Jump to content

Talk:Willesden Jewish Cemetery: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MilHistBot (talk | contribs)
Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 11 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 10 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Architecture}}, {{WikiProject Death}}, {{WikiProject Cemeteries}}, {{WikiProject Historic sites}}, {{WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening}}, {{WikiProject Jewish history}}, {{WikiProject Judaism}}, {{WikiProject London}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}, {{WikiProject Women's history}}.
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Architecture| class= | importance= }}
{{WikiProject Architecture| importance= }}
{{WikiProject Death|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Historic sites |class=start |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Cemeteries |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Jewish history| class= start | importance= low }}
{{WikiProject Historic sites |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Judaism| class= start | importance= low }}
{{WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject London| class= start | importance= low }}
{{WikiProject Jewish history| importance= low }}
{{WikiProject Judaism| importance= low }}
{{WikiProject London| importance= low }}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist -->
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist -->
|British=y |Memorials=y}}
|British=y |Memorials=y}}
{{WikiProject Visual arts|public-art=yes}}
{{WikiProject Women's History| importance= }}
}}
}}
{{copied|from=Willesden Jewish Cemetery|to=List of people buried at Willesden Jewish Cemetery}}
{{Failed GA|04:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)|page=1|topic=Art and architecture}}

== FindAGrave—cannot be used as a source ==

{{re|Headhitter}} FindAGrave is a user-generated, unreliable source. Please see [[WP:RSP]]. <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">[[User:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">b</b>]][[User talk:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">uidh</b>]][[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|<b style="color: White">e</b>]]</span> 08:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
:[[User:Buidhe|Buidhe]]: Thanks for alerting me. I've now removed all the FindAGrave references. Best wishes [[User:Headhitter|Headhitter]] ([[User talk:Headhitter|talk]]) 11:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Talk:Willesden Jewish Cemetery/GA1}}

Latest revision as of 05:17, 29 February 2024

FindAGrave—cannot be used as a source

[edit]

@Headhitter: FindAGrave is a user-generated, unreliable source. Please see WP:RSP. buidhe 08:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe: Thanks for alerting me. I've now removed all the FindAGrave references. Best wishes Headhitter (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Willesden Jewish Cemetery/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 04:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: Since this article is organized as a list, not a prose article (per discussion at WT:GAN), it is not eligible for consideration as a GA article. If there is significantly more prose that could be written on the cemetery, you could split into an article on the cemetery and a list of burials, but in either case the article would have to go through significant changes before being eligible for GAN. buidhe 04:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Buidhe. What would the significant changes be? Headhitter (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Headhitter, Well, right now with a bit better sourcing it could be submitted to FLC. Alternately, if there were significantly more about the cemetery itself—I mean at least a few sections worth—it would make sense to split the article, just like we have Arlington National Cemetery and List of burials at Arlington National Cemetery. However, this is not a major cemetery so I'm not sure there's enough to say that it would be worth splitting. buidhe 18:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe, my concern would be that if the existing article were split into two, or if it were to become a list rather than an article, it would then be out of kilter with similar articles for London cemeteries. I'm not aware of other London cemeteries, and particularly Jewish ones, where this has been done. Headhitter (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Headhitter, Well, if articles like Brady Street Cemetery or Golders Green Jewish Cemetery were further developed with details about the people who were buried there, they would probably turn into lists. buidhe 19:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]