Prewellordering: Difference between revisions
m →References: {{refbegin}} |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|Set theory concept}} |
||
⚫ | |||
In [[set theory]], a '''prewellordering''' on a [[ |
In [[set theory]], a '''prewellordering''' on a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] <math>X</math> is a [[preorder]] <math>\leq</math> on <math>X</math> (a [[Transitive relation|transitive]] and [[Reflexive relation|reflexive]] relation on <math>X</math>) that is [[Strongly connected relation|strongly connected]] (meaning that any two points are comparable) and [[Well-founded relation|well-founded]] in the sense that the induced relation <math>x < y</math> defined by <math>x \leq y \text{ and } y \nleq x</math> is a [[well-founded relation]]. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Prewellordering on a set== |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
A '''prewellordering''' on a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] <math>X</math> is a [[homogeneous binary relation]] <math>\,\leq\,</math> on <math>X</math> that satisfies the following conditions:{{sfn|Moschovakis|2006|p=106}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
<ol> |
|||
⚫ | If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is a [[pointclass]] of subsets of some collection <math>\mathcal{F}</math> of [[Polish space]]s, <math>\mathcal{F}</math> closed under [[Cartesian product]], and if <math>\leq</math> is a prewellordering of some subset <math>P</math> of some element <math>X</math> of <math>\mathcal{F}</math> |
||
<li>[[Reflexive relation|Reflexivity]]: <math>x \leq x</math> for all <math>x \in X.</math> </li> |
|||
⚫ | |||
<li>[[Transitive relation|Transitivity]]: if <math>x < y</math> and <math>y < z</math> then <math>x < z</math> for all <math>x, y, z \in X.</math></li> |
|||
⚫ | |||
<li>[[Strongly connected relation|Total/Strongly connected]]: <math>x \leq y</math> or <math>y \leq x</math> for all <math>x, y \in X.</math></li> |
|||
<li>for every non-empty subset <math>S \subseteq X,</math> there exists some <math>m \in S</math> such that <math>m \leq s</math> for all <math>s \in S.</math> |
|||
* This condition is equivalent to the induced strict preorder <math>x < y</math> defined by <math>x \leq y</math> and <math>y \nleq x</math> being a [[well-founded relation]].</li> |
|||
</ol> |
|||
A [[homogeneous binary relation]] <math>\,\leq\,</math> on <math>X</math> is a prewellordering if and only if there exists a [[surjection]] <math>\pi : X \to Y</math> into a [[well-ordered set]] <math>(Y, \lesssim)</math> such that for all <math>x, y \in X,</math> <math display=inline>x \leq y</math> if and only if <math>\pi(x) \lesssim \pi(y).</math>{{sfn|Moschovakis|2006|p=106}} |
|||
===Examples=== |
|||
[[Image:Prewellordering example x div 4 leq y div 5.gif|thumb|right|[[Hasse diagram]] of the prewellordering <math>\lfloor x/4\rfloor \leq \lfloor y/5\rfloor</math> on the non-negative integers, shown up to 29. Cycles are indicated in red and <math>\lfloor \cdot\rfloor</math> denotes the [[floor function]].]] |
|||
[[Image:Prewellordering example svg.svg|thumb|right|[[Hasse diagram]] of the prewellordering <math>\lfloor x/4\rfloor \leq \lfloor y/4\rfloor</math> on the non-negative integers, shown up to 18. The associated equivalence relation is <math>\lfloor x/4\rfloor = \lfloor y/4\rfloor;</math> it identifies the numbers in each light red square.]] |
|||
Given a set <math>A,</math> the binary relation on the set <math>X := \operatorname{Finite}(A)</math> of all finite subsets of <math>A</math> defined by <math>S \leq T</math> if and only if <math>|S| \leq |T|</math> (where <math>|\cdot|</math> denotes the set's [[cardinality]]) is a prewellordering.{{sfn|Moschovakis|2006|p=106}} |
|||
===Properties=== |
|||
If <math>\leq</math> is a prewellordering on <math>X,</math> then the relation <math>\sim</math> defined by |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is a [[pointclass]] of subsets of some collection <math>\mathcal{F}</math> of [[Polish space]]s, <math>\mathcal{F}</math> closed under [[Cartesian product]], and if <math>\leq</math> is a prewellordering of some subset <math>P</math> of some element <math>X</math> of <math>\mathcal{F},</math> then <math>\leq</math> is said to be a <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math>-'''prewellordering''' of <math>P</math> if the relations <math><^*</math> and <math>\leq^*</math> are elements of <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma},</math> where for <math>x, y \in X,</math> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
<math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is said to have the '''prewellordering property''' if every set in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> admits a <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math>-prewellordering. |
<math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is said to have the '''prewellordering property''' if every set in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> admits a <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math>-prewellordering. |
||
Line 18: | Line 44: | ||
===Examples=== |
===Examples=== |
||
<math>\boldsymbol{\Pi}^1_1</math> and <math>\boldsymbol{\Sigma}^1_2</math> both have the prewellordering property; this is provable in [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory|ZFC]] alone. Assuming sufficient [[large cardinal]]s, for every <math>n\in\omega</math> |
<math>\boldsymbol{\Pi}^1_1</math> and <math>\boldsymbol{\Sigma}^1_2</math> both have the prewellordering property; this is provable in [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory|ZFC]] alone. Assuming sufficient [[large cardinal]]s, for every <math>n \in \omega,</math> <math>\boldsymbol{\Pi}^1_{2n+1}</math> and <math>\boldsymbol{\Sigma}^1_{2n+2}</math> |
||
have the prewellordering property. |
have the prewellordering property. |
||
===Consequences=== |
===Consequences=== |
||
====Reduction==== |
====Reduction==== |
||
If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is an [[adequate pointclass]] with the prewellordering property, then it also has the '''reduction property''': For any space <math>X\in\mathcal{F}</math> and any sets <math>A,B\subseteq X</math> |
If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is an [[adequate pointclass]] with the prewellordering property, then it also has the '''reduction property''': For any space <math>X \in \mathcal{F}</math> and any sets <math>A, B \subseteq X,</math> <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> both in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma},</math> the union <math>A \cup B</math> may be partitioned into sets <math>A^*, B^*,</math> both in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma},</math> such that <math>A^* \subseteq A</math> and <math>B^* \subseteq B.</math> |
||
====Separation==== |
====Separation==== |
||
If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is an [[adequate pointclass]] whose [[dual pointclass]] has the prewellordering property, then <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> has the '''separation property''': For any space <math>X\in\mathcal{F}</math> and any sets <math>A,B\subseteq X</math>, <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> ''disjoint'' sets both in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math>, there is a set <math>C\subseteq X</math> such that both <math>C</math> and its [[Complement (set theory)|complement]] <math>X\setminus C</math> are in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math>, with <math>A\subseteq C</math> and <math>B\cap C=\emptyset</math>. |
|||
If <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> is an [[adequate pointclass]] whose [[dual pointclass]] has the prewellordering property, then <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma}</math> has the '''separation property''': For any space <math>X \in \mathcal{F}</math> and any sets <math>A, B \subseteq X,</math> <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> ''disjoint'' sets both in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma},</math> there is a set <math>C \subseteq X</math> such that both <math>C</math> and its [[Complement (set theory)|complement]] <math>X \setminus C</math> are in <math>\boldsymbol{\Gamma},</math> with <math>A \subseteq C</math> and <math>B \cap C = \varnothing.</math> |
|||
For example, <math>\boldsymbol{\Pi}^1_1</math> has the prewellordering property, so <math>\boldsymbol{\Sigma}^1_1</math> has the separation property. This means that if <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are disjoint [[analytic set|analytic]] subsets of some Polish space <math>X,</math> then there is a [[Borel set|Borel]] subset <math>C</math> of <math>X</math> such that <math>C</math> includes <math>A</math> and is disjoint from <math>B.</math> |
|||
== See also == |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== |
==See also== |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==References== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
⚫ | * {{cite book|author=Moschovakis, Yiannis N.|authorlink=Yiannis N. Moschovakis|title=Descriptive Set Theory|publisher=North Holland|publication-place=Amsterdam|year=1980|isbn=978-0-08-096319-8|oclc=499778252|url=https://archive.org/details/descriptivesetth0000mosc|url-access=registration}} <!--{{sfn|Moschovakis|1980|p=}}--> |
||
* {{cite book|last=Moschovakis|first=Yiannis N.|author-link=Yiannis N. Moschovakis|title=Notes on set theory|publisher=Springer|publication-place=New York|year=2006|isbn=978-0-387-31609-3|oclc=209913560}} <!--{{sfn|Moschovakis|2006|p=}}--> |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
{{Order theory}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Descriptive set theory]] |
[[Category:Descriptive set theory]] |
||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Order theory]] |
[[Category:Order theory]] |
||
⚫ |
Latest revision as of 06:49, 4 March 2024
Transitive binary relations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
indicates that the column's property is always true for the row's term (at the very left), while ✗ indicates that the property is not guaranteed in general (it might, or might not, hold). For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by in the "Symmetric" column and ✗ in the "Antisymmetric" column, respectively. All definitions tacitly require the homogeneous relation be transitive: for all if and then |
In set theory, a prewellordering on a set is a preorder on (a transitive and reflexive relation on ) that is strongly connected (meaning that any two points are comparable) and well-founded in the sense that the induced relation defined by is a well-founded relation.
Prewellordering on a set
[edit]A prewellordering on a set is a homogeneous binary relation on that satisfies the following conditions:[1]
- Reflexivity: for all
- Transitivity: if and then for all
- Total/Strongly connected: or for all
- for every non-empty subset there exists some such that for all
- This condition is equivalent to the induced strict preorder defined by and being a well-founded relation.
A homogeneous binary relation on is a prewellordering if and only if there exists a surjection into a well-ordered set such that for all if and only if [1]
Examples
[edit]Given a set the binary relation on the set of all finite subsets of defined by if and only if (where denotes the set's cardinality) is a prewellordering.[1]
Properties
[edit]If is a prewellordering on then the relation defined by is an equivalence relation on and induces a wellordering on the quotient The order-type of this induced wellordering is an ordinal, referred to as the length of the prewellordering.
A norm on a set is a map from into the ordinals. Every norm induces a prewellordering; if is a norm, the associated prewellordering is given by Conversely, every prewellordering is induced by a unique regular norm (a norm is regular if, for any and any there is such that ).
Prewellordering property
[edit]If is a pointclass of subsets of some collection of Polish spaces, closed under Cartesian product, and if is a prewellordering of some subset of some element of then is said to be a -prewellordering of if the relations and are elements of where for
is said to have the prewellordering property if every set in admits a -prewellordering.
The prewellordering property is related to the stronger scale property; in practice, many pointclasses having the prewellordering property also have the scale property, which allows drawing stronger conclusions.
Examples
[edit]and both have the prewellordering property; this is provable in ZFC alone. Assuming sufficient large cardinals, for every and have the prewellordering property.
Consequences
[edit]Reduction
[edit]If is an adequate pointclass with the prewellordering property, then it also has the reduction property: For any space and any sets and both in the union may be partitioned into sets both in such that and
Separation
[edit]If is an adequate pointclass whose dual pointclass has the prewellordering property, then has the separation property: For any space and any sets and disjoint sets both in there is a set such that both and its complement are in with and
For example, has the prewellordering property, so has the separation property. This means that if and are disjoint analytic subsets of some Polish space then there is a Borel subset of such that includes and is disjoint from
See also
[edit]- Descriptive set theory – Subfield of mathematical logic
- Graded poset – partially ordered set equipped with a rank function – a graded poset is analogous to a prewellordering with a norm, replacing a map to the ordinals with a map to the natural numbers
- Scale property – kind of object in descriptive set theory
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Moschovakis 2006, p. 106.
- Moschovakis, Yiannis N. (1980). Descriptive Set Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland. ISBN 978-0-08-096319-8. OCLC 499778252.
- Moschovakis, Yiannis N. (2006). Notes on set theory. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-31609-3. OCLC 209913560.