Jump to content

Talk:Effective atomic number (compounds and mixtures): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Forbes72 moved page Talk:Effective atomic number to Talk:Effective atomic number (compounds and mixtures): focus article on single topic (need to set up disambig page)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{physics|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=mid}}

}}
== 2.94? ==
== 2.94? ==


This article makes it seem like 2.94 is ''the'' number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/132.190.12.40|132.190.12.40]] ([[User talk:132.190.12.40|talk]]) 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This article makes it seem like 2.94 is ''the'' number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/132.190.12.40|132.190.12.40]] ([[User talk:132.190.12.40|talk]]) 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Why does water not have an atomic number ==

Why [[Special:Contributions/45.215.254.212|45.215.254.212]] ([[User talk:45.215.254.212|talk]]) 20:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:06, 3 March 2024

2.94?

[edit]

This article makes it seem like 2.94 is the number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.190.12.40 (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why does water not have an atomic number

[edit]

Why 45.215.254.212 (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]