Talk:Robert Wishart: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Rcpaterson (talk | contribs) Guardians and Queens |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject Catholicism}}, {{WikiProject Medieval Scotland}}. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6. Tag: |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|living=no|listas=Wishart, Robert|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Catholicism|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Medieval Scotland|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age. The amendment on this point is therefore misleading. I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment. Thereafter it will stand as justification. |
I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age. The amendment on this point is therefore misleading. I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment. Thereafter it will stand as justification. |
||
[[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I'm sure you're right (unless, speculating, Bek had been appointed Regent by her father-in-law-to-be). Still, Wishart would surely have been on the regency council. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I have now made what I think is a neutral, and open-ended, amendment. |
|||
[[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 21:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:20, 29 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guardians and Queens
[edit]I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age. The amendment on this point is therefore misleading. I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment. Thereafter it will stand as justification. Rcpaterson 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sure you're right (unless, speculating, Bek had been appointed Regent by her father-in-law-to-be). Still, Wishart would surely have been on the regency council. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I have now made what I think is a neutral, and open-ended, amendment. Rcpaterson 21:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Medieval Scotland articles
- Low-importance Medieval Scotland articles