Talk:John Barrymore: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: auto. Tag: |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
|currentstatus=FA |
|currentstatus=FA |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|maindate=15 February 2015 |
|maindate=15 February 2015 |
||
|otd1date=2018-05-29|otd1oldid=843462159 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|otd2date=2022-05-29|otd2oldid=1090179347 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|otd3date=2023-05-29|otd3oldid=1157104126 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no |
|||
|class = FA |
|||
|filmbio-work-group=yes |
|||
|filmbio-priority=high |
|||
|listas=Barrymore, John}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 32: | Line 22: | ||
|archive = Talk:John Barrymore/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:John Barrymore/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Barrymore, John|1= |
|||
{{OnThisDay|date1=2018-05-29|oldid1=843462159|date2=2022-05-29|oldid2=1090179347}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{archive box | auto=yes | age=30 | bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Entertainers|class=FA}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Gene Barrymore?== |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=high}} |
|||
Find a Grave claims that Barrymore had an illegitimate son named Gene born in 1915 (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=15537384), and Geni.com even seems to allege that the mother was Evelyn Nesbit http://www.geni.com/people/Geme-Barrymore/6000000006805237135 [[User:AloysiusZimmerfloss|C'est la vie]] ([[User talk:AloysiusZimmerfloss|talk]]) 03:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Talkheader}} |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[John Barrymore]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=804185975 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141230210043/http://www.northjersey.com/news/taking-on-a-new-name-1.968554 to http://www.northjersey.com/news/taking-on-a-new-name-1.968554 |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Infobox == |
|||
Since when adding a few names to the infobox is "forcing personal preference"? The fact is that as a major contributor of this article, [[User:SchroCat|you]] are probably the one who prefers to keep the infobox in its current format, based on your preferences. I respect your opinion, but may I ask why you insist on removing those names? <span style="font:'Pristina'">[[user:Keivan.f|<span style="color: #1E7HDC">Keivan.f</span>]]</span><span style="font:'Pristina'"><sup>[[user_talk:Keivan.f|<span style="color: purple">Talk</span>]]</sup></span> 19:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*Its your personal preference as this IB has been without the names since 2016 (to the best of my recollection). When you were reverted you should have come here, rather than try and force the issue by re-reverting. We do not need to add lists of names to the box. We have a link to the whole family, so there's is no benefit in adding swathes of other names to duplicate: less is more is a good rule of thumb when it comes to IBs. – [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 19:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::You are the one who started reverting, and the fact that the infobox has been without the names since 2016 doesn't make it forbidden for everyone else to edit it. As I had realized earlier there's no point in this discussion because both of us have opposing views. Probably I should open an RfC and ask what the other users think. <span style="font:'Pristina'">[[user:Keivan.f|<span style="color: #1E7HDC">Keivan.f</span>]]</span><span style="font:'Pristina'"><sup>[[user_talk:Keivan.f|<span style="color: purple">Talk</span>]]</sup></span> 19:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yes, I reverted first: it's what BRD suggests should happen. What it suggests next is for discussion, not for you to enter into edit warring. If you wish to waste people's time with an RfC, that is entirely up to you. As to your rationale of "{{tq|Only those whom he hadn't met, like his grandparents}}", perhaps you should start by reading the article to understand his relationship with, for example, his grandmother, before try and sum up his life in meaningless factoids. – [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 19:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Of course I have already read the article, otherwise I wouldn't have become interested in editing it. "{{tq|not for you to enter into edit warring}}" I suppose you don't even know what edit war means then. One revert per 24 hours is not considered an edit war. And as you are already aware, I'm able to open an RfC and ask for the opinions of others. Whether it's a waste of time or not, however, cannot be determined by you. <span style="font:'Pristina'">[[user:Keivan.f|<span style="color: #1E7HDC">Keivan.f</span>]]</span><span style="font:'Pristina'"><sup>[[user_talk:Keivan.f|<span style="color: purple">Talk</span>]]</sup></span> 21:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::''You'' breached BRD: that's edit warring. End of story. Despite your claim to the contrary, I do know what I'm talking about. |
|||
:::::If you had bothered reading the article you wouldn't have written "{{tq|Only those whom he hadn't met, like his grandparents}}", as his grandmother was the main female role model in his life – something the article makes clear. – [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 21:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:17, 9 March 2024
John Barrymore is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 15, 2015. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 29, 2018, May 29, 2022, and May 29, 2023. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Barrymore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- FA-Class vital articles in People
- FA-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles
- FA-Class Theatre articles
- High-importance Theatre articles
- WikiProject Theatre articles
- FA-Class Philadelphia articles
- Mid-importance Philadelphia articles
- Automatically assessed Philadelphia articles
- FA-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- FA-Class Los Angeles articles
- Mid-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- FA-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- High-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles