Jump to content

Talk:Rust in Peace: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{GA nominee|02:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Bruce Campbell|Bruce Campbell]] ([[User talk:Bruce Campbell|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Albums|status=|note=}}

{{ArticleHistory
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1=GAN
Line 6: Line 5:
|action1result=not listed
|action1result=not listed
|action1oldid=142770778
|action1oldid=142770778
|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=music
}}
{{Album|importance=high|class=b}}
{{HMM|importance=high|class=b}}


|action2=GAN
== "Holy Wars" ==
|action2date=24 August 2014
In all actuality the song begins with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and then briefly shifts to the Northern Ireland conflict before transferring to the Punisher story. --[[User:BlueGlowGuardian|BlueGlowGuardian]] 03:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
|action2result=listed
|action2link=Talk:Rust in Peace/GA1
|action2oldid=622446847


|action3=GTC
|action3date=02:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Megadeth studio albums/archive1
|action3result=promoted


|action4=GTR
"Holy Wars" was written about the N. Ireland conflict, not Israel
|action4date=19:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Megadeth studio albums/archive1
|action4result=removed


|currentstatus=GA
The link at the bottom of the page, where there's a demonstration of how to play the holy wars riff, who ever put it there has some issues. the guy playing the riff is making some serious mistakes in the opening riff, and in the subsequent main riff that follows. either put in another, more appropriate demonstration, or take it off entirely. PLEASE! [[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 20:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
|topic=music

}}
I agree. The demonstration of 'Holy Wars' is just totally wrong, it's like the guy has never even heard the song!!! Also, the lyrics to 'Holy Wars' mention Israel: 'Don't look now to Israel, it might be your homeland'.
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=

{{WikiProject Albums}}
** Ok, I removed this link. It was an eyesore (more like an Earsore) and horridly wrong. [[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 09:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Metal}}

}}
Have you people ever even seen the music video for Holy Wars?? It is so clearly in the desert you would have to be on drugs to think its anywhere else. It is definatly about the Palestinian conflict with Israel, and nothing else. I am inclined to say that interview is just low-grade crap that is probably made up with a real Mustaine interview mixed in. Although, really anything is possible, cause why would someone try to glorify the IRA. The IRA are well.......this shouldn't be the page to discuss it on.
-8/09 RATTMAN28

* have you even listened to the song? it does nothing of the sort! and the video has shots from the desert, yes. but also of dave skydiving. and news reels from around the world. and the band playing in a hangar without any shirts on. stop reading too much into things like Video clips. Dave mustaine was in Northern Ireland to preform with megadeth, and heard people are bootlegging megadeth T-Shirts for "the Cause". here's an excerpt from the interview (the song he preformed was Anarchy, btw):
<blockquote>Q: DO YOU EVER REGRET SAYING THINGS YOU SHOULDN'T? LIKE THAT TIME IN NORTHERN IRELAND YOU DEDICATED A SONG TO THE IRA?
Dave:"You know what? I don't regret that at all! Someone else told me what was going on and I was just repeating what I'd been told. All I knew was the way the guy explained it to me. I was backstage drinking Guinness - and remember I'm used to American beer - I've had a few of them and they're bootlegging T-shirts outside so I say, 'You've gotta stop that!'. The guy goes, 'Oh, that's for The Cause'. So I say, 'What's The Cause?'. This is how simply he explained it: he said The Cause is about prejudiced religion. The Catholics and the Protestants are fighting and one religion thinks it's better than the other religion. And I went, 'Well that's fucking stupid!'. By then we'd had some pot and vodka and probably a little blow and I went up onstage and when we played 'Anarchy [In The UK]' I said, This one's for The Cause!'. I woke up the next day in Dublin and no-one would talk to me! People were like, 'Don't you know what you did last night? We were taken out of town in a bulletproof bus!'. I had remorse for the fighting among the kids at the show, but I don't regret what I said."
</blockquote>

yea i read that crap on that link, and its probably crap. I mean the thing is supposed to be translated from spanish (it says so on the bottom of it), and its about northern ireland, i mean come on its probably just BS. I think it should just be deleted altogether, the supposed contradictions i mean. Where did you even find that thing anyway?? And dude, with lyrics in the song about israel and the desert and everything...just stop trying to fool everyone into thinking this glorification about northern ireland's IRA is from Dave Mustaine. And some other fundamental points about it having nothing to do with the IRA.

Brother will kill brother
Spilling blood across the land
Killing for religion
Something I don't understand

Fools like me, who cross the sea
And come to foreign lands
Ask the sheep, for their beliefs
Do you kill on God's command?

A country that's divided
Surely will not stand
My past erased, no more disgrace
No foolish naive stand

The end is near, it's crystal clear
Part of the master plan
Don't look now to Israel
It might be in your homelands

Holy wars

Ok so theres the lyrics. Hmm, Killing for Religion? A, if i recall correctly, the IRA is trying to unite Ireland, regardless of being Protestant or Catholic. So how the hell could it possibly make sense to be about the IRA?? Well I think im just going to delete that section, its obviously BS, and if you dont see it oh well...

**<blockquote>However though, this interview seems to make huge contradictions to the music video. The music video for Holy Wars clearly shows conflict in the desert. Also the people in it seem to appear to be much more middle eastern in appearence, and nothing like anyone from Northern Ireland or from the British Isles either. Also there is a distinctly Middle Eastern sounding lead line seperating Holy Wars and the Punishment due.</blockquote>when people start making their own thesis for what the video means, it turns around to bite them. infact, if you watch the video, it also features the band in an airplane hangar, so the song must also refer to people who work in hangars, right? besides, saying that the solo carries middle-eastern influence, thus deducting that the song is about Israel is more than childish. I happen to be an israeli, and I've read countless articles about this song, all pertaining to the Northern Ireland dispute, all denouncing that Israel has anything to do with the song, other than what mustaine wrote: "Don't look now to Israel, It might be your homeland". granted, Dave's lyric writing can be fairly complex at times, but this is as simple as it goes. this song can be reflected through so many conflicts, and yet the man himself said, in his words, what this song was orignally written about. using creative liscence on other peoples Ideas, no matter how "middle-eastern" the video looks (and actually, it also has some images from cambodia, korea, soldiers training et al), is really grating. this paragraph needs some editing, IMO.[[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 07:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Dude, just forget about that stupid article, its obviously CRAP as mentioned above, and it really just doesn't belong as a source on wikipedia. and don't give me that bs about u being israeli, don't try to get people to think your one just to benefit your argument, that's weak dude. Your probably some Irish kid if anything trying to glorify the IRA's now defunct cause. Enough is enough, just forget about that stupid link and the bs spanish article from a really really piss poor source. and also, they were if anything, just putting war violence in the video to help exhibit the theme of the video. and when is the band in an airplane hangar? I really doubt u have seen the video more than once like ten years ago. they are jumping out of the plane on that headbangers ball megadeth special. and the solo more than anything sounds close to a mid east influence, marty would know how to pull that off easy. but to say its childish? wtf r u on? you would have to be an idiot to think this video isnt about the Arab Israeli conflict.

I bet who ever stuck that fake article in here is enjoying a good laugh watching you defending it, cause anyone with half a brain and with any prior knowledge to Megadeth will know that it was without any doubt is about the Arab Israeli Conflict. The consencous is that your wrong and that most of the people who have contributed to the discussion believe that it has nothing to do with Ireland.

THE SONG HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH NORTHERN IRELAND, END OF STORY DAMMIT!!!!

AND STOP REVERTING IT, IT ISNT ARGUABLE!!!

::So now you think I'm Irish. glorious deduction skills. wow. why would I defend Israel to promote Ireland, prey tell, you imbecile? [[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 09:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

:I think that considering that many people disagree, it's fair to leave a note in parentheses saying that one could interpret it as being about Northern Ireland. I don't think it is, and if we leave it that way, the article doesn't say so either, but simply mentions that some people see it that way. [[User:Saintamh|Saintamh]] 09:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

::dude its quite obvious that that interview is garbage, and if you would ever bother to get off ur ass and watch the music video or read the lyrics you can tell that the goddamn IRA has absolutly nothing to do with the song. like seriously, before you go revert my edit again, go watch the video and read the lyrics, and then if you can that is, give me a decent argument as to how this song has anything to do with that. dont give me some bullshit about how it needs to be included. i mean if thats ur argument, we might as well say that it is also arguable that the holocaust never happened, and of course it isnt. so stop reverting this, your dead wrong, and it is completely unarguable, ur just acting like some raging asshole by doing this and messing with average joe smith that comes across that and reads it. i refuse to let every joe smith think that northern ireland is part of that song, mustaine never wrote anything about it, so forget this already.


==Background information==
:::You didn't get my point. I ''have'' watched the video, I ''have'' read the lyrics, I ''don't'' believe it has anything to do with the IRA. I don't believe holocaust deniers either, but I still think it's appropriate for Wikipedia to have [[Holocaust denial|an article]] about their theories, since there are apparently many people who believe them. Anyway, I'm not going to get into an argument over the meaning of the lyrics of a Megadeth song. I'm not going to revert your latest edit. [[User:Saintamh|Saintamh]] 15:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey [[User:L1A1 FAL|L1A1 FAL]], while tightening up the Megadeth article, I've omitted the information in the blockquote bellow because I considered it trivial for the main page. What do you think, should we add it here?


<blockquote>In 1987 and 88 the band had just spent several months on tour with [[Savatage]]. Mustaine was a long time fan of their lead guitarist [[Criss Oliva]]. After supporting [[Ronnie James Dio]] on tour with Savatage, Mustaine hired Criss's best friend and long-time guitar tech Dan Campbell for the "So Far So Good So What" tours as his personal guitar tech. Mustaine had mentioned to Campbell that he would like to speak to Oliva about the lead guitar position so Campbell called Oliva and Mustaine offered him the position. Oliva seriously considered the move but declined and remained in Savatage.</blockquote>
You know, I came back to read this argument and realized something. you obviously know everything to know about megadeth, so an article quoting Dave Mustaine is Probably CRAP! Ok. any other bright deductions congugating the C.R.A.P. Verb, or would you like to contribute somthing a little more condusive and back your argument with somthing other than "oh yeah, I read that article and it's obviously crap, since I don't believe it, so it's crap. you don't think the same way I do, so what you're thinking is crap!".
sigh.
I Agree with Saintamh about having the disputed point in the article put out so people can have their own opinions voiced here. after all, Wiki is not about what YOU think is right, or I think is right, when it comes to intangible song meanings like this one. oh, just for kicks, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict takes place in places other than the desert, so your point of the video showing people in the desert obviously making it Israel is MOOT. if you knew half a thing about israel, you'd know that most if not all palestinians DONT LIVE IN THE DESERT! hell, Gaza is maybe near Egypt, but last time I checked, it's pretty green there. oh, one other thing, learn how to sign your effing username. at least stand behind your posts.[[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 08:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


Additionally, I've managed to found some excerpts of Mustaine's biography at [http://www.harpercollins.com/browseinside/index.aspx?isbn13=9780061714375 HarperCollins Publishers], in which he elaborates the themes of a few songs from this album (hint: chapter 13, page 230; "Tornado of Souls" is explained on p. 218). While going through the composition and lyrics, I've noticed that not all songs were covered, so I thought to offer some help.
== Vocals for Rust In Peace/Polaris ==
I picked up the remaster of ''Rust in Peace'' a few days ago, and I am seriously wondering if the vocals for "Rust In Peace...Polaris" are the original vocals or not. I knew beforehand about the issues with the other songs that Dave had to re-work, but when I listen to the remastered RIP/P, there are nuances to the enunciations and pacing that I don't remember hearing in the original release. Did Dave have to do some tinkering with this song as well as the others, or did the re-master do such a good job of cleaning up his vocal track that it makes it sound brand new? [[User:Willbyr|Willbyr]] 18:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
* I think I read somewhere that dave mentioned that when he came to the studio to remaster "rip", he found out that all the vocal tracks and some of the guitar tracks are gone, so he had to redo them all over again. hence the changes in pace and intonations. [[User:LyTe|LyTe]] 20:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


And one last note, can we reduce the quote about how Mustaine invented the album's title? Seems kinda too long, and the last two sentences are not needed, I believe.--[[User:Вик Ретлхед|Вик Ретлхед]] ([[User talk:Вик Ретлхед|talk]]) 10:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


:As for the Megadeth main article stuff, doesn't directly relate to this album.


:I'll have to take a look through the biography then when I get a chance. I read it before for some stuff, but I was working on the TWNAH page at that time, so that's what I was looking for then.
yeah i read somewhere in an interview that holy wars is about n ireland, the less obvious choice sort of. but anyway classic song


:As for the quote about the album title, either I can take a look at it and trim/paraphrase, or, if you prefer, you could.
also if you want really detailed info about the making of this album , the remastered version from 2004 has tons of info. he says the name "rust in peace" came from a bumper sticker that he saw that said "may all your nuclear weapons rust in peace"


:Thanks for pointing that stuff out!--[[User:L1A1 FAL|L1A1 FAL]] ([[User talk:L1A1 FAL|talk]]) 19:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


{{Talk:Rust in Peace/GA1}}
my other thing is, this sounds weird but maybe there could be like a list of 10 totally essential thrash metal cds. that would be a cool wiki page.


== GA congrats ==
==Links to pages with song lyrics==
Is it permissible to post links to pages with song lyrics? [[User:Willbyr|Willbyr]] ([[User_talk:Willbyr|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Willbyr|contribs]]) 02:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
:Not if they're copyright violations (most online sources are). If they're listed on megadeth.com or some official site, that might be okay. -- ''[[User:Nae'blis|nae]]'[[User_talk:Nae'blis|blis]]'' 19:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
:: well they're all on megadeth.com [http://www.megadeth.com/discography.php?era_id=4|1][[User:AnarcistPig|Д narchistPig]] ([[User talk:AnarcistPig|talk]]) 00:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


Good work, all. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 21:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
==Perspective==


== External links modified ==
"Along with Metallica's Master of Puppets and Slayer's Reign in Blood, Rust in Peace is one of the most critically lauded thrash metal albums. Many Megadeth fans consider it to represent the high-point in the band's career."


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
This paragraph needs to have 'Rust in Peace' replaced by 'Peace Sells' and be moved to that article. ;) I know of no one (other than the author) who would mention Rust in Peace in the same breath as Master of Puppets and Reign in Blood. Rust is mostly excellent, but it doesn't exist on the same plane. However 'many' fans would say that, they are not the majority and *most* fans would say "If it isn't even Megadeth's best/most important album, it can't possibly be one of the very best of all time."


I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Rust in Peace]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=713141602 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
And even if one argued Rust was somehow better in intrinsic quality, it's like saying "Along with the Me109 and Spitfire, the F-16 is one of the most critically lauded fighter planes." One of these things is not like the others and 'P-51' is obviously what goes there.
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/song-stories/holy-wars-the-punishment-due-megadeth
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kerrang.com/wheretostartwith/artists/megadeth


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
-[[User:74.227.120.32|74.227.120.32]] 18:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
The album does represent Megadeth at their peak from this Metallica/Megadeth fan's point of view. For me Metallica didn't peak at Puppets anyway, they peaked at Justice. Both RIP and Justice are each band's respective show-off albums, unparalelled in complexity and skill (and therefore, in my opinion, the best).--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] 01:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 05:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, i am the one who wrote that line bout rust in peace being along with master of puppets and reign of blood. what i said was that it was one of the most critically lauded thrash metal releases, while peace sells was a great album, most reviewers place rust in peace on top mainly due to the musical virtuosity on rip thats lacking in peace sells. If you take a look around at reviewers like allmusic and so on rip is usually named as one of the finest thrash metal albums, and most metal sites rank it that way too. i am not going to revert the article as it previously was as i do not want to start an edit war, however the majority of critical opinion will place rip along with reign in blood and master of puppets together. been an awfully long reply, so anyone who wants to continue the discussion is welcome.(RIP)
:I'd have to agree. They are considered the big 3 albums of the big 3 American thrash metal bands.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] 00:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
==Dawn Patrol==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
There is some guitar work in Dawn Patrol, it's just not very prominent.


I have just modified 7 external links on [[Rust in Peace]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/813939872|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
:I don't think so.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] 01:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100223210701/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/hit_the_lights/david_ellefson_on_recording_new_megadeth_album_thats_the_plan.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/interviews/hit_the_lights/david_ellefson_on_recording_new_megadeth_album_thats_the_plan.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111154300/http://www.ign.com/articles/2007/01/20/top-25-metal-albums?page=6 to http://music.ign.com/articles/755/755929p6.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310180705/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=134010 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=134010
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100510104757/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=136151 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=136151
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606090022/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=137695 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=137695
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100726103108/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142010 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142010
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626051113/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS to https://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS&artist=Megadeth&format=ALBUM&go=Search&perPage=50


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
:Actually, yes there is, just listen to the final riff of the song, when it ends (also sometime during the middle of the song). [[User:Danorama|Dan]] 18:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
::That riff is only on the remastered version, [[User:M2K 2|Doppelganger]] 19:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 01:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
== Revamping article. ==


== World Leaders Labeling ==
I am going to be working on the article extensively. I've been adding sources and new sections. My goal is to get this article to Good Article status. [[User:M2K 2|Doppelganger]] 01:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


This question may seem really picky, but why did the author choose to identify the world leaders on the cover artwork from right to left? The more common method is left to right. While this method works here, as a semi-professional Tech Writer I'm just curious when I see something like this. Any information or background is appreciated, thanks. Cheers! [[User:FiggazWithAttitude|FiggazWithAttitude]] ([[User talk:FiggazWithAttitude|talk]]) 20:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
:Looks good, but there are a lot of references to [http://megadeth.rockmetal.art.pl http://megadeth.rockmetal.art.pl] now, which seems to be a fan site (?), whose material isn't that reliable. [[User:Grinder0-0|Grinder0-0]] 14:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


:{{done}} – listed them left to right. [[User:Mac Dreamstate|Mac Dreamstate]] ([[User talk:Mac Dreamstate|talk]]) 15:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
::I understand, I've been trying to find more sources. Most of the sources I found on the [[Megadeth]] article. [[User:M2K 2|Doppelganger]] 23:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


== Tornado of Souls ==
==Failed GA nomination==
GA nomination quick-failed due to lack of citations, presence of a 'citation needed' tag, and improper formatting of existing citations. Didn't proceed to evaluate further. Perhaps try a [[WP:PR|Peer Review]]. [[User:Carson_Lam|Carson]] 23:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


It seems that many fans regard Marty Friedman's solo on "Tornado" as one of the best, if not *the* best metal solo of all times, and also one of the hardest to play. Don't know if this is worth mentioning in the article. I find information like this interesting. Would need some sources to back it up of course. Here's where I came across it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4WD015wDCM --[[User:BjKa|BjKa]] ([[User talk:BjKa|talk]]) 08:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
== Heavy metal?? ==
How can you class this album as heavy metal as well as thrash, its basically saying this album is similar in sound to [[United Abominations]] and [[The System Has Failed]] when it isn't. Like [[Peace Sells... but Who's Buying?]] Rust In Peace is a thrash album, so just thrash metal on its own accurately sums up the album as a whole.[[Special:Contributions/86.150.228.35|86.150.228.35]] ([[User talk:86.150.228.35|talk]]) 16:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
:The consensus of other editors is ti have it remain in the article. [[User:156.34.142.110|The Real Libs]]-[[User talk:Wiki libs|speak politely]] 16:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
::Please show me that discussion. It's nowhere close heavy/thrash metal. [[Special:Contributions/78.62.114.241|78.62.114.241]] ([[User talk:78.62.114.241|talk]]) 09:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


== John Major? ==
this album is pure thrash <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Littlecheeze502|Littlecheeze502]] ([[User talk:Littlecheeze502|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Littlecheeze502|contribs]]) 08:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I could accept the drawing on the cover looking nothing like him, but there's a logic problem with the information given in the citation. The relevant Q&A from Megadeth's official site says it's Major because he was Prime Minister of the UK at the time... except he wasn't. Rust in Peace was released in September 1990 while Margaret Thatcher was still PM. Granted her position was looking unstable, but she wasn't challenged and replaced until November of that year, two months ''after'' the album's release. And Major wasn't even confirmed to be a contender until after the first ballot, so there was no reason in September to assume he'd become PM any time soon. Now the Q&A is from almost 17 years after the fact (going by the 09.02.07 timestamp), so whoever was writing the answer perhaps just misremembered or was given faulty information? Are there any quotes from closer to the time about the artwork? I could accept that after the big two, Bush and Gorachev, the other three were just generic men-in-suits, but if they're supposed to be real people, then I have no idea who the guy on the left is meant to be. It looks like Doctor Smith from Lost in Space to me. :D [[User:Analog Kid|Analog Kid]] ([[User talk:Analog Kid|talk]]) 18:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
== Take No Prisoners ==
Is this song really about prisoners of war, as stated here? I thought it was about US Army Veterans being more or less abandonded by the government when they came back from the war. --[[User:Fiskpinne|Fiskpinne]] ([[User talk:Fiskpinne|talk]]) 09:15, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


:Yeah, I'm still not entirely convinced by that source. And indeed chronologically it makes little sense that it would be Major. Surely [[Ed Repka]] himself would know? [[User:Mac Dreamstate|Mac Dreamstate]] ([[User talk:Mac Dreamstate|talk]]) 18:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
== Progressive Metal ==
::Greetings,
::I remember this from the time the album came out, Margaret Thatcher was on her way out, and there were strong rumors that Michael Heseltine was poised to step in as PM. The artist therefore added Heseltine to this artwork, but the gamble did not work out since John Major turned out to be the next PM. I have edited the article but came here because there was a "dubious" flag and wanted to clarify this further. [[User:EternityofNight|EternityofNight]] ([[User talk:EternityofNight|talk]]) 01:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


:::Do you have a source which quotes the artist, [[Ed Repka]]? Without one, all of that is [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[User:Mac Dreamstate|Mac Dreamstate]] ([[User talk:Mac Dreamstate|talk]]) 11:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't the genre 'progressive metal' be added to the genres of this album? This album has one of the most progressive musical arrangements in megadeth's discography and is pretty typical for a thrash metal album with guitar solos featured on and off and dense musical passages. Some of the most notable songs would be, holy wars, hangar 18, five magics and a few others.
::::I've reverted back to "an unidentified British representative" as there is no source to say ''who'' the British politician is supposed to be - and it looks nothing like Major, Heseltine, or indeed any other high-ranking british politician of the time. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 15:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
There are some references to this too. AllMusic called it megadeth's strongest musical effort. I believe that this album should be labelled as progressive metal along with thrash metal. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.245.179.32|121.245.179.32]] ([[User talk:121.245.179.32|talk]]) 14:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::It is definitely Michael Heseltine, and looks exactly like him. [[User:EternityofNight|EternityofNight]] ([[User talk:EternityofNight|talk]]) 00:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
::::::Me arse it does. [[User:Mac Dreamstate|Mac Dreamstate]] ([[User talk:Mac Dreamstate|talk]]) 00:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
::::::Looks as much like Prince Phillip circa 1990 as it does Heseltine. [[User:Rebounds12|Rebounds12]] ([[User talk:Rebounds12|talk]]) 21:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


== Proposal: Unmerge Tornado of Souls ==
== New propose ==
Why don't someone write a page about the third song Take No Prisoners. It's one of those songs that must have their own page because of it's great legacy. And beside it rocks.--[[Special:Contributions/95.156.10.43|95.156.10.43]] ([[User talk:95.156.10.43|talk]]) 19:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


:I don't know that its legacy is distinct from the album as a whole, certainly not on the same level as "Holy Wars..." or "Hangar 18". And while I do like the song, "it rocks" is not a suitable reason to create a page on the song. If you have reliable sources to cite for such an article, then we can talk. Until such a time, I think this article is sufficient.--[[User:L1A1 FAL|L1A1 FAL]] ([[User talk:L1A1 FAL|talk]]) 19:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Why was “Tornado of Souls” ever merged? It has one of the most famous solos in all of Metal history. Also, the song’s meaning has been misinterpreted as Dave wanting to murder is his girlfriend, when it’s actually about how Dave was feeling after the end of a toxic relationship. This song should have its own article. [[User:KevinML|KevinML]] ([[User talk:KevinML|talk]]) 02:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:57, 2 March 2024

Good articleRust in Peace has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 5, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
August 24, 2014Good article nomineeListed
May 15, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
February 8, 2023Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Background information

[edit]

Hey L1A1 FAL, while tightening up the Megadeth article, I've omitted the information in the blockquote bellow because I considered it trivial for the main page. What do you think, should we add it here?

In 1987 and 88 the band had just spent several months on tour with Savatage. Mustaine was a long time fan of their lead guitarist Criss Oliva. After supporting Ronnie James Dio on tour with Savatage, Mustaine hired Criss's best friend and long-time guitar tech Dan Campbell for the "So Far So Good So What" tours as his personal guitar tech. Mustaine had mentioned to Campbell that he would like to speak to Oliva about the lead guitar position so Campbell called Oliva and Mustaine offered him the position. Oliva seriously considered the move but declined and remained in Savatage.

Additionally, I've managed to found some excerpts of Mustaine's biography at HarperCollins Publishers, in which he elaborates the themes of a few songs from this album (hint: chapter 13, page 230; "Tornado of Souls" is explained on p. 218). While going through the composition and lyrics, I've noticed that not all songs were covered, so I thought to offer some help.

And one last note, can we reduce the quote about how Mustaine invented the album's title? Seems kinda too long, and the last two sentences are not needed, I believe.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 10:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As for the Megadeth main article stuff, doesn't directly relate to this album.
I'll have to take a look through the biography then when I get a chance. I read it before for some stuff, but I was working on the TWNAH page at that time, so that's what I was looking for then.
As for the quote about the album title, either I can take a look at it and trim/paraphrase, or, if you prefer, you could.
Thanks for pointing that stuff out!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rust in Peace/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA (talk · contribs) 18:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Doing...

  • Sorry for the delay, I've been a bit busy lately. I'll have the review up very soon. For now, look for ways you can transition some sentences better. For example, It was released on September 24, 1990 by Capitol Records. The album was produced by Mike Clink. Rust in Peace is the first album to feature guitarist Marty Friedman and drummer Nick Menza, following the departure of Jeff Young and Chuck Behler in 1989. -- these could easily be combined into two sentences: It was released on September 24, 1990 by Capitol Records and produced by Mike Clink. Following the departure of Jeff Young and Chuck Behler in 1989, Rust in Peace is the first Megadeth album to feature guitarist Marty Friedman and drummer Nick Menza.
  • IMO, I think the article may look better if the article layout changed from

3 Release
4 Critical reception
4.1 Retrospect
5 Legacy

to

3 Release and reception
3.1 Critical response
3.2 Retrospect
3.3 Legacy

Generally, on many of the Megadeth articles, "Critical reception" is separate from release. I could see "Legacy" going under that though possibly. I merged the single "Release" paragraph with the "Background", since "Release" was a single paragraph--L1A1 FAL (talk) 10:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update I reversed myself here. On second thought, I decided that "Release" goes better with ""Reception", as you suggested. I believe "Legacy" should be separate though, at least at this time--L1A1 FAL (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several dead/broken links need to be repaired. [1]
In Progress... Fixed or replaced a few of the dead ones.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update All links listed in red and yellow on the checklinks page have been fixed, removed or replaced. What do the green ones mean though, I'm not certain about what that means?--L1A1 FAL (talk) 05:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]
  • I think this section should be renamed "Concept" because it talks about the background, title, artwork, recording, and mixing.
I believe "Background and recording" sounds better. "Concept" sounds like something that would describe the lyrical meaning--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...alongside Iron Maiden, Kiss, Helloween, Guns N' Roses, and David Lee Roth, performing to an audience of more than 100,000 people.[1] The band was soon added to the "Monsters of Rock" European tour... this could be arranged to read better. Something like: ...alongside Iron Maiden, Kiss, Helloween, Guns N' Roses, and David Lee Roth. The band performed to an audience of more than 100,000 people, and they were soon added to the "Monsters of Rock" European tour...
Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 05:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...Due to further issues within the band, Dave Mustaine fired both drummer... take out "Due to" and reword to: Further issues within the band caused Dave Mustaine to fire both drummer...
Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 05:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...guitarist Jeff Young, and canceled their scheduled 1988 Australian tour... instead of "and canceled their scheduled" go with resulting in the cancellation of their...
  • The search for a new guitarist was a drawn out process. Mustaine examined... instead of a period, I would connect these sentences with a semi-colon.
Addressed--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...had sent him a CD, Dragon's Kiss. Upon listening to the CD, Mustaine had... don't use CD twice, rather say recordings, disc, record, etc.
Addressed--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mustaine declared that "we really didn’t make... sounds a bit weird, change to Mustaine declared that they "really didn’t make...
Addressed--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]
  • Inconsistency with the capitalization of "The Cause"/"the cause".
Fixed (for the record, I believe it should be caps)--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Musically, the song features twin guitar solos after the lyrical part.[22] "Rust in Peace... Polaris", addresses the topic... bad transition, try to give it have more flow.
Addressed. I flipped the order, the Hangar 18 stuff is now behind the RIP... Polaris stuff now.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can we return the The Rolling Stone Album Guide review? Look at page 534–it's half a sentence only ("Rust in Peace upped the ante with "Hangar 18," an impressively expansive conspiracy number, and Countdown to Extinction..."), but FAs cite that book, and along with Encyclopedia of Popular Music, is regarded as notable source for music criticism.--Retrohead (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I removed that because in the ref check thing that Crowz did, it came up as not working. I tried to look it up via google books, but it wouldn't show me the page. That said, I guess just doing it as a book cite without an internet link (since it's out of a book anyway) would work though--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I've filled the citation template properly. Check the preview of the first title here if you need the album recension. The link to page 534 is removed for some reason, but since we are citing a printed source, it is not necessarily required.--Retrohead (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception

[edit]
  • Why are there two different AllMusic reviews? Shouldn't these be together rather than in different paragraphs?
One (cite 14) is a review of the original album. The other (cite 35, I think) is a review of the rereleased album, which bears significant differences to the original (bonus tracks, remixed, and a few small parts replaced or rerecorded)--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, I put them back to back, while differentiating between them--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both Kim Cooper and Tom Nordlie say the album is "mature"--is there someway you can say that it was thought of as "mature" by multiple reviewers without making it a weasel word? Just think the use of "mature" is redundant and could be easily fixed.
I'll just reword the first one.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I feel like such a consistency ought to be noted in the lead. In other words, I feel like people saying the album was mature would greatly describe the critical reception in the articles introduction. And the prose in "Release and reception" could be reworded to::::Spin reviewer Tom Nordlie praised the album, deeming it a "mature, complex, surprisingly consonant and sparely produced album", and concluded that Rust in Peace "never sleeps". Music journalist Kim Cooper noted the album's maturity as well, and went on to say that it "transcended the hard rock genre and raised the bar to a whole new level". Another positive reaction came from Rock Hard, whose writer Holger Stratmann stated that the record was "pure Megadeth", filled with "razor sharp guitars" and "snotty vocals". or something along those lines. CrowzRSA 02:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you find no negative reviews/comments on the album?
I haven't really seen any for this, but I haven't ever specifically sought out negative reviews for anything. I'll take a look. More on this later--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update I don't really seen any criticism within any or the reviews that is worth including here. It is a widely-acclaimed album as well, so the lack of a negative reaction won't exactly be skewing point of view of the article.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy and influence

[edit]
  • "almost permanent" -- reword
Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments

[edit]
  • There seems to be a bit of info missing from the lead. For example, you fail to mention any themes or anything about album name's origin.
Is that particularly relevant to the lead? Personally, I feel that is material for the body of the article--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To an extent, but I think that stating the technical complexity of the album may be a good idea. Also, siting the basics of the lyrical themes (religion, politics and warfare) would help the article to meet WP:LEAD
I'll work in the complexity, lyrics and a BRIEF summary of the artwork--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does the album's artwork relate to "Hangar 18"?
While I believe that it is, I have not seen any sources explicitly saying so, so to include that would be OR--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
After doing some research, I found this by Roadrunner Records.[2]
You know, the ironic thing is that the info about the world leaders was in the article previously, but either Retrohead or myself (probably myself) removed it due to lack of a citation. Bush and Gorbachev (and maybe Major) are obvious, but the other two are a little more obscure. In any case, got some work to do here.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update  Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is there no singles section of the infobox?
Added. Cited from Discogs, though I'm not sure if that's an RS or not. Otherwise, I got no obvious sources for release dates, which is why it was originally omitted.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 02:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, CD Universe is not a reliable source. I believe the same goes for metalassault.com and discogs. I will look at the single section later to see what I can do.
Gonna knock out CD universe and Metalassault. CD universe was added because it was citing a review (I believe Q magazine's review is quoted on there, but like I said, that's gone in a moment. I'll hold off regarding the singles for now then.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done CrowzRSA
  • "British album certifications – Megadeth – Rust in Peace". British Phonographic Industry. Enter Rust in Peace in the field Search. Select Title in the field Search by. Select album in the field By Format. Click Go -- does this comply with WP:MOS?
I'm not certain if it does, but I know that type of citation is used in some other Megadeth GAs, so I didn't see issue with it.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final final comments

[edit]
  • Inconsistency of "AllMusic" and "Allmusic" (I think it's AllMusic now)
I actually noticed an instance of that earlier, (though "corrected" it to a lowercase "m". I'll go through and take care of that--L1A1 FAL (talk) 05:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:DASH, all the reference dashes should be "–" not "-". So for example: "Megadeth - Where to Start with". Kerrang!. Retrieved October 24, 2013. should be "Megadeth – Where to Start with". Kerrang!. Retrieved October 24, 2013.. HOWEVER, things like australian-charts.com and ISBN 1-135-87921-4 should remain how they are. Does that make sense? I know it's a stupid requirement but someone brought it up in a FAC a while back.
The (policy about the) dash thing confuses me and seems trivial, but I understand why you're bringing it up. It's a mistake I frequently make. I'll take a look through and see what I can do--L1A1 FAL (talk) 05:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update I think I have the Mdash thing fixed. One question though, last sentence, second paragraph in "background and Production" section ("...focused on Guns N' Roses' Use Your Illusion I and II which were also being recorded at Rumbo and stated..."), should ehose be M or N dashes? I assumed M dashes--L1A1 FAL (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator questions

[edit]

In the criteria check below, you indicate concerns with the sources. Could you expand on that? Thanks--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I actually just need to check each of the sources and make sure it accurately verifies the information. Shouldn't take too long.
Ah, my mistake, I thought you were indicating that there was a problem with one or more sources already.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 02:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria check

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass:

Very close to passing! Okay, I'm passing it now. Excellent job on the article and thank you for being so quick to respond to comments. The only suggestions I have for the article if you were wanting to go onto a FA quality article are:

  • Add Alternative text for images, add a music sample, add a "Release history" section, work on the lead a bit more as to sum up the entire article, and possibly expand the "Composition" section. I do suggest a thorough copyedit as well, even though it reads quite well. So its not far off from featured-quality IMO. Again, excellent job man, good to see another metal article get attention. CrowzRSA 18:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing then I'll pass it!!!!!!

[edit]
  • The "Accolades" section—to an extent—appears to be in random order. I see it goes from Canada to the US to the UK. 3 things:
    • 1.)This is inconsistent with the "Certifications" order, which goes Canada, UK, US ←(correct pattern)
    • 2.)With that in mind, it should be "Region" not "County," correct?
    • 3.)There ought to be a sub-pattern. In other words, I understand the main pattern goes by Region, but within the Region pattern it seems there is a random listing order. It would be logical to order it by year (preferable) or even alphabetically by publication. If you do choose to order it by year (again, preferable), then the year ought to be the first column.
How does it look now?--L1A1 FAL (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After these issues are resolved, consider it a good article. CrowzRSA 06:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA congrats

[edit]

Good work, all. Binksternet (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rust in Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Rust in Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World Leaders Labeling

[edit]

This question may seem really picky, but why did the author choose to identify the world leaders on the cover artwork from right to left? The more common method is left to right. While this method works here, as a semi-professional Tech Writer I'm just curious when I see something like this. Any information or background is appreciated, thanks. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – listed them left to right. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado of Souls

[edit]

It seems that many fans regard Marty Friedman's solo on "Tornado" as one of the best, if not *the* best metal solo of all times, and also one of the hardest to play. Don't know if this is worth mentioning in the article. I find information like this interesting. Would need some sources to back it up of course. Here's where I came across it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4WD015wDCM --BjKa (talk) 08:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Major?

[edit]

I could accept the drawing on the cover looking nothing like him, but there's a logic problem with the information given in the citation. The relevant Q&A from Megadeth's official site says it's Major because he was Prime Minister of the UK at the time... except he wasn't. Rust in Peace was released in September 1990 while Margaret Thatcher was still PM. Granted her position was looking unstable, but she wasn't challenged and replaced until November of that year, two months after the album's release. And Major wasn't even confirmed to be a contender until after the first ballot, so there was no reason in September to assume he'd become PM any time soon. Now the Q&A is from almost 17 years after the fact (going by the 09.02.07 timestamp), so whoever was writing the answer perhaps just misremembered or was given faulty information? Are there any quotes from closer to the time about the artwork? I could accept that after the big two, Bush and Gorachev, the other three were just generic men-in-suits, but if they're supposed to be real people, then I have no idea who the guy on the left is meant to be. It looks like Doctor Smith from Lost in Space to me. :D Analog Kid (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm still not entirely convinced by that source. And indeed chronologically it makes little sense that it would be Major. Surely Ed Repka himself would know? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings,
I remember this from the time the album came out, Margaret Thatcher was on her way out, and there were strong rumors that Michael Heseltine was poised to step in as PM. The artist therefore added Heseltine to this artwork, but the gamble did not work out since John Major turned out to be the next PM. I have edited the article but came here because there was a "dubious" flag and wanted to clarify this further. EternityofNight (talk) 01:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a source which quotes the artist, Ed Repka? Without one, all of that is original research. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted back to "an unidentified British representative" as there is no source to say who the British politician is supposed to be - and it looks nothing like Major, Heseltine, or indeed any other high-ranking british politician of the time. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is definitely Michael Heseltine, and looks exactly like him. EternityofNight (talk) 00:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Me arse it does. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks as much like Prince Phillip circa 1990 as it does Heseltine. Rebounds12 (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: Unmerge Tornado of Souls

[edit]

Why was “Tornado of Souls” ever merged? It has one of the most famous solos in all of Metal history. Also, the song’s meaning has been misinterpreted as Dave wanting to murder is his girlfriend, when it’s actually about how Dave was feeling after the end of a toxic relationship. This song should have its own article. KevinML (talk) 02:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]