesar]]''), but Vassian was arguing only Christian Orthodox monarchs such as the Byzantine ''basileus'' and the Muscovite ''[[knyaz]]'' ("prince") should be called ''tsars''.{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=91}} Therefore, Vassian resolved that he needed to elevate the prince of Moscow to the status of ''tsar'', while claiming the [[Chingisid]] khans must have been imposters, stealing the ''tsar'' title they never deserved, even though Vassian thereby rejected the [[Pauline Christianity|Pauline doctrine]] invoked in the ''[[Life of Alexander Nevsky]]'' and the [[Hagiography|''vita'']] of [[Michael of Chernigov]].{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=91}} It is the first written political attempt to deny the legitimacy of the Golden Horde's supremacy over the Rus' principalities since the [[Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus']] in 1237–1242, and also the first Muscovite attempt to portray the 1480 Stand on the Ugra as having major ideological significance.{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=91}} Literary successors of Vassian's epistle would greatly exaggerate the standoff, wherein 'the events of 1480 assume the status of pivotal moments in the history of man.'{{sfn|Halperin|1987|p=92}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Ecclesiastic career== |
==Ecclesiastic career== |
||
At the [[monastery]], Patrikeyev became a student of [[Nil Sorsky]] and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to |
At the [[monastery]], Patrikeyev became a student of [[Nil Sorsky]] and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to Moscow to attend a church council (''sobor''). During this ecclesiastic meeting, the two demanded leniency for the [[heretics]] and opposed [[Joseph Volotsky]]'s views on this issue, subsequently inflaming a dispute between the two parties in the form of personal letters. |
||
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that [[Varlaam, Metropolitan of Moscow|Varlaam]], who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected [[Metropolitan bishop]] with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev. |
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that [[Varlaam, Metropolitan of Moscow|Varlaam]], who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected [[Metropolitan bishop]] with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev. |
||
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called ''Кормчая книга'' (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see [[Canon law]]), a code of ecclesiastic [[decree]]s and laws by the [[Byzantine emperor]]s. In 1518, [[Maximus the Greek]] came from [[Mount Athos]] to take part in his work, gathering [[Opposition (politics)|opposition]]ary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev. |
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called ''Кормчая книга'' (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see [[Canon law]]), a code of ecclesiastic [[decree]]s and laws by the [[Byzantine emperor]]s. In 1518, [[Maximus the Greek]] came from [[Mount Athos]] to take part in his work, gathering [[Opposition (politics)|opposition]]ary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev. |
||
In 1523, a [[Josephinians|Josephinian]] [[hegumen]] from [[Volokolamsk]] named [[Daniel, Metropolitan of Moscow|Daniel]] was elected metropolitan. Soon after this, the church commenced [[prosecution]] of the opposition. |
In 1523, a [[Josephinians|Josephinian]] [[hegumen]] from [[Volokolamsk]] named [[Daniel, Metropolitan of Moscow|Daniel]] was elected metropolitan. Soon after this, the church commenced [[prosecution]] of the opposition. |
||
A few years later, Patrikeyev's influence began to weaken due to, among other things, his open disapproval of Vasili's divorce. In 1531, Vassian was summoned to appear before the church council as a [[defendant]]. Metropolitan Daniel accused Patrikeyev of unauthorized revision of the ''Kormchaya kniga''; insertion of [[Hellenistic]] ideas; arbitrary removal of passages which had asserted the right of the monasteries to own [[Property|patrimonies]]; revilement of miracle workers, e.g. [[Saint Makarius Kalyazinsky]] and Metropolitan [[ |
A few years later, Patrikeyev's influence began to weaken due to, among other things, his open disapproval of Vasili's divorce. In 1531, Vassian was summoned to appear before the church council as a [[defendant]]. Metropolitan Daniel accused Patrikeyev of unauthorized revision of the ''Kormchaya kniga''; insertion of [[Hellenistic]] ideas; arbitrary removal of passages which had asserted the right of the monasteries to own [[Property|patrimonies]]; revilement of miracle workers, e.g. [[Saint Makarius Kalyazinsky]] and Metropolitan [[Jonah of Moscow|Jonah]]; "heretic lines" in his translation of [[Simeon Metaphrastes]]' ''Life of [[Mary, the mother of Jesus|St. Mary]]''. The church council found Patrikeyev guilty and sent him to a hostile [[Joseph-Volokolamsk Monastery]], where he would die a decade later. |
||
Patrikeyev's date of death is uncertain. He died no later than 1545 and a violent death, if one is to believe [[Ivan the Terrible]]'s closest associate [[Andrei Kurbsky]]. |
|||
Patrikeyev’s date of death is uncertain. He died no later than 1545 and a violent death, if one is to believe [[Ivan the Terrible]]'s closest associate [[Andrei Kurbsky]]. He is not known to have left any descendants; however, there is a legend from Viipuri/Vyborg, the formerly Finnish seaport that is now in Russia, of a clandestine love affair between Patrikeyev-Kosoi and a local woman named Sigrid Toth. This would have occurred during the Swedish-Russian War of 1495-97, when Patrikeyev-Kosoi was the commander of the Russian army that invaded Swedish-controlled Finland. No mention is made of them having any children, but this is a possibility that should not be discounted. There is a DNA research project currently underway to discover the roots of the Gediminid and Rurikid dynasties - see www.familytreedna.com/public/rurikid. Since Patrikeyev-Kosoi was a Gediminid prince, this project could discover his possible male descendants, if they exist. They would probably be found in Finland today, or among people whose families were in Finland in the late 15th century. The two modern Gediminid families that would be most closely related to Patrikeyev-Kosoi are the Kurakin (Courakin) and Golitsyn (Galitzine) families. Males of these two family lines are encouraged to take the DNA test in order to help solve this mystery. And, havomg taken those testrs, these Golitsyn and Khovanski helped to reconstruct the gediminid modal profile of Y DNA. Nobody in Finland has yet been found to be close enough with that modal to be really a direct descendant. The tested "Kosonen" was not close enough. |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== Bibliography == |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Halperin|first=Charles J.|year=1987| title=Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History |pages=222 |isbn=9781850430575}} (e-book). |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. --> |
|||
| NAME = Patrikeyev, Vassian |
|||
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES = |
|||
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = |
|||
| DATE OF BIRTH = |
|||
| PLACE OF BIRTH = |
|||
| DATE OF DEATH = |
|||
| PLACE OF DEATH = |
|||
}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Patrikeyev, Vassian}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Patrikeyev, Vassian}} |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:People from the Principality of Moscow]] |
||
[[Category:Russian religious leaders]] |
[[Category:Russian religious leaders]] |
||
[[Category:Gediminids]] |
[[Category:Gediminids]] |
||
[[Category:1470s births]] |
[[Category:1470s births]] |
||
[[Category:16th-century deaths]] |
[[Category:16th-century deaths]] |
||
[[es:Vasian Patrikeyev]] |
|||
[[ru:Вассиан Патрикеев]] |
|||
[[fi:Vassian Kosoi]] |
Latest revision as of 10:27, 28 February 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2008) |
Vassian Patrikeyev, also known as Vassian Kosoy (Вассиан Патрикеев, Вассиан Косой in Russian; real name – knyaz Василий Иванович Патрикеев, or Vasili Ivanovich Patrikeyev) (c. 1470 – between 1531 and 1545) was a bishop of Rostov and confidant of Ivan III of Moscow.[1] Vassian was an ecclesiastic and political figure and writer and an early member of the House of Golitsyn that traced its male-line descent to Duke Patrikas of Korela and to Gediminas, Grand Duke of Lithuania.
Political action
[edit]He was known to have been one of the leaders of the boyar party, which supported tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich (grandson of Ivan III) in a struggle against Sophia Paleologue's son Vasili for succession to the throne.
In ecclesiastic matters, the boyar party was generally closer to heretical and freedom-loving circles.
Vassian wrote the "Epistle on the Ugra" (Poslanie na Ugru), which contains political propaganda about the so-called "Stand on the Ugra".[1] It argued that Batu Khan had plundered and enslaved the land, usurping the title of tsar without being "of a tsarian family", alleging that his descendant Ahmed Khan bin Küchük was a mere "brigand and savage and fighter-of-God", while insisting Ivan III was the only real, legitimate, Orthodox tsar.[1] Vassian wrote that the Tatar campaign (nakhozhdenie) had made the Muscovites afraid, but the Church released Ivan from any oath made to Ahmed Khan, as it was made under duress, and so he no longer owed his Golden Horde overlord any loyalty.[1] The problem with this logic is that Rus' writers had traditionally translated both the Mongol title khan and the Greek Byzantine title basileus ("king, emperor") as tsar (originally from caesar), but Vassian was arguing only Christian Orthodox monarchs such as the Byzantine basileus and the Muscovite knyaz ("prince") should be called tsars.[2] Therefore, Vassian resolved that he needed to elevate the prince of Moscow to the status of tsar, while claiming the Chingisid khans must have been imposters, stealing the tsar title they never deserved, even though Vassian thereby rejected the Pauline doctrine invoked in the Life of Alexander Nevsky and the vita of Michael of Chernigov.[2] It is the first written political attempt to deny the legitimacy of the Golden Horde's supremacy over the Rus' principalities since the Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' in 1237–1242, and also the first Muscovite attempt to portray the 1480 Stand on the Ugra as having major ideological significance.[2] Literary successors of Vassian's epistle would greatly exaggerate the standoff, wherein 'the events of 1480 assume the status of pivotal moments in the history of man.'[3]
In 1499, Ivan III found out about the conspiracy against Vasili and ordered arrests (the tsar first favored Dmitry Ivanovich). Vassian Patrikeyev was forced to take monastic vows and sent to Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery.
Ecclesiastic career
[edit]At the monastery, Patrikeyev became a student of Nil Sorsky and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to Moscow to attend a church council (sobor). During this ecclesiastic meeting, the two demanded leniency for the heretics and opposed Joseph Volotsky's views on this issue, subsequently inflaming a dispute between the two parties in the form of personal letters.
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that Varlaam, who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected Metropolitan bishop with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev.
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called Кормчая книга (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see Canon law), a code of ecclesiastic decrees and laws by the Byzantine emperors. In 1518, Maximus the Greek came from Mount Athos to take part in his work, gathering oppositionary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev.
In 1523, a Josephinian hegumen from Volokolamsk named Daniel was elected metropolitan. Soon after this, the church commenced prosecution of the opposition.
A few years later, Patrikeyev's influence began to weaken due to, among other things, his open disapproval of Vasili's divorce. In 1531, Vassian was summoned to appear before the church council as a defendant. Metropolitan Daniel accused Patrikeyev of unauthorized revision of the Kormchaya kniga; insertion of Hellenistic ideas; arbitrary removal of passages which had asserted the right of the monasteries to own patrimonies; revilement of miracle workers, e.g. Saint Makarius Kalyazinsky and Metropolitan Jonah; "heretic lines" in his translation of Simeon Metaphrastes' Life of St. Mary. The church council found Patrikeyev guilty and sent him to a hostile Joseph-Volokolamsk Monastery, where he would die a decade later.
Patrikeyev's date of death is uncertain. He died no later than 1545 and a violent death, if one is to believe Ivan the Terrible's closest associate Andrei Kurbsky.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Halperin 1987, p. 90.
- ^ a b c Halperin 1987, p. 91.
- ^ Halperin 1987, p. 92.
Bibliography
[edit]- Halperin, Charles J. (1987). Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History. p. 222. ISBN 9781850430575. (e-book).