Talk:Mary Ann Glendon: Difference between revisions
Aboutmovies (talk | contribs) m updated wikiproject WikiProject Biography «C» |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6. Tag: |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Glendon, Mary Ann| |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=}} |
||
⚫ | |||
|living=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=C |
|||
⚫ | |||
|listas=Glendon, Mary Ann |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| blp=yes |
|||
}} |
|||
==Untitled== |
==Untitled== |
||
Line 25: | Line 16: | ||
The fact that the invite was "controversial" is substantiated by a citation to a CBS News article (it boggles my mind that anybody could have actually contested this in good faith, in light of the protests, statements from bishops across the country, and media coverage on all major outlets), and the statement that Obama has "strong pro-choice policies" is supported by a citation to Obama's own web site, which touts his "strong pro-choice record." Consequently, I've reverted the summary deletion of this properly sourced material by [[User:TheCondor24]].-[[User:PassionoftheDamon|PassionoftheDamon]] ([[User talk:PassionoftheDamon|talk]]) 23:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
The fact that the invite was "controversial" is substantiated by a citation to a CBS News article (it boggles my mind that anybody could have actually contested this in good faith, in light of the protests, statements from bishops across the country, and media coverage on all major outlets), and the statement that Obama has "strong pro-choice policies" is supported by a citation to Obama's own web site, which touts his "strong pro-choice record." Consequently, I've reverted the summary deletion of this properly sourced material by [[User:TheCondor24]].-[[User:PassionoftheDamon|PassionoftheDamon]] ([[User talk:PassionoftheDamon|talk]]) 23:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Canon 915 == |
|||
In the "Personal Life" section, I've added language (with supporting references) that divorce and remarriage is a sin under Catholic doctrine. This seems highly pertinent to me because much of Glendon's [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] stems from her staunch devotion to Catholic principles. If consensus is to the contrary, please feel free to revert it. --[[User:Shad0|Shadow]] ([[User talk:Shad0|talk]]) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't think that's relevant. The first marriage was civil. She married her second husband [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-09-07-mn-43241-story.html in a Catholic church]. Presumably if the Catholic Church was OK with marrying them there's no need to speculate here on whether or not it's sinful. [[User:Flyte35|Flyte35]] ([[User talk:Flyte35|talk]]) 01:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Neutrality on lede == |
|||
There has been IP reversion of the introduction, removing the verbiage that the subject is actively working against abortion rights. The IP has stated it is not a right but a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade, affirmed that access to safe and legal abortion is a constitutional right. I will step back, to avoid an edit war but leave this as a placeholder to discuss. [[User:Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) 18:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 5 March 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]She is also a fan of the band Dropkick Murphy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.209.25.116 (talk) 02:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC) apparently the cranks on conservapedia are annoyed at this little tidbit, though it is kinda cute —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122589423KM (talk • contribs) 11:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Laetare Medal
[edit]The fact that the invite was "controversial" is substantiated by a citation to a CBS News article (it boggles my mind that anybody could have actually contested this in good faith, in light of the protests, statements from bishops across the country, and media coverage on all major outlets), and the statement that Obama has "strong pro-choice policies" is supported by a citation to Obama's own web site, which touts his "strong pro-choice record." Consequently, I've reverted the summary deletion of this properly sourced material by User:TheCondor24.-PassionoftheDamon (talk) 23:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Canon 915
[edit]In the "Personal Life" section, I've added language (with supporting references) that divorce and remarriage is a sin under Catholic doctrine. This seems highly pertinent to me because much of Glendon's notability stems from her staunch devotion to Catholic principles. If consensus is to the contrary, please feel free to revert it. --Shadow (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think that's relevant. The first marriage was civil. She married her second husband in a Catholic church. Presumably if the Catholic Church was OK with marrying them there's no need to speculate here on whether or not it's sinful. Flyte35 (talk) 01:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Neutrality on lede
[edit]There has been IP reversion of the introduction, removing the verbiage that the subject is actively working against abortion rights. The IP has stated it is not a right but a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade, affirmed that access to safe and legal abortion is a constitutional right. I will step back, to avoid an edit war but leave this as a placeholder to discuss. Ifnord (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles