Talk:Effective atomic number (compounds and mixtures): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→2.94?: new section |
→Why does water not have an atomic number: new section |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== 2.94? == |
== 2.94? == |
||
This article makes it seem like 2.94 is ''the'' number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? |
This article makes it seem like 2.94 is ''the'' number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/132.190.12.40|132.190.12.40]] ([[User talk:132.190.12.40|talk]]) 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Why does water not have an atomic number == |
|||
Why [[Special:Contributions/45.215.254.212|45.215.254.212]] ([[User talk:45.215.254.212|talk]]) 20:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 3 March 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
2.94?
[edit]This article makes it seem like 2.94 is the number to use. In actuality, it depends on the type of interactions and thus on the x-ray spectrum. So at the least, I think the article needs to mention what energy range that value of 2.94 is appropriate for. I would edit it in myself, but I don't actually know what the corresponding spectrum is (hence why I surfed to this page). Anyone know what kind of spectra that value is actually appropriate for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.190.12.40 (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)