Jump to content

Multiplicative partition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m put ö in Erdos
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: bibcode, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by LeapTorchGear | Category:Integer sequences | #UCB_Category 203/220
 
(70 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[number theory]], a '''multiplicative partition''' or '''unordered factorization''' of an integer <math>n</math> is a way of writing <math>n</math> as a product of integers greater than 1, treating two products as equivalent if they differ only in the ordering of the factors. The number <math>n</math> is itself considered one of these products. Multiplicative partitions closely parallel the study of '''multipartite partitions''',{{r|a}} which are additive [[Partition (number theory)|partitions]] of finite sequences of positive integers, with the addition made [[pointwise]]. Although the study of multiplicative partitions has been ongoing since at least 1923, the name "multiplicative partition" appears to have been introduced by {{harvtxt|Hughes|Shallit|1983}}.{{r|hs}} The Latin name "factorisatio numerorum" had been used previously. [[MathWorld]] uses the term '''unordered factorization'''.
'''Multiplicative partition''' ([[Number theory]])


==Examples==
In [[number theory]], a '''multiplicative partition''' of an integer '''n''' that is greater than 1 is a way of writing n as a product of integers greater than 1. The number n is itself considered one of these products.
*The number 20 has four multiplicative partitions: 2&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;2&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;5, 2&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;10, 4&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;5, and 20.
*3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;3, 3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;9, 3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;27, 9&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;9, and 81 are the five multiplicative partitions of 81 = 3<sup>4</sup>. Because it is the fourth power of a [[prime number|prime]], 81 has the same number (five) of multiplicative partitions as 4 does of [[partition (number theory)|additive partitions]].
*The number 30 has five multiplicative partitions: 2&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;5 = 2&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;15 = 6&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;5 = 3&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;10 = 30.
*In general, the number of multiplicative partitions of a [[Square-free integer|squarefree]] number with <math>i</math> prime factors is the <math>i</math>th [[Bell number]], <math>B_i</math>.


==Application==
===Examples===
{{harvtxt|Hughes|Shallit|1983}} describe an application of multiplicative partitions in classifying integers with a given number of divisors. For example, the integers with exactly 12 divisors take the forms <math>p^{11}</math>, <math>p\cdot q^5</math>, <math>p^2\cdot q^3</math>, and <math>p\cdot q\cdot r^2</math>, where <math>p</math>, <math>q</math>, and <math>r</math> are distinct [[prime number]]s; these forms correspond to the multiplicative partitions <math>12</math>, <math>2\cdot 6</math>, <math>3\cdot 4</math>, and <math>2\cdot 2\cdot 3</math> respectively. More generally, for each multiplicative partition
*2*2*5, 2*10, 4*5, and 20 are the four multiplicative partitions of 20.
<math display=block>k = \prod t_i</math>
*3*3*3*3, 3*3*9, 3*27, 9*9, and 81 are the five multiplicative permutations of 81 = 3^4. Because 81 is the fourth power of a [[prime]], 81 has the same number (five) of multiplicative partitions as the number four has of (additive) [[partition (number theory)|partitions]].
of the integer <math>k</math>, there corresponds a class of integers having exactly <math>k</math> divisors, of the form
*30 = 2*3*5 = 2*15 = 6*5 = 3*10 = 30 has five multiplicative partitions.
:<math>\prod p_i^{t_i-1},</math>
where each <math>p_i</math> is a distinct prime. This correspondence follows from the [[Multiplicative function|multiplicative]] property of the [[divisor function]].{{r|hs}}


==Bounds on the number of partitions==
===see also===
{{harvtxt|Oppenheim|1926}} credits {{harvtxt|MacMahon|1923}} with the problem of counting the number of multiplicative partitions of <math>n</math>;{{r|o|m}} this problem has since been studied by others under the Latin name of ''factorisatio numerorum''. If the number of multiplicative partitions of <math>n</math> is <math>a_n</math>, McMahon and Oppenheim observed that its [[Dirichlet series]] generating function <math>f(s)</math> has the product representation{{r|o|m}}
[[partition (number theory)]]
<math display=block>f(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_n}{n^s}=\prod_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{1-k^{-s}}.</math>


The sequence of numbers <math>a_n</math> begins
[[divisor]]


{{bi|left=1.6| 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 2, 5, 1, 4, 1, 4, 2, 2, 1, 7, 2, 2, 3, 4, 1, 5, 1, 7, 2, 2, 2, 9, 1, 2, 2, ... {{OEIS|id=A001055}}.}}
===References===

*[[John F. Hughes]], [[Jeffrey Shallit|J. O. Shallit]] On the Number or Multiplicative Partitions. [[The American Mathematical Monthly]], August-September 1983.
Oppenheim also claimed an upper bound on <math>a_n</math>, of the form{{r|o}}
*[[E. R. Canfield]], [[Paul Erdös]], [[Carl Pomerance]]. On a problem of Oppenheim concerning "factorisatio numerorum". [[Journal of Number Theory]] 17 (1983), no. 1. 1--28.
<math display=block>a_n\le n\left(\exp\frac{\log n\log\log\log n}{\log\log n}\right)^{-2+o(1)},</math>
but as {{harvtxt|Canfield|Erdős|Pomerance|1983}} showed, this bound is erroneous and the true bound is{{r|cep}}
<math display=block>a_n\le n\left(\exp\frac{\log n\log\log\log n}{\log\log n}\right)^{-1+o(1)}.</math>

Both of these bounds are not far from linear in <math>n</math>: they are of the form <math>n^{1-o(1)}</math>.
However, the typical value of <math>a_n</math> is much smaller: the average value of <math>a_n</math>, averaged over an interval <math>x\le n\le x+N</math>, is
<math display=block>\bar a = \exp\left(\frac{4\sqrt{\log N}}{\sqrt{2e}\log\log N}\bigl(1+o(1)\bigr)\right),</math>
a bound that is of the form <math>n^{o(1)}</math>.{{r|lms}}

==Additional results==
{{harvtxt|Canfield|Erdős|Pomerance|1983}} observe, and {{harvtxt|Luca|Mukhopadhyay|Srinivas|2010}} prove, that most numbers cannot arise as the number <math>a_n</math> of multiplicative partitions of some <math>n</math>: the number of values less than <math>N</math> which arise in this way is <math>N^{O(\log\log\log N/\log\log N)}</math>.{{r|cep|lms}} Additionally, Luca et al. show that most values of <math>n</math> are not multiples of <math>a_n</math>: the number of values <math>n\le N</math> such that <math>a_n</math> divides <math>n</math> is <math>O(N/\log^{1+o(1)} N)</math>.{{r|lms}}

==See also==

*[[Partition (number theory)]]
*[[Divisor]]

==References==
{{reflist|refs=

<ref name=a>{{citation|first=G.|last=Andrews|authorlink=George E. Andrews|title=The Theory of Partitions|year=1976|publisher=Addison-Wesley}}, chapter 12</ref>

<ref name=cep>{{citation|doi=10.1016/0022-314X(83)90002-1|first1=E. R.|last1=Canfield|first2=Paul|last2=Erdős|authorlink2=Paul Erdős|first3=Carl|last3=Pomerance|authorlink3=Carl Pomerance|title=On a problem of Oppenheim concerning 'factorisatio numerorum'|journal=[[Journal of Number Theory]]|volume=17|year=1983|issue=1|pages=1–28|doi-access=free}}</ref>

<ref name=hs>{{citation|first1=John F.|last1=Hughes|first2=Jeffrey|last2=Shallit|authorlink2=Jeffrey Shallit|title=On the number of multiplicative partitions|journal=[[American Mathematical Monthly]]|year=1983|volume=90|issue=7|pages=468–471|doi=10.2307/2975729|jstor=2975729}}</ref>

<ref name=lms>{{citation
| last1 = Luca | first1 = Florian
| last2 = Mukhopadhyay | first2 = Anirban
| last3 = Srinivas | first3 = Kotyada
| doi = 10.4064/aa142-1-3
| issue = 1
| journal = [[Acta Arithmetica]]
| mr = 2601047
| pages = 41–50
| title = Some results on Oppenheim's 'factorisatio numerorum' function
| volume = 142
| year = 2010| doi-access = free
| bibcode = 2010AcAri.142...41L
}}</ref>

<ref name=m>{{citation|doi=10.1112/plms/s2-22.1.404|first=P. A.|last=MacMahon|authorlink=Percy Alexander MacMahon|title=Dirichlet series and the theory of partitions|journal=[[London Mathematical Society#Publications|Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society]]|volume=22|year=1923|pages=404–411}}</ref>

<ref name=o>{{citation|doi=10.1112/jlms/s1-1.4.205|first=A.|last=Oppenheim|title=On an arithmetic function|journal=[[Journal of the London Mathematical Society]]|volume=1|issue=4|pages=205–211|year=1926}}</ref>

}}

==Further reading==
*{{citation |first1=A. |last1=Knopfmacher |first2=M. E. |last2=Mays |year=2005 |title=A survey of factorization counting functions |journal=International Journal of Number Theory |volume=1 |issue=4 |doi=10.1142/S1793042105000315 |pages=563–581 |url=http://math.wvu.edu/~mays/Papers/apf7.pdf}}

==External links==
*{{MathWorld|title=Unordered Factorization|urlname=UnorderedFactorization|mode=cs2}}

[[Category:Number theory]]
[[Category:Integer sequences]]

Latest revision as of 15:17, 3 March 2024

In number theory, a multiplicative partition or unordered factorization of an integer is a way of writing as a product of integers greater than 1, treating two products as equivalent if they differ only in the ordering of the factors. The number is itself considered one of these products. Multiplicative partitions closely parallel the study of multipartite partitions,[1] which are additive partitions of finite sequences of positive integers, with the addition made pointwise. Although the study of multiplicative partitions has been ongoing since at least 1923, the name "multiplicative partition" appears to have been introduced by Hughes & Shallit (1983).[2] The Latin name "factorisatio numerorum" had been used previously. MathWorld uses the term unordered factorization.

Examples

[edit]
  • The number 20 has four multiplicative partitions: 2 × 2 × 5, 2 × 10, 4 × 5, and 20.
  • 3 × 3 × 3 × 3, 3 × 3 × 9, 3 × 27, 9 × 9, and 81 are the five multiplicative partitions of 81 = 34. Because it is the fourth power of a prime, 81 has the same number (five) of multiplicative partitions as 4 does of additive partitions.
  • The number 30 has five multiplicative partitions: 2 × 3 × 5 = 2 × 15 = 6 × 5 = 3 × 10 = 30.
  • In general, the number of multiplicative partitions of a squarefree number with prime factors is the th Bell number, .

Application

[edit]

Hughes & Shallit (1983) describe an application of multiplicative partitions in classifying integers with a given number of divisors. For example, the integers with exactly 12 divisors take the forms , , , and , where , , and are distinct prime numbers; these forms correspond to the multiplicative partitions , , , and respectively. More generally, for each multiplicative partition of the integer , there corresponds a class of integers having exactly divisors, of the form

where each is a distinct prime. This correspondence follows from the multiplicative property of the divisor function.[2]

Bounds on the number of partitions

[edit]

Oppenheim (1926) credits MacMahon (1923) with the problem of counting the number of multiplicative partitions of ;[3][4] this problem has since been studied by others under the Latin name of factorisatio numerorum. If the number of multiplicative partitions of is , McMahon and Oppenheim observed that its Dirichlet series generating function has the product representation[3][4]

The sequence of numbers begins

1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 2, 5, 1, 4, 1, 4, 2, 2, 1, 7, 2, 2, 3, 4, 1, 5, 1, 7, 2, 2, 2, 9, 1, 2, 2, ... (sequence A001055 in the OEIS).

Oppenheim also claimed an upper bound on , of the form[3] but as Canfield, Erdős & Pomerance (1983) showed, this bound is erroneous and the true bound is[5]

Both of these bounds are not far from linear in : they are of the form . However, the typical value of is much smaller: the average value of , averaged over an interval , is a bound that is of the form .[6]

Additional results

[edit]

Canfield, Erdős & Pomerance (1983) observe, and Luca, Mukhopadhyay & Srinivas (2010) prove, that most numbers cannot arise as the number of multiplicative partitions of some : the number of values less than which arise in this way is .[5][6] Additionally, Luca et al. show that most values of are not multiples of : the number of values such that divides is .[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Andrews, G. (1976), The Theory of Partitions, Addison-Wesley, chapter 12
  2. ^ a b Hughes, John F.; Shallit, Jeffrey (1983), "On the number of multiplicative partitions", American Mathematical Monthly, 90 (7): 468–471, doi:10.2307/2975729, JSTOR 2975729
  3. ^ a b c Oppenheim, A. (1926), "On an arithmetic function", Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1 (4): 205–211, doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-1.4.205
  4. ^ a b MacMahon, P. A. (1923), "Dirichlet series and the theory of partitions", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 22: 404–411, doi:10.1112/plms/s2-22.1.404
  5. ^ a b Canfield, E. R.; Erdős, Paul; Pomerance, Carl (1983), "On a problem of Oppenheim concerning 'factorisatio numerorum'", Journal of Number Theory, 17 (1): 1–28, doi:10.1016/0022-314X(83)90002-1
  6. ^ a b c Luca, Florian; Mukhopadhyay, Anirban; Srinivas, Kotyada (2010), "Some results on Oppenheim's 'factorisatio numerorum' function", Acta Arithmetica, 142 (1): 41–50, Bibcode:2010AcAri.142...41L, doi:10.4064/aa142-1-3, MR 2601047

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]