Jump to content

Talk:Columbia-class submarine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,153,822 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Remove 5 deprecated parameters: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5.
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
⚫
{{WPMILHIST|class=start|B1=y|B2=n|B3=n|B4=y|B5=y|US=yes|Maritime=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WPSHIPS|class=start|B1=y|B2=n|B3=n|B4=y|B5=y}}
⚫
{{WikiProject Military history|class=start|B1=y|B2=n|B3=n|B4=y|B5=y|US=yes|Maritime=yes}}

{{WikiProject Ships}}
== October 2012 presentation ==
}}

{{old move|date=13 July 2022|destination=District of Columbia-class submarine|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1098458204#Requested move 13 July 2022}}
There's more details in the Brougham presentation and in an article about it [http://news.usni.org/news-analysis/news/ohio-class-replacement-details here] if someone wants to incorporate it. The SSBN(X) designation seems to being deprecated in preference to the Ohio Replacement Submarine. [[User:FlagSteward|FlagSteward]] ([[User talk:FlagSteward|talk]]) 17:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

== Article Title ==

The page is currently "SSBN-X future follow-on submarine," however the program is now officially titled the "Ohio-class Replacement Program." I believe one of the most up-to-date articles on the subject can be found [http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121221/DEFREG02/312210007/Submarine-Design-Effort-Gets-2B-Boost?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|World%20News|s here]. The article makes this point but the title remains unchanged. Should it not be changed? [[User:Rugads5|Rugz]] ([[User talk:Rugads5|talk]]) 17:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

== Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page ==

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist|request page for whitelisting]].
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|blacklist request page]].
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the [[meta:Talk:Spam Blacklist|request page on meta]].
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

'''Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:'''

*<nowiki>http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/triomphant/</nowiki>
*:''Triggered by <code>\bnaval-technology\.com\b</code> on the local blacklist''

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact [[User:Cyberpower678]] and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 12:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

{{done|Resolved}} This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-5.8ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Online</sub> 22:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

== Miscellaneous Section ==

Does the miscellaneous section really belong in this article? It seems to me to be, at best, tangentally related to the subject.[[User:HubcapD|HubcapD]] ([[User talk:HubcapD|talk]]) 23:46, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Ohio Replacement Submarine]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730874224 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150420224306/http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_14/torpedoes.html to http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_14/torpedoes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

== Potential ship naming ==

The first Ohio replacement sub may be the USS ''Columbia'', which would make this the [https://news.usni.org/2016/07/28/ohio-replacement-sub-class-named-d-c ''Columbia'' class ballistic missile submarine]. The name ''Columbia'' would be in honor of the U.S. District of Columbia. [[User:Shelbystripes|Shelbystripes]] ([[User talk:Shelbystripes|talk]]) 07:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
:To prevent a premature page move, I have redirected the new potential target page and made a couple of pro forma edits so non-administrators will not be able to move the page. Once a consensus exists to move the page, a move can be requested. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 00:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

== Requested move 3 September 2016 ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was: '''Not moved'''. The consensus is to wait a few days. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 18:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
----


[[:Ohio Replacement Submarine]] → {{no redirect|Columbia-class submarine}} – Now that the ship is officially named, it should be moved to the appropriate page. &ndash; <font face="Georgia">'''''[[User:Illegitimate Barrister|Illegitimate Barrister]]'''''</font> ([[User_talk:Illegitimate_Barrister|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Illegitimate Barrister|contribs]]), 04:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
*'''WAIT a few days''' The submarine has not been officially named yet. While the proposed name was sent to Congress at the end of July, statute requires the Secretary wait at least 30 days after the notification of Congress before a vessel can be officially named. I would expect that the vessel will be officially named, probably this week or next week. Until that happens, wait, but as soon as that happens, I will concur with the move proposal. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 19:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
:*It appears that Congress already expects the ship to be named ''Columbia'', and the class to be the ''Columbia'' class. An [https://news.usni.org/2016/08/25/document-report-congress-columbia-class-submarine-program August 18 report from the Congressional Research Service] describes the program as the "Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program" in its title, and also describes it specifically as "the Columbia class program, previously known as the Ohio replacement program (ORP) or SSBN(X) program." The [[Congressional Research Service]] is a non-partisan research team operating under Congress, which prepares reports for Congress at its request. It is generally regarded as an unbiased and reliable source. [[User:Shelbystripes|Shelbystripes]] ([[User talk:Shelbystripes|talk]]) 19:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
::*'''Comment''' I do hold a high respect for the CRS, but I believe their usage of Columbia-class is pragmatic and the right thing to do for the purposes of their report. Congress expects the class to be named Columbia-class because the Secretary of the Navy sent them the necessary notification. HOWEVER. The ship class is not OFFICIALLY the Columbia-class until tthe Secretary of the Navy makes the formal naming announcement, which he has not done yet. Until, it is still the Ohio Replacement Program. While it is tempting to do so, we should not jump the gun. I believe we are looking at mere days until that announcement comes and I believe we should wait for it. So I will stick to my current position of wait, with the caveat that the instant that naming announcement is made, then we can go ahead and move the page. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 20:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
* '''Wait until official announcement''' - as Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball, and per Safiel's comments. - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 20:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== Conventional Trident ==
Does anyone know if there has been any furthering of the [[Trident_(missile)#Conventional_Trident| Conventional Trident]] in general, but more specifically any consequences, permutations, versions, etc. for the Columbia/Ohio Replacement? </br>
[[User:LP-mn|LP-mn]] ([[User talk:LP-mn|talk]]) 06:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

== We can now go ahead with the move to [[Columbia-class submarine]] ==

Well, it was actually more than the "few days" I said in the previous move discussion, but with this reliably sourced announcement https://news.usni.org/2016/12/13/secnav-mabus-to-officially-designate-first-orp-boat-uss-district-of-columbia-ssbn-826 I think we can safely go ahead with the move. Mabus will OFFICIALLY name the new class tomorrow. I will post the necessary tag at the target. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 00:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
*CSD G6 move tag placed at the target and I have updated the article accordingly. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 01:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
*Hull number of the USS Columbia will be SSBN-826. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 01:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

:Done. - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 01:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:24, 11 March 2024

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Columbia-class_submarine&oldid=1213095342"