Jump to content

Talk:Malvern Link railway station: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{TrainsWikiProject}}'
 
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layout
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{TrainsWikiProject}}
{{WikiProject Trains|importance=low|refimprove=yes|UK=yes|UK-importance=low|stations=yes}}
{{WikiProject Worcestershire|importance = Low}}
}}

== Coordinate error ==

{{tlc|geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Malvern Link 52.12581,-2.31955 — [[Special:Contributions/90.192.9.117|90.192.9.117]] ([[User talk:90.192.9.117|talk]]) 20:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:{{fixed}} — [[User:TransporterMan|'''<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:small; color:blue;">T<span style="font-size:x-small;">RANSPORTER</span>M<span style="font-size:x-small;">AN</span></span>''']] ([[User talk:TransporterMan#top|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:x-small;">TALK</span>]]) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

== PROD ==

I came here because this article had been flagged in a project page as the subject of a PROD. Many much less significant stations have articles, also many defunct ones. There is thus no reason for not retaining this one. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 15:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
:My main difficulty with the article is with the form of the succession box, which implies that there are two lines through the station, whereas there is only one line but used by two services. Since this is set up from a special "rail line" template rather than the standard "s-start" series, I do not know how to rectify this. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 15:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
::(a) all railway stations in Great Britain which are open should have their own articles (even one-train-a-week stations like {{stnlnk|Denton}}), so the PROD was unjustified; (b) {{tlx|rail line two routes}}. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 15:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Malvern Link railway station]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/820377472|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130707074106/http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/transport-and-highways/transport-schemes/worcester-transport-strategy/malvern-link-station.aspx to http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/transport-and-highways/transport-schemes/worcester-transport-strategy/malvern-link-station.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=true|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 11:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:11, 29 February 2024

Coordinate error

[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Malvern Link 52.12581,-2.31955 — 90.192.9.117 (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 FixedTRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

[edit]

I came here because this article had been flagged in a project page as the subject of a PROD. Many much less significant stations have articles, also many defunct ones. There is thus no reason for not retaining this one. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My main difficulty with the article is with the form of the succession box, which implies that there are two lines through the station, whereas there is only one line but used by two services. Since this is set up from a special "rail line" template rather than the standard "s-start" series, I do not know how to rectify this. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(a) all railway stations in Great Britain which are open should have their own articles (even one-train-a-week stations like Denton), so the PROD was unjustified; (b) {{rail line two routes}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malvern Link railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]